- Aug 10, 2005
- 46,545
- 42,486
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
It was noticeable on Thursday night how much we missed Hanley, and some genuine speed.
Yeah Hanley's better than both of them but we desperately need someone else who's quick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Carlton v Melbourne - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Demons at 59% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
It was noticeable on Thursday night how much we missed Hanley, and some genuine speed.
...they went out and spent $700,000-a-year for four years on Dale Thomas.
... that wasnt what Fevola was talking about.Fevola blasts Carlton for its trades (Judd/Kennedy/Thomas).
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/fo...ffield-decisions/story-fndv8f7j-1226889783899
Also involved in expensive trades that don't work out for clubs: Brendan Fevola.
... that wasnt what Fevola was talking about.
Read the article mate.He who seeks equity, must seek it with clean hands.
... that wasnt what Fevola was talking about.
FORMER Carlton ace Brendan Fevola has taken aim at his old club, criticising the decision to recruit Dale Thomas.
“If the Blues didn’t have the money, then fair enough, let him go.
“But they went out and spent $700,000-a-year for four years on Dale Thomas.
“He may take the occasional specky and get his 15 touches but so what?
“He won’t win you a game off his own boot.”
????????
???????
??????
?????
????
???
??
?
??
???
????
?????
??????
???????
????????
*sigh* l understand you are trying to back up your mate, but you are wrong. He was talking about the eddie betts trade. The carlton fc could have kept betts if they had payed him what he wanted. The article was talking about betts wanted more money, which carlton didnt pay, so he left to Adelaide to get the money. He was talking the reasons behind carlton not paying betts.????????
???????
??????
?????
????
???
??
?
??
???
????
?????
??????
???????
????????
*sigh* l understand you are trying to back up your mate, but you are wrong. He was talking about the eddie betts trade.
I give this post a 'Like', not because it is at all clever, but for its accuracy and the amount of work gone into it.????????
???????
??????
?????
????
???
??
?
??
???
????
?????
??????
???????
????????
That has nothing to do with the article.You may recall that our team (The Brisbane Lions) were involved in a trade involving Lachie Henderson and Brendan Fevola.
Now, apply that to the article, rinse and stir.
Soo, criticising deals where too much money is spent (mis-spent)? You should have finished that quote;“But they went out and spent $700,000-a-year for four years on Dale Thomas.”
He wasn’t criticizing Thomas exactly, he was criticizing cfc for the reason they let betts go.
Too much money for not nearly enough return.“He may take the occasional specky and get his 15 touches but so what?
“He won’t win you a game off his own boot.”
It's because they're part of "The Clique". (Click? Cliche?) Group thing.*sigh* l understand you are trying to back up your mate, but you are wrong.
The article was about the eddie betts deal, he did make a remark about Thomas but the articles main point is about eddie betts.Soo, criticising deals where too much money is spent (mis-spent)? You should have finished that quote;
Too much money for not nearly enough return.
I would take Betts over Thomas too, but Fev took a lot of money too (like Thomas) for no return.
He is pretty.Haso is in the white:
We know that the article doesn't have anything to do with Brisbane, but James was drawing parallels between the article content and the fact that Fev himself ended up being a trade blunder himself.That has nothing to do with the article.