- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Posts
- 17,642
- Reaction score
- 12,907
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
It does not bother me at all.Classic eagles fan response.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

It does not bother me at all.Classic eagles fan response.
Nah, the GF is played at the MCG. Freo would know about that having played in it last year.
Lyon is not going to play someone who is not giving his all. I just dont rate him that highly off his Melbourne days. He is a poor man Headland.
Eagle and Liverpool fan, no doubt he's been watching the History channel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The following were in fact out: Hodge, Mitchell, Sewell, Lake, Shiels, Rioli, Whitecross, Anderson. And Rohan is playing in the ****ing twos.Yeah I am, because of how much the Hawks go on about their amazing depth.
Hawks still had guys like Rioli, Lewis and Burgoyne running through their midfield. We had Derickx as our replacement for our loss.
Hawks still had Gibson, Schoenmakers and Cheney as their KPD to make up for Lake.
Hawks were in the game going into the last quarter and they choked. Simple as that.
As I said before if we were missing Hanners and Kennedy I wouldn't whinge about it. In fact we missed 8/9 of our Best 22 last year and we just got on with it.
The following were in fact out: Hodge, Mitchell, Sewell, Lake, Shiels, Rioli, Whitecross, Anderson. And Rohan is playing in the ******* twos.

Rioli played a half.Cheer cheer the red and the white.
Rioli played chump.
That's almost in Casboult territoryHe converted shots at goal at 25%. He is Giroudesque at shooting.
He can't admit it though because he can only see out of one eye.Rioli played a half.
If buddy had only played a half he would have had 0.5 or something stupid.
As stated before, if everyone else disagrees with you, you're probably wrong.
No problem being one eyed as long as you can admit it.
Rioli played a half.
If buddy had only played a half he would have had 0.5 or something stupid.
As stated before, if everyone else disagrees with you, you're probably wrong.
No problem being one eyed as long as you can admit it.
He can't admit it though because he can only see out of one eye.
Of course you don't give a toss, because if you did it would be admitting you're in the wrong.

Lol except the majority of the Swans board agrees that the Hawks are being a pack of whingers, so don't really give a toss.
Lol except the majority of the Swans board agrees that the Hawks are being a pack of whingers, so don't really give a toss.

That's like saying the majority of the Essendon fans agree we didn't do any dodgy drug programs so we must be innocent. Citing the worst references to support your case
You're just merely trolling now, you were always a sore loser supporting Hull, but I guess you are a sore winner as well when actually supporting a club that wins something

Haha, this is getting better and better
So the swans board agree, so you must be right! Brilliant. At least you know where you can seek the validation you need to reassure your nagging insecurities. Good for you![]()

Ok, how about all the Hawks fans pre-match who were still floggishly arrogant that they would win? Or do they not count because they said something different after the loss.![]()
I'm an Essendon supporter, why would I care what happens between Hawks and Swans?
The tears are flowing because we are so sad that you actually believe half the rubbish that you actually sprout out, such delusional people makes it very sad to live in this world