- Aug 9, 2012
- 11,162
- 6,123
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Banned
- #851
Just revealed by Brad Scott on SEN that Boaks management initially approached North.
Interesting.
Interesting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please tell me that your day job does not involve driving any heavy machinery near other people. I'd take Clark over Boak, but none of the others. Melbourne's sitting near the bottom of the ladder for a reason - their players aren't very good.Clark
Frawley
Watts
Jones
Grimes
Howe
Jamar
Blease
T McDonald
Trengove
Boak wouldnt be ahead of any of them, and Im not interested in him at the MFC at all. Very overrated player
Or his 20 touches and no goals against GWS31 disposals and a goal against the premiership favourites isn't too bad for a B-grader. Would be Melbourne's best player.
Was still one of the Power's best on a schisen day.Or his 20 touches and no goals against GWS
Just revealed by Brad Scott on SEN that Boaks management initially approached North.
Interesting.
The issue North Melbourne has this season is we have a lot of rookie upgrades we have committed to.
Mahal Daw is contracted for 2013 and has served his 3 years as a rookie while Aaron Mullett and Sam Gibson would rightfully expect to be promoted. After both Luke Delaney and Cam Pederson were promote last year we only selected two players in Brad McKenzie & Tom Curran.
If we're to use our 1st pick to secure a Travis Boak, we may find ourselves out of the draft completely.
The issue North Melbourne has this season is we have a lot of rookie upgrades we have committed to.
Mahal Daw is contracted for 2013 and has served his 3 years as a rookie while Aaron Mullett and Sam Gibson would rightfully expect to be promoted. After both Luke Delaney and Cam Pederson were promote last year we only selected two players in Brad McKenzie & Tom Curran.
If we're to use our 1st pick to secure a Travis Boak, we may find ourselves out of the draft completely.
Hence why it would be our 1st pick and a player....like Greenwood
Both of those deals i would do, would perfer a pick over melksham/pears o well won't happen
I rate Melksham, Monfries is underrate tooAre you serious? If we trade Boak for Monfries and Melksham/Pears then they may as well shut the club down now. Wouldn't trade him for all three of them, none of them are much good.
Monfries + Melksham/Pears
Depending if they need a tall or extra mid
But you don't have a first round pick because of Daniher1st round pick plus Pears/Melksham is more like it.
We could get one.B
But you don't have a first round pick because of Daniher
Yes, but for whom? Plus surely you're going to go after Caddy, you'd be silly not to.We could get one.
Bellchambers could get us one, of course this is purely hypothetical.Yes, but for whom? Plus surely you're going to go after Caddy, you'd be silly not to.
He probably could. For a scary second there I thought you were going to suggest Angus Monfries.Bellchambers could get us one, of course this is purely hypothetical.
I'm interested to hear what Port Adelaide supporters think of that trade.
NM: Travis Boak
PA: Pick ~13 + Levi Greenwood
if your pick was still around the 7/8 mark, and greenwood hadnt played 5 games at 13 disposals per a game this year than it might've drawn some interest.