- Thread starter
- #26
Pretty sure it's the Hurricanes main home ground, got upgraded for the recent RU world cup
Yep, that makes sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure it's the Hurricanes main home ground, got upgraded for the recent RU world cup
Imagine the travel from WA > Wellington or Wellington > WA.
Awful.
EDIT: Over 7 hours. I guess A-league teams do it, but a completely different game.
"purpose built" AFL stadium, the answer is 'yes'.
In the lead-in to the match, one of the TV boffins claims it was a purpose-built AFL ground, don't shoot the messenger.
Definitely is Hurrivcaes home ground. I'm not sure if it got upgraded for the RWC or not, as the whole stadium is new.Pretty sure it's the Hurricanes main home ground, got upgraded for the recent RU world cup
Perth is way bigger than Adelaide and to that poster who suggested Perth with be bigger than Brisbane, well possibly but Brisbane can't expand further along the coastline as there is the GC and Sunny Coast. So I highly doubt any Perth Metro area will get to 3.5 million people.
The problem with Tassie is that there are only two genuine options (Hobart & Launceston) which are at opposite ends of the island so there is never the liklihood of generating huge crowds. The population of the whole state was 512,100 in March 2012 so their people are spread way too thin.
The population of Hobart is 211,000. Launceston is 106,000.
The population of Wellington is 395,000. It's hardly an untapped growth market.
The Western Sydney region (which is actually in Australia) is home to 1.6m people, and they get 10,000 people to a home game on a good day.
The population of Tassie's two biggest cities is 75K less than Wellington and the Kiwis are all in the one place.
They also don't like football.
There are 8 million people in New York City, why don't we put a team there?
No, Brisbane has a larger population than Perth, Adelaide does not. It is quite feasible that in the next decade Perth will overtake Brisbane.Brisbane & Adelaide have Perth covered and Darwin is just another Geelong.
By the way, any coincidence that the AFL promotional ads this season show people in other countries watching our game ?? Maybe a conspiracy theory but its all adding up to me.
how about a team in jakartaTravel time and time difference for TV broadcasts .............. silly argument there !!
Heard the ground is as long as the SCG (so horribly small) but is also 20m thinner too.
Sounds like a terrible ground...would be far to quick to move the ball.
The problem with Tassie is that there are only two genuine options (Hobart & Launceston) which are at opposite ends of the island so there is never the liklihood of generating huge crowds. The population of the whole state was 512,100 in March 2012 so their people are spread way too thin.
Definitely is Hurrivcaes home ground. I'm not sure if it got upgraded for the RWC or not, as the whole stadium is new.
It is an oval for limited overs cricket; 50 and 20 overs; with Tests I believe still played at the Basin Reserve. Like most NZ cricket grounds, it is small by Australian standard due to being a snug fit for a rugby field.
Dimensions are 152m x 120m IIRC.Not what I heard and not what I saw
I heard it's slightly longer than the SCG and just as wide as Docklands.
It looked bigger than the SCG regardless, no way is it smaller than that
Take Friday off, 4 day New Zealand weekend.Yeah, nah. There is a large number of Aus based supporters travelling for the novelty value and I'd be interested how many of the rest actually paid for their seat.
Brisbane isn't far off from agglomerating with GC's metro area is it? Perth is about 5 or so years away from cracking 2 mill but yeah it's not going to overtake Brisbane anytime soon (if ever).