Vdubs
Hall of Famer
One of those seasons where either result would not surprise; can't recall a previous season where bottom 4 was as believable as top 4Cover all bases!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of those seasons where either result would not surprise; can't recall a previous season where bottom 4 was as believable as top 4Cover all bases!
In fairness this is an entirely new and unrelated injury.The worry stems from the fact that despite missing a significant number of games last year and undergoing extensive rehabilitation, he couldn't endure even a minute in this week's game. Understandably, this situation does little to instil confidence.
I think Geelong will need more midfield support however:.
- Bruhn looked sharp and I think can be that bull.
- Bowes will add class. Very tidy player with great disposal
- Mannagh will by top 22 from the first game
- Wiltshire will surprise many this year and has great run and carry
Iff Danger and Cameron stay fit the top 8 is a certainty.
.
No no, not nearly negative enough.
Haven't you heard that Patrick Dangerfield is old?
To their credit there are some in the media with their heads screwed on
Thanks I willYou can pretend it doesn't matter,
Thanks I will
Yeah look I'm just reasonably confident that reversion to the mean on our injuries alone is enough to make us better than last year. Top 8? Definitely possible. Top 4? Probably a bridge too far.Fair enough. Didn't matter last year I guess.
I view us as starting very much as 2022. How we evolve from here is very much a function of the progress of and the evolution of Holmes, Clark, Dempsey, Neale and others.Not pessimistic about us this year, but don't pretend we are that similar to 22. Top 4 to bottom 4 is a definite reality.
Top 4 and Party would go on another long hiatus I'd say. Bottom 4 and the crowing will be loud and clear.Yeah look I'm just reasonably confident that reversion to the mean on our injuries alone is enough to make us better than last year. Top 8? Definitely possible. Top 4? Probably a bridge too far.
This article seems to suggest only missing first couple of roundsOn the brightside, at least we know it's bad. The worst ones are what Guthrie had last year.
Supposedly 'managed' and then was never seen again.
While 8-10 weeks is a bitter pill, I'd prefer that over 1-2 weeks that inevitably turns into 10-12.
Who's the core you're talking about though?That's because he is.
It isn't that we have old players, it's the entire core of the team that will be playing seniors every week. They'll be two years older than in 2022.
You can pretend it doesn't matter, and with the home games there's no need to worry about bottom 4, but to me we can't just assume every player who had a down 2023 (and there were a lot of them) is going to magically recapture form. It wasn't all due to injury. Somewhere in the lower eight/just outside seems about right. There are going to be injuries, just depends who gets them.
Our best players in the 22 GF were pretty well Danger, Smith, Selwood, Stengle, Close, Blicavs, Hawkins and Duncan- 2 have gone, 2 are relatively young, and the other 4 are at an average age of over 33. Stewart and JC did have relatively average games for their standard.Who's the core you're talking about though?
Dangerfield was injured for a huge portion of 2022, and average at best in a lot of the games he did play.
Before that 2 month break in the middle of the year, he went 5 weeks without accumulating 20 touches.
He was elite when it mattered most in September, but we finished 3 games clear on top without a huge contribution from him.
Hawkins was elite, but a weird case study as he seems to be getting better as he gets older.
Cameron & Stewart where elite, and should be expected to remain that way, or close to it.
As it stands, you've got a point with Guthrie. Doesn't look like his form when fit will be much different, but staying fit appears to be the hard part.
You don't rate Blicavs, so we'll just leave him out, and then you've got Stengle.
That's the true core of the 2022 premiership team, evidenced by 5 AA.
The rest where/are bit part players these days (Touhy, Duncan, Stanley) or kids/role players/players in their prime (SDK, Zuthrie, Atkins, JHenry, Holmes etc)
******************
The truth is, we don't really have a core anymore, and we didn't in 2022 either.
It's what happens when your list is both really old, and really young at the same time.
We're mainly reliant on stardom from Stewart, Cameron, and one of Guthrie or Dangerfield, and it trickles down from there.
It's a very different setup to what we're used to, particularly for many of the Scott years.
Take 2017 for instance. It's Dangerfield, Selwood, Hawkins, Duncan, Taylor, a young Stewart, and a whole lot of VFL standard footballers padding out our bottom 6-10.
If even a couple of those guys don't fire, you're in big trouble, and we saw that more than enough in finals of that era.
It's why 2022 was so different. It was more system based, and required a couple of elite performers, but mainly an even spread throughout.
We rarely had players getting 30+ possessions, and when forwards did kick big totals, it was usually 3-5 forwards all getting amongst it, rather than solitary Hawkins 4 goals we became so used to.
Yeah look I'm just reasonably confident that reversion to the mean on our injuries alone is enough to make us better than last year. Top 8? Definitely possible. Top 4? Probably a bridge too far.
Top 4 and Party would go on another long hiatus I'd say. Bottom 4 and the crowing will be loud and clear.
Hope so! It was good to have you back last yearOr alternatively, neither.
Harsh on Jimmy. Think he's pretty solid on Footy Classified.Agree totally with you
Before he coached Collingwood - i thought he was an outstanding media critic/commentator - and he had his stint coaching - and he was a Cigarette paper away from a Collingwood Premiership in 2018
And as we all know - and i think it is quite unfair - but your judged on Premierships or nothing
Geel got the Swans in 22 , you know a flag is a flag and you still get heaps of joy from it , but in 89 Geel lost by 6 pts to Haw , their goal to goal line was Langford Mew Tuck Brereton Dunstall - fell only 6pts short of them , but the Cats get no credit at all because they simply lost
When i post i try to be fair , but i still think Buckley is a very good commentator and i would listen to what he said , no sugar coating rubbish
Contrast that to Ling Harley and Bartel , has there been 3 more underwhelming commentators than those 3 , i wouldnt hang on one single word those 3 said as commentators
Agreed, and I think his commentary stint was underrated too.Harsh on Jimmy. Think he's pretty solid on Footy Classified.
Admittedly, I am biased as he was my favourite Cat (aside from Joel) and I have a lot of love for that beautiful man.
Hope so! It was good to have you back last year
I usually like be right! But not this time.I am hearing 8-10 weeks unfortunately
Preseason is what cooked his quad to begin with! Throw him in cold this time!I usually like be right! But not this time.
I hope in that time period they are planning what they did with danger in 2022. No rush back. Take extra weeks to do a mini preseason after he is healed.
We do not want to risk further soft tissues of him coming back too soon. Let’s bring him back fully fit with strength back in all parts of the leg!
Heart warming stuff! You love to see itI don't care how Geelong fare in 2024. My only wish for this year is for Partridge and Mr. Meow to become the bestest of friends.
I like the guy! But I won't force a friendship if it's not reciprocated.I don't care how Geelong fare in 2024. My only wish for this year is for Partridge and Mr. Meow to become the bestest of friends.
Lol, it was a quad mate, and he walked off the field - so I'd be surprised if he's not back by Round 3-6. 3 months is nuts.