**** off. Why elbow someone. Flykick the campaigner in the face
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Wines on Langdon
- Thread starter drazah
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
**** off. Why elbow someone. Flykick the campaigner in the face
- Banned
- #77
lol what a suprise port fans dont think he did anything wrong...
What a stupid characterisation of what people have said. We actually looked at the rules and said what we thought they would grade it as ... and we were correct. He hasn't done anything more wrong than what about 100+ players have done over the past 5 years. As is always the case, if you choose to bump you risk hitting them high and injuring them. He got lucky that the player got straight up because if he didn't it would be the 1-2 weeks that everyone seems to be craving for on here.
cmon if he was a pies player and did that to one of your boys and he got off with a fine, your mob would be burning.
especially KOCH
he didnt attack the ball, he went for the man
Last edited:
Ok I've lost my marbles completely and melting hard.
The head isn't sacrosanct anymore? What the actual hell is going on?
F****** ***** **** off
MRP will be the death of me. What an absolute shambles.
The head isn't sacrosanct anymore? What the actual hell is going on?
F****** ***** **** off
MRP will be the death of me. What an absolute shambles.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Hahaha yes so much this.
You blokes were hard done by also. Can't believe I'm sticking up for you but where's the old potential rule gone?
- Aug 15, 2015
- 38,673
- 92,385
for a while now it's been based entirely on whether the bloke is injured.
if he was ko'ed it was 4 down to 3
as it was he was fine, so no weeks.
its stupid, but its what the MRP are doing. at the moment. until they change their minds again.
- Banned
- #82
Bullshit ... he was committed to bump him off his kick and hit him late/high. He did what every player is coached to do and executed the bump poorly. The guy is 6'2 and 97kg. If he wanted to hurt him he wouldn't have got up, tough or not. It intrigues me that you are so interested in the outcome. It wouldn't be because you're playing us for a spot in the finals and he smashed you last time we played?
- Jun 28, 2013
- 2,346
- 2,572
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Geelong Geelong Geelong
Chapman missed a final because of this.
Must be different when it's a Port player getting the bump.
Must be different when it's a Port player getting the bump.
- Banned
- #85
Do you think it might be reserved for special circumstances like intentionally king hitting a bloke or intentionally ramming someone into a post? Hodge got graded careless,high, medium impact. He got an extra week because he had already decked swallow that year. The careless aspect was very generous from the MRP, the medium as opposed to low impact could go either way. He got we he deserved and like Wines was very lucky that no one was hurt. If Wingard was knocked out, he would have got 4-6 weeks and might have cost Hawthorn a flag. The fact that you are trying to argue a late bump in a live play is the same as someone with their head over the ball in a dead play and rammed head first into a post is beyond me. But then again you guys were AFL's love child the week you played us, and hated them a week later, and are not known for your thought processes.
- Banned
- #86
What was it graded? Was it Low impact, High, Careless and he got done over by carry over points when they used to exist. Meaningless comparison without more information.
- Banned
- #87
Just checked. It was graded exactly the same as Wines it just carried a higher penalty back then. Thanks for proving my point.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-09-16/one-week-for-chapman
- Jun 28, 2013
- 2,346
- 2,572
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Geelong Geelong Geelong
Yeah head was sacrosanct back then and they've since relaxed the rules, NOT.
Probably cost us another flag. BACK THEN!!!!!!!
You had a point? Must have missed it.
Just wait a week and it may change again
- Banned
- #91
Did you want him to run straight across the guys leg and break it in half? You're more than welcome to go and have a look at it again in real time. He was 1-2metres away when the ball left the Collingwood players foot. He was committed to bump and if you want to slow the footage down to make it look terrible, you can also slow it down to see that his head was lower as he kicked it then when Wines committed to the bump a couple of seconds earlier. It is 6 inches to a foot lower which is the difference between a legal bump and an illegal one. I can see how people could think it was deliberate, but unlike other players in the comp Wines has a 100+ game career that proves otherwise. It still doesn't change the fact that Wines is lucky that he didn't hurt him, he just didn't intentionally hit him in the head.
- Jun 28, 2013
- 2,346
- 2,572
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Geelong Geelong Geelong
Port puffs trying to justify it is funny as.....
- Banned
- #94
Your attempts to make arguments that are as well thought out and nuanced as 'nah' are funnier.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I'm so confused? HoW did he get off, But you get a week now for a little punch?
That was fairly dirty. Late, high obviously he is lucky that Langdon got up.
That was fairly dirty. Late, high obviously he is lucky that Langdon got up.
- Feb 26, 2014
- 20,878
- 11,411
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd, Liverpool, Cavaliers
The ball was gone and then he jumped, elbow out, and got him in the face. He didn't need to do that. It wouldn't have been as bad if it wasn't so late but it was.
I'm almost convinced the MRP are deliberately trolling the football going public. How did Wines get off that? He collected him in the head, no attempt to tackle, it's all too insane for freaking words. Redpath cops 2 for a love tap! There is major corruption happening here, i can't believe it's just total incompetence. The Greene decision is a "green" light to stick the boots up any time you want, the precedent has been set. They are absolutely out of control at the MRP.
- Jun 28, 2013
- 2,346
- 2,572
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Geelong Geelong Geelong
Read the Port fans explanations they're as clear as mud.
No idea. It's bizzare. Jumped, late, didn't choose to tackle, head contact?
I'm completely bewildered at this decision...
