Stop the boats. 5k a head. (cont. in Part 2)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sarah/ Gough greencreep triumphalist relish at encouraging suicide attempts plumbs the depths yet again.
But what can be expected from those indifferent to http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/11/18/3891003.htm?

Crying over people in detention while turning a blind eye to those that drowned whats new? Remember Rudd voted himself in NOBODY voted for him remember. And when Rudd announced the new 'compassionate' way for dealing with asylum seekers this board was strongly against it.

If we don't count the thousand who drowned off our coasts, the reopening of the offshore detention centers, the billions wasted and the thousands in detention then the compassionate way was a tremendous success.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sarah/Gough greencreepery would have children still in detention on Christmas Island as well as being regularly drowned in Java Sea.
Greencreepery appears to require child sacrifice in service of ideology.
 
Last edited:
Country shopping = choosing your country of asylum. Genuine refugees don't have this right. Your parents didn't, they had to rely on Australia inviting them.

first-fleet-cartoon.jpg
 
Nonense. Australia was warned re Tamils getting on boats. Just as the UK has long had an issue with respect to asylum seekers and terrorism. One example below of many. How do you think the name Londonistan came about?
Racist nutters made it up?
 
Of course you would Maggie. But if you were country shopping then you wouldn't be a genuine refugee genuinely fleeing your homeland in fear of your life would you?
Yes, they stroll through a department store and casually select a country.

These are just words and phrases made up by pissy little racists to demonise those in need.

It's like you think they look around and decide that they are sick of waiting for sourdough bread and Perrier to become readily available so they pack up their things in the family SUV and choof off to a neighbourhood more befitting their station in life.
 
The 53000 who handed over up to 12500K to people smugglers between 2008 and 2013 - why did they all come here and not go somewhere else?
 
[QUOTE="Chief, post: 36856758, member: 5766"]Yes, they stroll through a department store and casually select a country.

These are just words and phrases made up by pissy little racists to demonise those in need.


It's like you think they look around and decide that they are sick of waiting for sourdough bread and Perrier to become readily available so they pack up their things in the family SUV and choof off to a neighbourhood more befitting their station in life. [/QUOTE]

Nope. They just contact people smuggler from international criminal syndicate who is offering Australian citizenship at the end of the journey and they pay up to 12-15000K for syndicate to get them to Christmas Island.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You seriously are becoming repetitive and boring.
Shame nothing is happening as you need new material.

Must be annoying having reminders of your support for policies that would have children dying at sea interrupting your complaints about the inhumanity of them being held in detention.
 
Getting desperate now, this is just government spin.
Only on here is 'country shopping' used so frequently - means nothing.
It is amazing how first-hand experience is being ignored in deference to what some people read or are being told by those with a vested interests.
 
Must be annoying having reminders of your support for policies that would have children dying at sea interrupting your complaints about the inhumanity of them being held in detention.
Nothing new to add? Said before, time for you to move on and find something new.
 
And again: http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/11/18/3891003.htm?

No more vivid example of how the criminal people smuggling syndicates lure potential economic migrants with promises of Australian citizenship. ie country shopping.

Take no responsibility and pretend it didn't happen.

White washing of history.

That way when it happens again they can act all shocked.

Its hard to claim the moral high ground when you support policies that cause mass murder. Does not stop them trying though.

Remember Rudd voted himself in nobody one this board voted for him and certainly were not cheering when he changed the immigration system to be more 'compassionate.'
 
Take no responsibility and pretend it didn't happen.

White washing of history.

That way when it happens again they can act all shocked.

Its hard to claim the moral high ground when you support policies that cause mass murder. Does not stop them trying though.

Maggie's family was one of the beneficiaries of the dawn of the post war Australian immigration program - crafted and overseen by the Chifley Labor govt and in particular Immigration minister Arthur Calwell.
It changed the face and destiny of Australia and is the foundation of the multicultural society we have today.

So riddle me this - how come this poster who owes everything to Australia throwing open its doors to WW2 refugees in an orderly program - want to see our immigration and humanitarian program contracted out to criminal people smuggler syndicates? Why would she want to see people like her family denied refuge in Australia - as thousands were by Rudd and Gillard - because their places were all hijacked by cashed up people smuggler clients.

And why on earth would she want to see the people smuggler customers continue to put their children at risk of drowning at sea? The justifications are so painful.
 
2 wrongs don't make a right.
Locking people in detention centres until they literally go mad isn't the right answer.
Ask yourself if you would like this to happen to your children or someone in your family.
Claiming that this is compassionate because the alternative is worse doesn't make sense.
It just means both solutions are wrong.
Anything that diminishes our common humanity and compassion is wrong & selfish.
Making yourself feel less selfish by pointing your finger at others doesn't work either.
There has to be a better way.
Political leaders should make us want to aim higher, not race to the gutter and then try and pat us on the back because we are all being selfish together.

I know I'm being idealistic and there isn't an easy answer but we can do a lot better than what is going on now.
 
Maggie's family was one of the beneficiaries of the dawn of the post war Australian immigration program - crafted and overseen by the Chifley Labor govt and in particular Immigration minister Arthur Calwell.
It changed the face and destiny of Australia and is the foundation of the multicultural society we have today.

So riddle me this - how come this poster who owes everything to Australia throwing open its doors to WW2 refugees in an orderly program - want to see our immigration and humanitarian program contracted out to criminal people smuggler syndicates? Why would she want to see people like her family denied refuge in Australia - as thousands were by Rudd and Gillard - because their places were all hijacked by cashed up people smuggler clients.

And why on earth would she want to see the people smuggler customers continue to put their children at risk of drowning at sea? The justifications are so painful.
Almost brought me to tears.
I just thank god I never ran into someone like you when going to school, it was bad enough.:mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top