you kidding? massive overs. im not even a yarran fan but to give him away for Martin who has so much is risk is not worth it. they can have lucasGarlett + Warnock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

you kidding? massive overs. im not even a yarran fan but to give him away for Martin who has so much is risk is not worth it. they can have lucasGarlett + Warnock?
If they were ruthless - there is a possibility they could delist Carrazzo. If they considerded his wage to be too high and wanted an extra spot on the list and to free up salary cap, Curnow and Cachia perform his role extremely well at a fraction of the costIf Carlton want to build midfield depth then the recruitment of Dale Thomas would bring in pure class with a workrate to match. Granted the ankle passes the medical he would be worth every cent & our midfielders could learn a thing or two off him about a first rate workrate, gut running & effort.
I'd be looking very very closely into Patrick Karnezis who wants to leave Brisbane as well. A mid/forward who would add depth to the midfield & can also push forward to damage on the scoreboard.
Another club to touch base with would be the West Coast Eagles in regards to the state of Andrew Gaff. He is contracted though dependant on what Micks thoughts are on Yarrans tenue at the club, could he possibly enquire into if a trade for Victorian Gaff could happen?
Id also like Carlton to have a chat to Luke Delaney from North Melbourne, is sitting behind Thompson & Grima lacking an opportunity, impressed when ive seen him play a few times. Desperately need a key defender to step in round one next season freeing up Henderson for a move forward. I think Delaney is certainly capable.
On the list management side of things I can envisage about 9 departing the list & possibly more dependant on what happens at the trade table. For now before trade departures are accounted for id have it looking like:
Delistings
Laidler
Davies
Collins
O’Keefe
Dale
Mitchell
McCarthy
Free Agent Departures
Betts
Retirement
Scotland
Thought about this the other day a bit but reckon it would really destroy the fabric of the club and its culture etc.If they were ruthless - there is a possibility they could delist Carrazzo. If they considerded his wage to be too high and wanted an extra spot on the list and to free up salary cap, Curnow and Cachia perform his role extremely well at a fraction of the cost
Thoughts???
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If they were ruthless - there is a possibility they could delist Carrazzo. If they considerded his wage to be too high and wanted an extra spot on the list and to free up salary cap, Curnow and Cachia perform his role extremely well at a fraction of the cost
Thoughts???
For everyone say dusty and daisy will go to hawthorn or collingwood. Please remind urself there is a salary cap and with all their stars they wouldn't be able to pay for either! As for GWS their main priority is Buddy so we might be safe there
Could we fit Martin and Thomas in? Assume around 1.3 a year?
If we lost bets and Scotland - Simpson can go onto vets list juddy took a pay cut.
Is it realistic?
I'm quite certain Waite didn't request to suffer the injuries he has suffered, yet some posters would have you believe he has deliberately injured himself to hurt the club. More importantly some posters want to criticise the club for offering a 3 year deal to a player who stuck fast through the hard times & who, regardless of his unfortunate run with injuries (which really didn't kick in until after he suffered his ACL injury) was one of the most talented/important players on our list.Pretty sure it was a three year deal for Waite, and he's playing good footy at the end of the second year...not the worst outcome.
Warnock and Watson to richmond, martin to GWS patton or pick 1 to us.
you kidding? massive overs. im not even a yarran fan but to give him away for Martin who has so much is risk is not worth it. they can have lucas
Given Garlett has performed better than Yarran in recent times, its still oversI said Garlett not Yarran.

GWS would have to be stupid to take Martin though considering how young their list is.......
Given Garlett has performed better than Yarran in recent times, its still overs![]()
Why is that, he would fit into their age demographic they are trying to build. Same draft as Scully, just A LOT better player and A LOT cheaper.
The GWS's main issue with Martin would be his off-field issues, and if the club's culture would be strong enough to keep him in check.
Why wouldn't Richmond just take #1 for Martin ??? We are not needed in that trade, and would be paying unders ............

