Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Mark Neeld Mega-Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr.X
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I could talk about this for ages and did, in fact, when Jim Stynes was alive. Even now, bagging him and his club's obsession with him is 'too soon' for a person like me, who has such negative feelings about him to open.

Advice for Garry Lyon: If you're really not interested in the job, stop saying you are not interested. Stop turning up when the club is in crisis to lend a part-time hand as if you're the messiah. Either step up or shut up.

Advice for Melbourne's recruiters: You're the ones to blame. Resign now.

I could go on and on.
 
and SEN will say the same thing for the next 5 weeks in a desperate attempt to draw listeners...
I think you're right.
 
They aren't anymore relevant that Fitzroy was.

This from a supporter of a club who've actually had a worse record than Fitzroy over the course of the last decade, and have consistently been in massively more debt since the turn of the millennium than Fitzroy ever was, while being propped up by large zero-interest loans by the AFL, as yet not paid back.

He has the memory of a gypsy moth. Or perhaps it's wilful blindness. Whichever it may be, it's accompanied by remarkable arrogance - without any logical basis for said arrogance either. (Weren't Carlton also beaten by the Gold Coast last time out?)

Personally, I think it's a case of rampant Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
 
Yikes. And now they've been thumped for the first time by an expansion team.

You know what the worst bit is? I don't see another win for the year.

The Giants at Skoda? They could roll us there, and on percentage they'll jump us. We'll actually win the spoon.
 
This from a supporter of a club who've actually had a worse record than Fitzroy over the course of the last decade, and have consistently been in massively more debt since the turn of the millennium than Fitzroy ever was, while being propped up by large zero-interest loans by the AFL, as yet not paid back.

He has the memory of a gypsy moth. Or perhaps it's wilful blindness. Whichever it may be, it's accompanied by remarkable arrogance - without any logical basis for said arrogance either. (Weren't Carlton also beaten by the Gold Coast last time out?)

Personally, I think it's a case of rampant Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

This from someone who's club despite being crap still pulled big crowds, still contributed to big rivalries during that time.

Logic says you don't contribute much to the AFL landscape thus you wouldn't be missed much a few years down the track.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

And if this was Carlton that was under threat and in jeopardy of going out, would that be ok too? Don't have to like other clubs, but do have to respect their right to be in the competition.

No I don't.

I don't support the AFL, I support my club only.
 
Neeld will go as soon as the president comes out and states the coaches job is safe.thats how it usually goes .
 
No I don't.

I don't support the AFL, I support my club only.

But at the risk of labouring this, if you allow other clubs to close, you will be in a league by yourself. Maybe a league of your own appeals, but not to most.
 
But at the risk of labouring this, if you allow other clubs to close, you will be in a league by yourself. Maybe a league of your own appeals, but not to most.

Get rid of Melbourne and bring in a Tasmanian team. That would be more interesting.
 
Get rid of Melbourne and bring in a Tasmanian team. That would be more interesting.

Troll, that is not worth another response.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I can't believe the number of posters who think Neeld should stay. Whatever message he has, the players aren't listening. He's lost the group. Time for a new voice. It can get worse keeping him on. Agents will keep working behind the scenes for trades or free agency and hit confirm the second the opportunity "officially" opens. Showing a bit of fight under an interim in the last dozen or so rounds could at least get the team a FNF game when the fixture comes out for 2014. Neeld should have gone last year rather than get a free pass for all the blame to be put on Bailey. Definitely should have been sacked after round 1. As long as he stays Melbourne are a non-entity. But hey, I'm just a bloodthirsty Bigfooty poster, ignore me and keep him!
 
Logic says you don't contribute much to the AFL landscape thus you wouldn't be missed much a few years down the track.

So I take it you were lobbying for Carlton's removal throughout those previous 10 years Gus?

Bet that must've made life interesting for you around the club eh...
 
The attitude from many of the Dees posters in this thread is why he has to go, and he has to go now. Posters like PuppetMaster are potting him who defended the appointment, when it's supporters like him - who were presumably doing so in the "real world" as well - that are reaching breaking point and giving up. It happened under Knights at Essendon and when it happens the coach has to go.
 
there is no question - he must go

whether it is his fault or not...irrelevant

he has been unable to motivate the playing group in any way -- the number 1 job of a coach, at the most basic level
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom