![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/carlton.png)
- Jun 9, 2008
- 12,104
- 11,602
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Would North Melbourne's "best team of the 21st century" even make the top 4 in 2024?
Serious question.
Serious question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Finals Wk 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 1 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think the team listed by the OP would be better with Lynch in as a key forward (with Riewoldt), moving Richo to the wing, amd getting rid of Grigg. Also would bring in Shai Bolton and get rid of Astbury. That would bring in some outside speed and run
RUNVS how on Earth is LRT in there ahead of Leo Barry, a two time AA? That's a big upgrade and better for team balance.
Would North Melbourne's "best team of the 21st century" even make the top 4 in 2024?
Serious question.
I'd say yes but it was a harder call that I expected it to be when you posed the question.
It lacks star power but I think they'd still make it only because the bottom 6 (of any 23 year rep side) is going to be stronger than the bottom 6 of any single season side. Still, to have only a couple of AA players in a rep side really is surprising.
Had it been from '97 onwards (i.e. since the last team of the century), it would have looked a hell of a lot stronger.
A club that hasn't won a final in the last 20 years (85% of the time period in question), are the second best team of the 20th century?Geelong, their record is clearly the best in the 21st century over a long period of time.
Essendon in 2000 was a great team, but didn't go on with it and was overshadowed by Brisbane.
Brisbane, the triple flag wins were amazing without ever finishing on top in any of those years.
Hawthorn is the 4th best but has had an ordinary last few years
The Essendon team of 2000 was virtually unbeatable, that season alone puts them up there and while i acknowledge their past 20 years haven't been so good and they should've won at least 3 flags with that team, i cannot place Brisbane or Hawthrorn ahead of them. Their season is incomparable in the modern era, only my team Geelong went close in 2008, but we blew the GF. The difference is Geelong won more flags, won the most H&A games and played more finals. Those who didn't see that Essendon team play are the only ones who will be critical.A club that hasn't won a final in the last 20 years (85% of the time period in question), are the second best team of the 20th century?
The Essendon team of 2000 was virtually unbeatable, that season alone puts them up there and while i acknowledge their past 20 years haven't been so good and they should've won at least 3 flags with that team, i cannot place Brisbane or Hawthrorn ahead of them. Their season is incomparable in the modern era, only my team Geelong went close in 2008, but we blew the GF. The difference is Geelong won more flags, won the most H&A games and played more finals. Those who didn't see that Essendon team play are the only ones who will be critical.
So even though Essendon 2000 were better than any individual Geelong team, Geelong trumps them based on their performances in other seasons, but no other teams are assessed based on their performances over multiple seasons when we are considering a 24 year period?The Essendon team of 2000 was virtually unbeatable, that season alone puts them up there and while i acknowledge their past 20 years haven't been so good and they should've won at least 3 flags with that team, i cannot place Brisbane or Hawthrorn ahead of them. Their season is incomparable in the modern era, only my team Geelong went close in 2008, but we blew the GF. The difference is Geelong won more flags, won the most H&A games and played more finals. Those who didn't see that Essendon team play are the only ones who will be critical.
IMO the Geelong team of 2008 was better than Essendon of 2000, (Then stumbled) but the thread is titled "Which is the best team of the 21st century" not era. Brisbane never finished on top in any of their Premiership years and while winning 3 flags in a row was a great effort, i don't think any of their teams was better than Essendon of 2000. Sure they won in 2001, but in their only meeting in 2000 Essendon won by 64 points against the 5th placed Lions at the Gabba. I'll stick to them being the 2nd best team i've seen. I suppose you could argue the 21st century begins on January 1st, 2001. In that case, i will move Richmond into the top 4 and change to:So even though Essendon 2000 were better than any individual Geelong team, Geelong trumps them based on their performances in other seasons, but no other teams are assessed based on their performances over multiple seasons when we are considering a 24 year period?
And you can't place a team like Brisbane ahead of Essendon, because Essendon were so good that they 'should have won three flags', even though Brisbane actually won 3 consecutive flags, the first of which was against...... that mighty Essendon team?
Gotcha.
If you're talking one off teams based on a given season, I suggest any reasonable person would have Essendon 2000 on top, possibly of all time.IMO the Geelong team of 2008 was better than Essendon of 2000, (Then stumbled) but the thread is titled "Which is the best team of the 21st century" not era. Brisbane never finished on top in any of their Premiership years and while winning 3 flags in a row was a great effort, i don't think any of their teams was better than Essendon of 2000. Sure they won in 2001, but in their only meeting in 2000 Essendon won by 64 points against the 5th placed Lions at the Gabba. I'll stick to them being the 2nd best team i've seen. I suppose you could argue the 21st century begins on January 1st, 2001. In that case, i will move Richmond into the top 4 and change to:
Geelong
Brisbane
Hawthorn
Richmond.
So where does Essendon sit in the best teams of the 90s?
Brisbane ahead of Hawthorn. Even just that 2002/2003 GF would probably beat just about every other team.Geelong first, Hawthorn close second.
Daylight third.
I'm not sure there's daylight to third.Geelong first, Hawthorn close second.
Daylight third.
One of us has fundamentally misunderstood what this thread is. Are we arguing about which club has won the most stuff over the last 23 years, or are we arguing about which best 22 created over a span of careers over the the last 22 is the best? Your stats relate more towards the former. Comparing individuals would surely be a better means of considering the latter.I'm not sure there's daylight to third.
Using 2001 as the starting point, I do think there is a logical order as follows (multiple premiership winners listed):
View attachment 1846430
Sydney marginally ahead of Collingwood due to 5 more finals appearances, despite Collingwood getting to the final 4 on three more occasions. (this could go either way)
Collingwood marginally ahead of Brisbane. Despite one less flag, 5 more finals appearances, with 4 more top 4 finishes.
That isn't what is this thread is though is it? Aren't we comparing the best 22 you can make across all 23 years of this millenium? If that is the case I am taking hawthorn over Brisbane every day of the week. The mid and back lines wash each other out a bit, but the forward line discrepancy is pretty massive.Brisbane ahead of Hawthorn. Even just that 2002/2003 GF would probably beat just about every other team.
Yeah I know and disagree. I'm not so sure Hawthorn can compete against Brisbane's midfield. Voss, Black, Lappin, Neale is probably the best midfield lineup. Key forwards like Brown and Daniher and Bradshaw, supported by Akker, Pike, Cameron etc. There's 4 brownlow medallists in that team.That isn't what is this thread is though is it? Aren't we comparing the best 22 you can make across all 23 years of this millenium? If that is the case I am taking hawthorn over Brisbane every day of the week. The mid and back lines wash each other out a bit, but the forward line discrepancy is pretty massive.
It is true that is a pretty incredible starting midfield. I think the next four Hawthorn roll into their midfield are better than what Brisbane offer though. I saw some stats on the number of times Hawthorn won the clearance when roughhead was roving that were quite simply unbelievable on one of those panel TV shows about a decade ago, but could never find the stats again whilst searching online.Yeah I know and disagree. I'm not so sure Hawthorn can compete against Brisbane's midfield. Voss, Black, Lappin, Neale is probably the best midfield lineup. Key forwards like Brown and Daniher and Bradshaw, supported by Akker, Pike, Cameron etc. There's 4 brownlow medallists in that team.
You said it was daylight between Geelong and Hawthorn and the rest. I disagree. I think Brisbane is battling against Geelong for number 1.
For my 4 in no particular order I am going to have to go
Geelong - Hard to go passed them to be honest. Amazing defence, amazing midfield. Only slight knock, and it is only slight is I think there are better forward lines out there, but that is a pretty small knock.
Hawthorn - Amazing forward line, and amazing midfield. Both would be extremely hard to stop. Only small knocks, their rucks division is a little weak and their defence a tiny bit undersized, but a team would need to actually get the ball there in order to exploit that and that would be tough.
Brisbane - A little tougher here I will admit but their forward line consisting of Lynch, Brown, Aker, Brayshaw and so on would be super hard to stop. They may not have the depth of quality in their midfield as a few other clubs but they do have a few stars there. Their defence is very good as well.
West Coast - They have not been so good recently but that best 22 of the 21st century is filled with quality. Amazing midfield, a very strong forward line and a strong defence as well. Not sure how they would do against Geelong's best 22, but I feel like they would give it a crack.
ok....It is true that is a pretty incredible starting midfield. I think the next four Hawthorn roll into their midfield are better than what Brisbane offer though. I saw some stats on the number of times Hawthorn won the clearance when roughhead was roving that were quite simply unbelievable on one of those panel TV shows about a decade ago, but could never find the stats again whilst searching online.
Daniher and Brown vs Franklin and Roughhead is a pretty stark difference though. Michael and Leppitsh would be utterly demolished, whereas Lake and Croad should hold their own reasonably well.
Don't know why you bothered to tamper with the Brissy teams of 2001-2004.
Harris Andrews and Cameron might force their way onto the bench but that original side (let's say the 2002 GF team) Brisbane would absolutely WIPE THE FLOOR with any one of your other contrived "best of" sides.
They were a ruthless blend of power, speed, ball skills and attacking flair that took all before them.
so in order of merit it'd be:
1. Brisbane (under Matthews)
.....The length of the Flemington Straight
2. Geelong
3. Hawks (with Buddy)
4. Richmond (they did win 3 of 4)
But all you’re doing is choosing 1 yr, when they seemed to be past their peak.Well in the 2004 prelim as defending premiers they didn’t exactly wipe the floor with the kindergarten version of the 2007-11 Geelong side…. Which didn’t yet have Hawkins, Selwood, Ottens, Cameron, Dangerfield so not really sure on what basis you could say that a vastly improved version of that 2004 Cats side (the one that won a grand final by 20 goals 3 years later) plus about 1400 goals worth of key forward talent, a Brownlow and 14(?) all Australian jerseys in the midfield, an AA ruckman…..
You don’t think that would create a competitive game?
Edit: we also added two All Australian centre half backs into the mix within the next 6 years![]()