- Nov 5, 2009
- 10,085
- 9,299
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I get that you can be upset about things in football and be unhappy with decisions. But if you're gonna get upset at s**t like this, you're gonna have a bad time!
Is that you Thumper?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get that you can be upset about things in football and be unhappy with decisions. But if you're gonna get upset at s**t like this, you're gonna have a bad time!
Hendo's form has been good, it's a big loss given how small our defense will be now, and how little drive we will have out of there. No Jaensch, Smith or Hendo, I'm worried.Commentators on 5aa saying no Hendo is a huge blow.
I don't mind it, Kerridge is a very good in, Hendo's form has hardly been strong...with the right moves it could be beneficiary.
Good.It's the principal - don't make the comment if you don't want to stick to it.
Now he'w made Lyons the sub two weeks in a row, the justification to chamge his stance on particular issues will become easier and easier.
That's not all he said though, what he was really making a point on was not liking the idea of a guy not getting a full game two weeks in a row.It's the principal - don't make the comment if you don't want to stick to it.
Now he'w made Lyons the sub two weeks in a row, the justification to chamge his stance on particular issues will become easier and easier.
Did walsh actually ever say that he wouldn't make a player sub two weeks in a row? (I never directly heard him say this) Or did people just assume that was his policy after dropping lyons and grigg after decent games as sub?
No Hendo mean Mackay for kickin duties?
Yes, put Danger on HB pls, should get plenty of ball then.
Good.
That's not all he said though, what he was really making a point on was not liking the idea of a guy not getting a full game two weeks in a row.
It's the principal - don't make the comment if you don't want to stick to it.
Now he'w made Lyons the sub two weeks in a row, the justification to chamge his stance on particular issues will become easier and easier.
Last thing we need is a coach who doesn't do something because he once in a post-game interview he sort of said he wouldn't do it.good what??
Luke Brown to have a breakout game and show the run and carry out of D50 that he showed as a junior.
Luke Brown to have a breakout game and show the run and carry out of D50 that he showed as a junior.
Hopefully GWS kick straightWho takes the kick-outs?
Dmack and VB should be the ones, or try Grigg. His leg off half back would be worth trying. Pace is the issue thoughHendo is a big loss with Jaensch and Smith already missing, who the hell will be kicking out from the back half?
Have to agree. I realise that there's been extenuating circumstances (Lyons came on early last week, there's a late change this week and there's no SANFL games) but it does kinda make you question why he said it in the first place. Oh well, not a huge deal.
Like when Sando said Matt Crouch was going to be sub even before we were eliminated from final 8 contention, so the decision had been made.......Last thing we need is a coach who doesn't do something because he once in a post-game interview he sort of said he wouldn't do it.
We need a coach who does what he thinks is best for the team each week, regardless of "principles"
Geez, if football. Principles? Please. The principle is win the fricken game. If you think Lyons shouldn't be sub, then argue that, not argue, oh no, Walsh has gone back on his word (if you ignore Lyons played 3 quarters)
We don't need a dumb coach.