I'll start by saying that I like the strategy of rookie listing mature-aged, delisted free agents. Richmond obviously is not Hawthorn, and we need to find our own recruiting strategy. I think recruiting has been going better than it has for 3 decades, but we still haven't won a final in a long time.
Simpkin I'll pay as an example of Hawthorn rookie listing a mature-aged, delisted free agent, but Ceglar was 21 when the Hawks picked him up. I certainly wouldn't call myself mature-aged at 21. Besides, neither were in the premiership 22.
It is interesting to look at what successful clubs do. Hawthorn had 10 out of 22 from their 2014 premiership team that I'd call substantially developed at Hawthorn. Geelong in the recent glory years had a powerful development machine. Sydney, maybe less so, with more success from recycling players.
I think it's time for Richmond to put more emphasis on development, less on hoping for a great year from a recycled player, playing for pride after getting dropped.
But I would take Taylor Hunt.
First off let me say I found this an extremely good post. It is hard not to agree with your argument (mostly because I agreed with the majority of points before hand).
I think the one take away is that there are many ways to skin a cat, Geelong was renowned for developing their own and not necessarily devaluing trade time, but certainly not being as active as most. They have become one of the great teams of the last 10 years on the back of this.
The Swans on the other hand seem to have gone the other way. Their premiership winning teams (so we can leave out Buddy and Tippett) held the likes of Kennedy, McGlynn, Ted Richards, Rhys Shaw, Marty Mattner and Shane Mumford were all non-Sydney originals. You can also go further back and include Jolly, Nick Davis and Jason Ball. But in saying that, they've been able to do that as I believe their core players who are for the most part home-grown, have been very very good.
The Hawks seem to take the best of both worlds. Guys like Gibson, Hale, Spangher, Simpkin, Ceglar have all been picked up from other clubs and have played their best footy at the Hawks. But their development of players (Puopolo, Bruest, Langford etc) has been probably the best in the AFL over the last 5 odd years.
I personally think that Richmond, going through heavily compromised drafts has got to be closer to the Hawks at this stage than the other two examples. I think that Hunt could possible fill the bill.
There have been others (e.g. TigerImposter ) have been continually talking about not continually recruiting 'd-grade' mature talent at the sake of younger players. The argument is an interesting one, and those who make it do make great points. I am perfectly okay with it if, at the end of the day it brings us closer to a premiership. If that means we pick up Hunt, and axe another 'd-grader' next season because Hunt can play a role (tagger, defensive back etc) I will be perfectly okay with that.