- Joined
- May 25, 2018
- Posts
- 13,730
- Reaction score
- 29,799
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Wouldn't have mattered what we did.In all seriousness, I think we botched this. We made a bunch of points about the extenuating circumstances and the reasonableness of McGovern's actions without actually clearly stating which parts of the grading should be changed.
Essendon's medical report says he was "treated for concussion". And yet, he's since been cleared of concussion. All we had to do was argue that if he's been cleared of concussion, there's no reason to claim that there was anything above low impact to the head. It smacks of sly wording on Essendon's behalf. Maybe get a doctor of our own as a witness to question their assessment.
Think we could have done better.





