Undervalued Cricketers
- Thread starter PhatBoy
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I'll go the other way. He was of most value to the team in the top-order, due to his weaknesses.
He actually struggled more batting lower in the order especially starting against spin with his heavy feet, preferring the pace on the ball and gaps in the field (more catchers) faced when opening. He was easily in the top 6 batsman in the country for most of his career, and when fit arguably in the top 6-10 bowlers too.
But by batting in the top order, the media and general public just couldn't get passed his batting position, to see what he offered the team opening or at 3. They compared him to Ponting/Martyn/Waugh as a batsman, ignoring his all-round ability because he was batting "at 3".
He was also ridiculously unlucky with the review system. I remember reading stats once that something like 80% of his referrals were "umpire's call" (and whilst still given out, would not have cost a review under current rules). His style of 'plonking' his front foot at the line of the ball was obviously like a red rag to a bull to the umpires - his reputation saw him lose any benefit of the doubt in borderline decisions.
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,750
- 12,107
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #53
Watson certainly a lot more consistent
. Could have been our Tamba Bavuma but who can also bowl.- Thread starter
- #54
Watson certainly a lot more consistent
In some respects perhaps. Stokes passes 50 once every 4 innings. Watson passed 50 once every 3.9 innings. With the ball it’s no contest. I’d back Watson to get 20-30 easily over Stokes, so I can see how the consistency thing applies.
Mark Waugh.
Never seen a better fielder and he was such a classy bat to watch.
Never seen a better fielder and he was such a classy bat to watch.
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,750
- 12,107
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #56
Fair point which is certainly a valid argument to say it was more valuable to the team to have Watto at the top and a batsman at 6. I suppose my point was more as soon as he started batting in the top order people expected he'd turn out pure batsman numbers rather than all-rounder numbers. Whereas if he batted 6 the public would have been a lot more accepting of his mid-30s average.
Gordon Greenidge. Never seen a better opener in my time. Man, could he hit the ball.
Imran Khan. Genuine fast bowler that had wicked inswingers. He taught most others after him for Pakistan how to reverse swing with old ball too.
Richard Hadlee - Second to only Dennis Lillee in terms of most talented quick bowlers I seen.
What a talent and amazing era of truly great fast bowlers. Hated the arrogant prick too. But he was ******* good.
What a talent and amazing era of truly great fast bowlers. Hated the arrogant prick too. But he was ******* good.
Second best swing bowler in my time of watching that we produced. Only Terry Alderman could trump him as an outswinger but Flemo had a bit more pace than Alderman. Pity injuries and strong era reduced him to so few Tests but I loved watching him bowl. I miss seeing a genuine outswinger. They seem so hard to find now. Stupid ******* Warney robbed him of a second test hat trick. I think I was angry as Flemo when Warne dropped it.
monty1104
Premium Platinum
Damien Martyn - just a really nice batsman to watch. Second only to Lara of the players I’ve seen play (not saying he is second BEST, but just really enjoyable to watch)
Ian Bishop - absolutely fantastic bowler, but always lives in the shadows of Walsh/Ambrose
Saqlain Mushtaq - a finger spinning off spinner in the time where Warne/Murali/Kumble we’re dominating as wrist spinners. Wasn’t as good as those three, but really, no one ever has been or likely will be.
Ian Bishop - absolutely fantastic bowler, but always lives in the shadows of Walsh/Ambrose
Saqlain Mushtaq - a finger spinning off spinner in the time where Warne/Murali/Kumble we’re dominating as wrist spinners. Wasn’t as good as those three, but really, no one ever has been or likely will be.
Fun fact that may be known,
Kasper did NOT actually glove the ball. Had there been a review system back in those days (and assuming the reviews hadn't been blown), he would have been able to stay in and potentially win that test.
Additionally, Warne's famous 99 against NZ was an uncalled no ball by Vettori I think it was. Warney actually touched his bat down at the other end and he should have a test century to his name.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Phil Jaques. Only played 11 tests but scored 3 100s and 6 50s. Unlucky to be cut down by injury but looked a test quality opener after Langer retired.
Brad Hogg. Most ODI wickets for Australia by any spinner not named Shane Warne. Regularly bowled 10 over economical spells and would pick up important wickets. Batsmen struggled to get after him and many couldn't pick him out of the hand. Would have been a T20I mainstay if he wasn't already 97 years old when it kicked off. Didn't do a lot in his handful of tests over a decade or so but wasn't helped by Ponting's captaincy in his last few. I remember watching him beat the bat a few times against India and then Ponting would set an in out field with no slip. Scored an important 79 in the infamous SCG test, too.
Brad Hogg. Most ODI wickets for Australia by any spinner not named Shane Warne. Regularly bowled 10 over economical spells and would pick up important wickets. Batsmen struggled to get after him and many couldn't pick him out of the hand. Would have been a T20I mainstay if he wasn't already 97 years old when it kicked off. Didn't do a lot in his handful of tests over a decade or so but wasn't helped by Ponting's captaincy in his last few. I remember watching him beat the bat a few times against India and then Ponting would set an in out field with no slip. Scored an important 79 in the infamous SCG test, too.
Hogg was a brilliant ODI bowler, best in the world there for a good period of time. Unfortunately that very aggressive style of bowling didn't lend itself to tests so much (though I do agree Ponting's captaincy of spinners left much to be desired).
On that note, for ODI excellence the reputation Nathan Bracken also suffers unfairly for his lack of impact in test cricket.
EDIT: And yeah good point on Jaques. He wasn't nicknamed Pro for nothing, just a high quality, no-fuss competent run machine who didn't quite get the test career he deserved in between Hayden finishing up and his debilitating injuries.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Hogg is like Brett Lee, he relished the batsman needing to go after him rather than just seeing him off so did well in ODI cricket. Ponting had Warne for 34 tests after Warne had already played 100 odd so he did his own thing. Ponting was never going to say 'nah I think we need a deep backward square instead of bat pad' to Warne. Once Warne finished up and we had the great spin crisis of the 2000s there was more onus on the captain on how to use the spinner.
Good shout, Andrew G was awesome for us at the 2007 WC also. Bowled swing with the new ball then cutters and cross seamers with the old. Proper limited overs bowler, even though his hair looked ridiculous.
Plugger35
The umpires are always right!
- Sep 27, 2008
- 136,030
- 156,731
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Subiaco
I wouldn't say either of these two were undervalued, they were widely regarded as two of the best all rounders of their era and of all time.
ZEV
Premium Platinum
- Jul 23, 2013
- 5,370
- 7,063
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Has a higher batting average and lower bowling average than Mitchell Marsh...
- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Marcus North.
Inconsistent enough to be a third Marsh brother but scored 100s in England (Wales), South Africa, NZ and England yet somehow never at home. Averaged 35 with the bat and took 14 wickets @ 42 bowling part time offies and everyone wanted him gone.
Inconsistent enough to be a third Marsh brother but scored 100s in England (Wales), South Africa, NZ and England yet somehow never at home. Averaged 35 with the bat and took 14 wickets @ 42 bowling part time offies and everyone wanted him gone.
I didn't!
- Thread starter
- #70
He scored all but one of his centuries with the side 4-down for less than 200 as well from memory, ie. the point at which the innings is poised to go one of two ways. Very undervalued.
- Feb 6, 2013
- 12,443
- 17,240
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Considering he admitted to using ball tampering to do that I'm not sure those after him would want him to have credit for teaching them:
- Feb 6, 2013
- 12,443
- 17,240
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Like Hauritz another victim of playing in the team immediately after the greatest side of all time broke up. Average test numbers which looked terrible compared to what came before, but would be what the current side would be built around (although you couldn't build a lineup around the Marcus North roulette).
- Feb 6, 2013
- 12,443
- 17,240
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I think a lot of the great bats of the 90's/00's who couldn't displace the golden lineup are undervalued compared to Hodge because they didn't whine to the press as much during and after their careers; i.e. Martin Love, Phil Jaques, Stuart Law, Di Venuto.
- Jun 23, 2008
- 33,485
- 27,225
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
214 Test wickets at 30.28, basically on workrate and heart, is worthy of much more respect that it gets. Doesn't make him one of our all-time greatest pace bowlers, but puts him in the company of those second-tier solid servants like Merv Hughes (his spiritual predecessor), Billy McDermott, Geoff Lawson, etc.
