Remove this Banner Ad

West Coast - When will the AFL step in?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Still can't believe they chose Hawthorn's first over Carlton's in the Barrass trade.

It feels like they need someone slightly better credentialled than Don Pyke steering the ship more than they need draft assistance.
Always easier to look at these things in hindsight. At the beginning of the year lots of people thought it was Carlton's "time".
 
I look at it this way when Port bottomed out in 2010-11 it had more to do with money than anything else. We had an assistant coach who was from the Ammos not even the SANFL. Our turnover was so bad due to the dud deal we got from the SANFL.
This is a problem West Coast will never have. Now our finances have been fixed we just need to make sure we don't bottom out playing wise in a huge way. West Coast wouldn't be so bad without the injuries you've had but the Kelly deal was always too much of a risk.

What SANFL deal ruined Port?

25 years ago?

And how is that even relevant today?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I look at it this way when Port bottomed out in 2010-11 it had more to do with money than anything else. We had an assistant coach who was from the Ammos not even the SANFL. Our turnover was so bad due to the dud deal we got from the SANFL.
This is a problem West Coast will never have. Now our finances have been fixed we just need to make sure we don't bottom out playing wise in a huge way. West Coast wouldn't be so bad without the injuries you've had but the Kelly deal was always too much of a risk.
Keep in mind that the salary cap in 2010 or 2011 was 8.2 million dollars and the 92.5 percent minimum was 7.6 million.

I wished those rules were still there as if the playing salary cap was 20 million, then 18.5 million would be 92.5 percent or 18 million would be 90 percent.

The narrative on Port Adelaide's side is the SANFL screwed them over. That is true. But in 2012, it didn't help when Port Adelaide struggled to average 20,000 people at home games.

Had Port Adelaide averaged 25,000 people a game at $30 a ticket, they would be turning a small profit or at worst break even.

I still remember going to a Dockers vs suns game in 2011 (Matty Pavlich 250th game). 30,000 rocked up and the average ticket price was $50. So.... $1.5 million times 11 home games was $16.5 million a year in ticket sales.

Port looked like a struggling Victorian side Hosting Docklands games in 2010 to 2012.
 
Keep in mind that the salary cap in 2010 or 2011 was 8.2 million dollars and the 92.5 percent minimum was 7.6 million.

I wished those rules were still there as if the playing salary cap was 20 million, then 18.5 million would be 92.5 percent or 18 million would be 90 percent.

The narrative on Port Adelaide's side is the SANFL screwed them over. That is true. But in 2012, it didn't help when Port Adelaide struggled to average 20,000 people at home games.

Had Port Adelaide averaged 25,000 people a game at $30 a ticket, they would be turning a small profit or at worst break even.

I still remember going to a Dockers vs suns game in 2011 (Matty Pavlich 250th game). 30,000 rocked up and the average ticket price was $50. So.... $1.5 million times 11 home games was $16.5 million a year in ticket sales.

Port looked like a struggling Victorian side Hosting Docklands games in 2010 to 2012.
Problem was we could have been getting 30,000 at Football Park and the SANFL would have got the bulk of the cash, It wasn't the crowd numbers, it was the stadium deal. Saying that it would have been better if it was 30k.
Every club would suffer somewhat when you're bottom 4 but there were a collision of negative things that came at the same time. I was doing some work for Port around this time member numbers were down, people didn't want to go to Football Park for a number of reasons.
 
Problem was we could have been getting 30,000 at Football Park and the SANFL would have got the bulk of the cash, It wasn't the crowd numbers, it was the stadium deal. Saying that it would have been better if it was 30k.
Every club would suffer somewhat when you're bottom 4 but there were a collision of negative things that came at the same time. I was doing some work for Port around this time member numbers were down, people didn't want to go to Football Park for a number of reasons.
Sorry but I call bulls**t on this. Yes Port Adelaide power or Port Adelaide magpies in the SANFL are arrogant and hated

If Port Adelaide averaged 40,000 people at $25 a ticket. That's $1 million dollars a game so that $11 million dollars in 2011 when the salary was 7.6 million at a minimum.

You think the SANFL was gonna put most of its money on the 9 SANFL clubs? I doubt it when each SANFL clubs salary cap is $400,000.

Also clubs like Glenelg, South Adelaide, west Adelaide all have pokies. So at least rule those 3 out needing Port Adelaide power money.

Also Port Adelaide magpies have pokies too.
 
They need a lot of help. Shocking levels of despair. Been going on since half way of 2021 their levels of badness. They seriously need about 5 top picks at least just to build something.

When will the AFL step in and save them?
I don't think the AFL need to step in and save west coast. On field they have been bad for 4 seasons.

But off field? Well this isn't Port Adelaide of 2008 to 2011 when they lost 2 to 3 million dollars a year. Port Adelaide in 2012 lost 6.5 million dollars that season.

West coast eagles are making profits. Last I heard, they have 50 to 60 million dollars worth of assets.

West coast won't bleed to death anytime soon. Not financially anyway
 
Sorry but I call bulls**t on this. Yes Port Adelaide power or Port Adelaide magpies in the SANFL are arrogant and hated

If Port Adelaide averaged 40,000 people at $25 a ticket. That's $1 million dollars a game so that $11 million dollars in 2011 when the salary was 7.6 million at a minimum.

You think the SANFL was gonna put most of its money on the 9 SANFL clubs? I doubt it when each SANFL clubs salary cap is $400,000.

Also clubs like Glenelg, South Adelaide, west Adelaide all have pokies. So at least rule those 3 out needing Port Adelaide power money.

Also Port Adelaide magpies have pokies too.
You are talking about a time where the SANFL wouldn't cover any Port Adelaide AFL debts when they owned the license which means they owned the club in real terms. They were actively trying to get the license transferred to Tasmania all due to their petty hatred for Port. The SANFL were doing everything in their power to destroy the club.

When the AFL clubs eventually went to Adelaide Oval, the SANFL got paid out for the 2 licenses, sold Football Park and I believe got a huge payout. That money went somewhere, probably paid off SANFL debt.

Not sure you realise the level of animosity there was and still is to a degree.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Another belting. To a team that blew an 8 goal lead with a quarter to go last week.

They need more than one PP. They need 5.
 
You are talking about a time where the SANFL wouldn't cover any Port Adelaide AFL debts when they owned the license which means they owned the club in real terms. They were actively trying to get the license transferred to Tasmania all due to their petty hatred for Port. The SANFL were doing everything in their power to destroy the club.

When the AFL clubs eventually went to Adelaide Oval, the SANFL got paid out for the 2 licenses, sold Football Park and I believe got a huge payout. That money went somewhere, probably paid off SANFL debt.

Not sure you realise the level of animosity there was and still is to a degree.
Port Magpies arrogance got you partially into this mess in the 1st place.

I do know the animosity the SANFL have towards your club. You went behind the SANFLs back in the middle of 1990 to get your own AFL side.

SANFL had to step in and create the crows
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Port Magpies arrogance got you partially into this mess in the 1st place.

I do know the animosity the SANFL have towards your club. You went behind the SANFLs back in the middle of 1990 to get your own AFL side.

SANFL had to step in and create the crows
Missed the bit where it was in response to Norwood going behind everyone's back to get in first.

Would the SANFL have got a High Court injunction against Norwood - no chance.
 
Missed the bit where it was in response to Norwood going behind everyone's back to get in first.

Would the SANFL have got a High Court injunction against Norwood - no chance.
That Norwood AFL or VFL bid was in the early 1980s. This was when Norwood finally broke their 25 year flag drought in 1975.

They then won Further flags in 1978, 1982 and 1984.

If there was any other club that had a massive fan base like the Port Adelaide magpies in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, It was Norwood.

I follow South Adelaide in the SANFL. And I even know if there is one other club in the SANFL that could have their own AFL license, it would be the Norwood red legs
 

Remove this Banner Ad

West Coast - When will the AFL step in?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top