I'm not privvy to what happened but I'm presuming it was based on something that was made apparent to Goodes.Copping it from 40m away?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not privvy to what happened but I'm presuming it was based on something that was made apparent to Goodes.Copping it from 40m away?
Which is pretty much what a lot of people are saying about Goodes.In the way that says, 'get stuffed'.
Reckon you are giving Goodes way too much credit.
Which is pretty much what a lot of people are saying about Goodes.
Grass isn't greener on the other side of the fence - its the same shade of brown.
You're absolutely right.I reckon people don't even know why they dislike him and they keep looking for reasons to do so but if they really asked themselves why they do, they won't have much to hold up.
Yeah, it's pretty easy to get sucked into the hate spiral.You're absolutely right.
But I do.
Its weird the hate for Goodes. I never particularly liked or disliked him. My mum thought he was hot thats about it. I dont remember people really hating until the Australian of the year thing and 13yroldgirlgate. Are they the main reasons or is there something deeper.
That's the question, isn't it.I don't either. I agree it's really stemmed from the 13 year old girl thing. I wonder if people would still hate him if it was a 40 year old man instead of a 13 year old girl? Perhaps the general public don't like how he targeted a young girl. I don't think he realised she was so young until after he pointed it out.
I'm sure the authorities in SA made sure they got the signatures from the parents when they took the kids away too.Why is Goodes not allowed to point out some little s**t racially abusing him.
Well the royal commission report says otherwise. Should be required reading for all Australians.She came from South Australia, which the state’s Supreme Court found in 2007 never had a policy of removing children simply because they were Aboriginal. In SA children had to be signed away by their parents, not the definition of 'stolen'
Why is Goodes not allowed to point out some little s**t racially abusing him.
Doesnt mean he has to put up with it.The same reason minors aren't named in most legal matters. Publicly humiliating a minor in front of the country is a harsh punishment and is likely to do more harm than good to them. There's also a question about whether a minor would know the racial implications of that particular insult
He's no worse than Sonny has been for the past few years, or even when Pav went through that spell of a few years feigning for free kicks.But at the same time when my memories of Goodes the footballer are of him throwing his arms out and then grabbing his cheek to plead his case for a free, even back to 07ish.
By all means he can celebrate his culture, but the way he targeted the Carlton fans was not the right way to go about it.
He's no worse than Sonny has been for the past few years, or even when Pav went through that spell of a few years feigning for free kicks.
Plenty of other players have reported inappropriate crowd behaviour without doing it so publiclyDoesnt mean he has to put up with it.
It is hard. All this stuff is hard because unless you're aware of it, the emotional feeling of something is often more persuasive than the actual facts of the matter. People keep feeding the emotions and it colours their perceptions. Separating myth from reality just gets harder then.Yeah, for sure.
But equally I can disapprove of their actions in the same way I am sure many Eagles fans disapprove of Cox's in his last couple of years. Feeds into the point that it is so difficult to separate the man from the footballer I guess.