- Oct 25, 2007
- 2,722
- 67
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Thunder
- Thread starter
- #51
Nah... that's a headline comment.OKC are one of the worst coached teams in the league.
Brooks gets blamed for the play calling down the stretch, which may be warranted but there are only like 5 coaches in the entire league who do that well (Pop, Doc, Adelman, who else?). He's a young coach so I'm willing to give him time here.
But look at the facts here:
- Demanded a defensive identity for the team. I know they slid a little last year, but early defensive numbers indicate they are on the improve again in '12.
- Instrumental in the development of Westbrook and Maynor. Being a former PG, he understands these two roles (starting and backup PG) more than anyone.
- The overall development of the squad. Role players like Collison, Sefolosha, Ibaka and Maynor have flourished under Brooks. Their roles are defined and they stick within their boundaries. That's what good coaches do.
All possibly true, but still very subjective.He runs a team of Maynor, Cook, Collison etc and they put up historic levels of efficiency. He might only be behind Nash and Rubio at running the pick and roll. He has insane points per shot on every type of shot he attempts, he also has the best shot selection in the league.
I think you're completely overlooking the qualitative and circumstantial differences between playing 1st and 2nd units. Westbrook's role as primary ball handler and scoring option is much more difficult to Harden's role as a 6th man.