- Sep 7, 2008
- 54,029
- 36,945
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Philadelphia Eagles
I know SM isn't a fan but:
I like this. Fills a hole in our side.
I like this. Fills a hole in our side.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they aren't then Tomlinson and Plowman should be more than gettable with our 2nd & 3rd round picksHenderson and Yarran were drafted in the first round. Nobody thinks they're worth a first round anymore.
They're not great players and I'm not against Bell going for a pick but we already have no forwards trading our only above average one would see Liam Jones return to the side!
I would think there would be clauses if he legitimately retires because of mental health issues. It would be ridiculous to expect any employer to be effectively punished because an employee chooses to quit in those circumstances.I know that but why should 1 club be punished for something which they have no idea about (e.g. mental health causing early retirement) and another who knows their could be a ban coming up to a player get away with not paying them
Is Griffiths that much of an upgrade to Casboult? If anything we are short of forward options as is so even if we keep Casboult we still are 1 short up there, if he was to go someone like Griffiths would be our #1 forward and I'm not sure he'd be able to copeJust saw this bit jd and got me thinking (even though the KB rumour is probably BS), do you reckon the Blues might be open for a swap of Yarran for Griffiths?
Griff is probably an upgrade on Jones and can chop out in the ruck - maybe a tandem with Kreuzer? One forward, one playing in the ruck. Similar age and an early(ish) draft pick like Yarran.
Just wondering if that might be a possible option for both clubs.
Seemed to be the expected outcome last week when the Buddy retirement rumours were out in force that the Swans would have to include his contract in the salary capI would think there would be clauses if he legitimately retires because of mental health issues. It would be ridiculous to expect any employer to be effectively punished because an employee chooses to quit in those circumstances.
I guess it comes down to the distinction between injury forcing retirement - which could be reasonably included - and something like this. If it's all included that will have been us doing everything to push it over the line. Saints would have a bit more flexibility with releasing Carlisle I'd presume.Seemed to be the expected outcome last week when the Buddy retirement rumours were out in force that the Swans would have to include his contract in the salary cap
Plowman has been on the outer all season and is talked about as part of our 4-for-2nd round pick. Tomlinson I'm not too sure how we wrap that deal up, perhaps the Yarran or Henderson pick
They've got to shorten their list and neither have played a great deal because they're well stocked in their positions. They also need to build up their picks to bid for academy players they rate very highly so trading out underutilized talent for future players they rate and have access to makes a lot of senseFair enough, i cant see GWS parting with either of them unless the deal is too good to pass up.
Depends how highly they rate these academy kids and what other picks they're able to bring in to help secure them I guess. I think Tomlinson will stay if McCarthy does get his way and heads west, if not I think they'll cash in on Tomlinson to bid for the academy kidsCant see them letting go of Tomlinson easily
Is Griffiths that much of an upgrade to Casboult? If anything we are short of forward options as is so even if we keep Casboult we still are 1 short up there, if he was to go someone like Griffiths would be our #1 forward and I'm not sure he'd be able to cope
When you have as much cap space as us it is worth the gambleI don't think offering a guy with drug suspensions looming a long contract is a good idea regardless of previous mistakes. Mind you the blokes only played 80-odd games and was a spud this season, the $$$ being mentioned is also crazy! Has he really shown that much in his first 60 games to get a $3.5m deal over 5 years?
so now Carlton saying they wont get pick 9 for Hendo?
GONESKI!!Smith and Stanley, very happy with that.
Simpson gone you would think.
Can't be ALL of next years though. Once next years R1 is gone you're not allowed to trade future rounds. If you trade R2 onwards you can do so with as many as you want but can't then trade your future R1.Looks like you'll be trading all this years and next years picks in one go.
Simpson is a hack anywaySmith and Stanley, very happy with that.
Simpson gone you would think.
Wrong. Just his back is F****D. 2013 before this started to become a serious problem he was developing into a dominant ruckmen. Got injured. Had more surgery and now he struggles to run as a result. You should have seen him in the VFL this year. I felt sorry for him, had the height to be a top ruck but like many before his body has let him down.Simpson is a hack anyway