What! Where?Very surprised at the Luke Delaney delisting.
There's certaintly a few possible options out there for DFA's & the rookie draft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What! Where?Very surprised at the Luke Delaney delisting.
There's certaintly a few possible options out there for DFA's & the rookie draft
Not if we get in before.Injuries have taken a toll with cam, probably get picked up by us again.
If he remains uninjured he'll be better than his brother.Not if we get in before.
I'd definitely be happy for us to take the punt on him. Reunite him with Luke and need another KPD or two!If he remains uninjured he'll be better than his brother.
If it does happen, l expect some sort of deal, probably future good will in a trade or something like that, not sure how it works in that regard.I'd definitely be happy for us to take the punt on him. Reunite him with Luke and need another KPD or two!
What do you mean?If it does happen, l expect some sort of deal, probably future good will in a trade or something like that, not sure how it works in that regard.
We need to stage a Photoshop intervention...
Yea, but there's an unspoken convention that if you delist a player and intend to put him on as a rookie (which we are intending to do) then another club can't pick that said player in the draft. I am not saying you can't, just saying there has always been an unspoken deal between clubs about re-drafting.What do you mean?
you delisted him so he is free for anyone to draft even if you intend of re-drafting him. Todd Banfield as an example last year was contracted for 2014 by Brisbane but they delisted him intending to re-draft as a rookie only for him to be picked up instead by Richmond.
Watching some of the highlights of the guys being named as a possible pick at 21/22 such as Edward Vickers-Willis and Alex Neal-Bullen i find them abit vanilla.
I am sure they will be great players and do the job fine but who are the players that will make me want to give numerous high fives to random other fans in the crowd and cause beer to be accidentally thrown over strangers in celebration.
F#@k North, we owe them no favours; gimme Cam to add to Keys... It'll be the Wakelins Mark II...
See the previous post...Just read Cam Delaney has ongoing left foot (big toe) issues has had two ops and they have delisted him with a year to run on his contract. With the feet issues a number of our players already have our medicos would want to be certain before taking Cam on!
Is exactly what most people said about Fyfe before he was drafted!Jack Watts without elite skills or elite speed is a perfectly fine comparison for Tom Lamb, he's not a top 25 player on production, not close. Defensive skills lacking, doesn't have a set position, doesn't win his own ball in midfield, not strong enough to play key forward.
Nat Fyfe is an elite mark, throws his head over the footy like a mad man and tackles like a machine. Lamb ticks none of those boxes (yet).Is exactly what most people said about Fyfe before he was drafted!
I really want to see us land a key back this draft, particularly if we have plans to play Bruce forward. Our key position depth down back is non existent. I like McDonald but I think it is just a little bit too much of a stretch given the quality that is still likely to be around at pick 21/22. However, I would probably be happy to use that pick on either of Marchbank or Goddard.
I have redone the draft order literally 100 times and I am starting to think there is a actually a pretty good chance that one of Marchbank or Goddard actually does slide, particularly is some or all of the following rumours floated around turn out to be true:
1. Adelaide want McKenzie - This one makes a lot of sense, given that they were willing to downgrade from 10 to 14;
2. Clem Smith is wanted by Gold Coast with pick 15- Would be surprised personally, but happy if this is true. Don't think he is worth a top 20 pick;
3. Carlton are interested in Lamb. Would also be happy with this. I am no draft expert, but the mere comparison from others to Watts without the foot skills has completely spooked me. No thanks.
If the above rumours turn out to be true, there are only 17 picks left, take out Heeney and you have 16. I reckon there are too many other highly fancied players for 4 key backs (Lever, Durdin, Goddard, Marchbank), to be selected with the remaining 16 picks. Therefore I am guessing that Goddard or Marchbank is squeezed out of the top 20. Otherwise one of Duggan, DeGoey, Langford, Cockatoo, Ahern, Weller, Pickett etc. has to slide. It would be great if we could nab one of these guys, but it is less likely.
Under this scenario the following players would still be left: Maynard, Marchbank, Ellis, Garlett, Blakely, Neal-Bulleen, Menadue, Vickers-Willis. I reckon we take Maynard & Marchbank if those options are available.
For our third rounder, I reckon we are a good chance to nab one of: DVR, Touk Miller, McDonald Wigg, Webb, McLean.
Wrapping up, I reckon we could walk away with Petracca, Maynard, Marchbank & McLean. That would be a fricking awesome draft.