- Joined
- Aug 31, 2008
- Posts
- 27,450
- Reaction score
- 60,547
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Nuggets
Dafttard what is your evidence to verify your belief the earth is flat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I believe there is a 60% chance the earth is flat compared to a 25-30% chance it is round. I feel I'm being very kind in my percentage towards round,so I'm going with what I believe while keeping an open mind to the other possibilities. In my world this is allowed.You arent making me feel insecure you are trying to. With the techniques ive pointed out.
You keep deflecting my very straightforward points.
The scientific method is what is being taught. You want to teach anti scientific method. The curriculum is already overloaded. How do you intend on doing what you want to do?
Why do you just keep repeating the same meaningless statement without getting any deeper?
How would it be implemented? Why? What is wrong with the scientific method that you think it needs to have anti scientific method taught?
Why did you state that the earth is flat?
Look through the thread.Dafttard what is your evidence to verify your belief the earth is flat?
Look through the thread.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So why did you state that the earth IS flat?I believe there is a 60% chance the earth is flat compared to a 25-30% chance it is round.
That contradicts your statement that the earth IS flat.keeping an open mind to the other possibilities.
The Earth is flat.
The oblate spheroid is due to the scientific method. As is the theory of gravity and all the other theories.The round earth theory has to many holes in it despite the ridiculous amounts of funding received in comparison to other theories. All the theories taught in our education system have to many holes,yet despite this they are taught while other worthwhile theories are ignored.
Now,if you don't like the answer,don't agree with the answer or don't understand the answer,I have still given you an answer. The rest is now for you to deal with.
And I'm 100% sure you're a troll.Calling 60% flat I think is about fair.
And I'm 100% sure you're a troll.
Darthbads has a nice ring to it. Typo?
So you agree it's absolutely crucial that FES receives substantial increases in fundind,to provide the increased evidence you crave.We have many times. All of the 'evidence' that has been provided has been debunked.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you agree it's absolutely crucial that FES receives substantial increases in fundind,to provide the increased evidence you crave.
I don't care for your religious beliefs regarding the religion of science.So why did you state that the earth IS flat?
Thats not anything like saying you think the earth is flat.
More deft deflection. I knew it was a slip up of your deliberate agenda.
That contradicts your statement that the earth IS flat.
You said it.
The oblate spheroid is due to the scientific method. As is the theory of gravity and all the other theories.
What is wrong with the scientific method that you want it removed/replaced/discredited?
Why would you say this? You have no intention of stopping talking about how other theories should be taught in school, and how the scientific method is bad.
So why are you telling me you dont want to answer anymore questions or try to actually explain your point?
Is it because you are simply running an agenda to try and discredit the scientific method, but you have no real reason for it, other than your hidden agenda that you are being paid to push?
Quality post.You might want to re read the title of the thread then perhaps start your own titled Round Earth?And I'm 100% sure you're a troll.
Quality post.You might want to re read the title of the thread then perhaps start your own titled Round Earth?
And that's your opinion.Wow.
No, they shouldn't get any funding whatsoever because it's completely and utterly crap.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have given answers available from the research undertaken by the brilliant scientific minds associated with the FES. Research they have undertaken on an unacceptably low budget that needs to be addressed for the well being of our society.How about you use this thread to provide is the evidence behind why you said the Earth is flat and why you also say that you 60% believe it's flat?
Just give us a list of reasons why and I'm sure we'll happily respond to them. As long as it's evidence pointing towards the shape of the Earth and not deflections away from it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No,60% is correct. I think greater research to find the exact model for the earth being flat though is required and we should see these percentages rise significantly.Are you sure you don't forget to put a decimal point in front of 60%?
And no FES should in no way shape or form receive any funding let alone substantial increases until they come up with some actual relevant evidence that can't be shot down in 30 seconds.
Congratulations on your travels.Ive bought 3 around the world airline tickets in my lifetime so far
Im obviously still alive, so we probably flew over the edge rather than fell off it.( I dont know if that was good luck or good planning?)
Im sure if its deliberate flying near the edge would be concealed either by night or clouds. (dont know if pilots and the airlines are in the scam?)
But do you think I have grounds to sue for false advertising?
Name these brilliant scientific minds.I have given answers available from the research undertaken by the brilliant scientific minds associated with the FES. Research they have undertaken on an unacceptably low budget that needs to be addressed for the well being of our society.
If you are unhappy with the answers given,that is within your rights,as it is for you to believe the earth is a ball.
Sat in a seatCongratulations on your travels.
Did you fly the plane or just sit in a seat?
And that's your opinion.
I've outlined mine including reasons why,these reasons have also taken into account what the current religion of sciences unproven theories might be having on the welfare and psychological state of our future generation, and subsequently society as a whole.
I find it strange you expect better answers regarding FE but don't feel a desire for increases in funding for greater scientific research to be undertaken by the FES.
Ive bought 3 around the world airline tickets in my lifetime so far
Im obviously still alive, so we probably flew over the edge rather than fell off it.( I dont know if that was good luck or good planning?)
Im sure if its deliberate flying near the edge would be concealed either by night or clouds. (dont know if pilots and the airlines are in the scam?)
But do you think I have grounds to sue for false advertising?

