cleveland
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 25, 2005
- 10,639
- 4,390
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
Theres something about the rat I like too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Theres something about the rat I like too
Nathan Hrovat to win Rising Star. Potentially the best kid I have seen at Bulldogs in last 25 years. Go Rat.
It's like trying to decide which of your children you love most.I think Hrovat is the most well rounded of the draftees, hard to see a weakness in his game unless you count his height. The others I think have a special attribute or two that he doesn't have, (Macrae's spatial awareness, Hunter's vision, Stringer's strength and potentially speed) but don't have the same well rounded game.
It's like trying to decide which of your children you love most.
FWIW there be something about this foursome from last year. Unlike some of our draftees from previous years, these guys exude an absolute confidence in themselves. I think their own expectations of themselves are all very high. They all expect to be starting regulars in our 22 during 2014, and would be mega pissed at themselves if it were not to eventuate. All 4 have shown they can tear games apart at VFL standard.
I have this feeling that Macrae will become a great player for our club ever since he's gained the kg i strongly believe he's gonna have a great year running through the midfield or across half back.
Ok want the stats on johno hawkins and even mr football you will find this kid is way in front -love him boys our wings od bon and mcrae are as classy as the club will ever see
wut.Ok want the stats on johno hawkins and even mr football you will find this kid is way in front -love him boys our wings od bon and mcrae are as classy as the club will ever see
That's fine mate and I appreciate your passion, but I feel this in depth analysis would be better served on players with at least 3 years on our list. Nobody really knows how these boys are going to end up. The only thing I am convinced of, for their age they are in privileged position, and have been chosen by our club because of their ability. They are 18 year olds working their guts out trying to achieve their dream. As for my comprehension, who cares.
The only thing I would say re your argument that players will know to expect his side step when forced onto his right side is : At pace instinct tends to take over for most players [ yes very experienced and particularly alert players will remember and sweat on him because of it] most of the time. My observation is that lefties tend to get away with it far more often than right footers. Instinct does take over more often than not when time to think and remember is limited, which helps explain why lefties get away with more than their right footed counterparts.
Have you been reading my mind??? FWIW Macrae was putting on the moves at training today wrong footing guys left right and centre and if that wasn't enough to make you drool the Bontman was cutting a rug with the midfield group himself...
Yep, I can't disagree with any of that. My point on Macrae wasn't intended to be a baseless slight against him or anything of the sort, it was just an opinion on the Anderson vs. Macrae debate - in which both of them have only had a year. Am enjoying watching both of them develop and as you mentioned earlier, Macrae's first year was fantastic. He could well prove me wrong and become an elite player - which I'd be really happy with, obviously.
You make a great point re: instinct, however I'd argue that this is reduced a little when you're talking about 'top-line players'. In this case I'm assuming Macrae goes on to be somewhere between very good and elite, in which case this sort of weakness is going to be brought up in every single brief for every single team before they play us. If, by the time he makes a name for himself, he hasn't improved this side of his game, you're going to have every opposition midfielder targeting it and being aware of it. While instinct does play a part, and lefties do indeed get away with more, this sort of limitation becomes more of an issue as the player gets better as it gets a lot of focus in team meetings and the like. On the basis of this I think it sits as a 'wall' between very good and elite, rather than a barrier that he needs to break through to become a good player, if that makes sense.
As with most things Dannnnnn, I have little argument with your position, except....does that not assume that as his opponents come to terms with this perceived weakness in his game, he will not either overcome that weakness, with the aid of good coaching, or like so many players with a recognised weakness before him, find a way around those who work to his weakness?
Cross and West were never great kicks for instance. So they tended to kick within their limitations, and became extraordinarily good with their hands to compensate. Do you truly believe the current level of Macrae's game is as good as it is ever going to get, or that he and the coaches are incapable of improving or varying his play?
If I could like this post 50 times I would. Did Hrovat and Prudden train? How are they looking injury wise?
You raise a good point in that his sidestep is a better fall back than many players have, but the problem I see is when you pair it with his other attributes. His kick isn't great; in fact it was rated either poor or below average (will have to double check this when I have the figures in front of me) by CD. They have some flawed systems but kick rating is generally very good. Considering 65% of Macrae's disposals were uncontested, that's a pretty telling stat. He has the vision but I don't think he has the execution from both the stats and from watching closely. When coupled with his very poor non-preferred I think it makes him a pretty easy player to target. None of our players are Sam Mitchell-level even on both sides, but most of them are at least reasonable and can use it when they're forced to. Macrae seems to have no confidence in it at all, and from the little I've seen it's not very good at all.On McCrae, the fact he has a sidestep at all is a better fallback position than most players will have when put in a difficult position. He is competent on his left already. Most players will only ever have their preferred boot to get out of trouble. McCrae is already effectively 1 up. How many of our preferred right footers can kick on their left? Can't think of 1 but happy to be corrected. If McCrae can develop a right foot he will be so far above the majority of the competition with a left, right and a sidestep. At the moment we settle for 2 out of 3 which already elevates above average and hope he can achieve the 3 (I've no doubt he/they'll be working on it). Add to that his already exposed work rate, tackling and vision and I have few concerns. We are simply spoiled at the moment and splitting off season hairs. Fact is there doesn't appear to be a dud amongst our top end reruits and even the mid rounders look good/promising. We've struck the jackpot and a flag is close.
I agree with this!Champion data stats are only that stats, they can be very misleading. They should only a guide and should be used as such.
A good example of this was Luke Dahlhaus in is draft year, he and Michael Turner were so frustrated with recruiters continuely over looking him for his so called really poor disposable, he was leading tackler in TAC, and his stats were very good in all other areas.
This frustration led Michael and Luke to sent a DVD to all clubs of Luke's highlights, showing where he got his possessions, which were mainly in and under and always under pressure. This showed the reason for his poor disposable.
Thank god our recruiters gave him a chance. I believe sats have a place, but that's it, only a place. They are not gospel and must be put into context.
Sidenote - I grew up next to mick turner in ocean grove. He and diesel Williams would come over for dinner when mick's wife was away cos they couldn't cook. Nice fella.Champion data stats are only that stats, they can be very misleading. They should only a guide and should be used as such.
A good example of this was Luke Dahlhaus in is draft year, he and Michael Turner were so frustrated with recruiters continuely over looking him for his so called really poor disposable, he was leading tackler in TAC, and his stats were very good in all other areas.
This frustration led Michael and Luke to sent a DVD to all clubs of Luke's highlights, showing where he got his possessions, which were mainly in and under and always under pressure. This showed the reason for his poor disposable.
Thank god our recruiters gave him a chance. I believe sats have a place, but that's it, only a place. They are not gospel and must be put into context.
I did a bit of junior development early days with Vic Fuller and Kevin Sheahan, I understand where you are coming from.Good Bloke.Sidenote - I grew up next to mick turner in ocean grove. He and diesel Williams would come over for dinner when mick's wife was away cos they couldn't cook. Nice fella.