Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

captain cotch 9 will not be seen around here again. Carry on with trade and free agency talk.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I see a pick #1 for pick #3 and player deal. They'd be stupid not to.
Saints would jump at that, GWS would be nuts to do it, especially with Patton going down. Boyd seemed to be the clear no.1 last year, McCartin's no clear no.1 this year, think he's only 192/3cm too, Boyds almost 200cm.Do Saints take a straight swap of Boyd for pick 1?
Is Boyd considered a much better prospect than McCartin?
Jack Watts has played nearly 100 games. He must be worth pick 1 and 2.
Yeah Ok , if you think that see how many offers you will get
Of course I don't think that, I was just using your flawed reasoning as to why you thought Guthrie was worth pick 2 (which is absolutely ridiculous in case you don't realise): comparing his games played to Tyson who had a major knee injury.Yeah Ok , if you think that see how many offers you will get
Yeah Ok , if you think that see how many offers you will get
Again your on the Melbourne board , we undervalue your players and over value ours , it's the same on your board
Just because Guthrie has played 60 games it means nothing to us , watts has player 100 and Tyson had played about 15
If you guys want a look in at pick 2 you have give us something .. You can't put trash on the table an expect us to take it
Of course I don't think that, I was just using your flawed reasoning as to why you thought Guthrie was worth pick 2 (which is absolutely ridiculous in case you don't realise): comparing his games played to Tyson who had a major knee injury.
This guy just doesn't get it lol.
I personally think Jack Watts is worth the top 3 picks, but some say I overrate him. I guess only getting picks 1 and 2 for him wouldn't be the worst deal.Totally agree. You can say what you want. If want to say he is worth picks 1 and 2 good luck to you..
Guthrie is not worth 2 , although I say he is better than Tyson last year , so it just confirms all of us place too much emphasis on potential. To propose that our R16 +Guthrie +.... is the deal? Look your board you can say what you want , if you can get Jacsch and JOK with it good luck to you
I personally think Jack Watts is worth the top 3 picks, but some say I overrate him. I guess only getting picks 1 and 2 for him wouldn't be the worst deal.
Or we could start some kind of pyramid scheme where Jack is traded from club to club so that everyone gets to enjoy his prowess, and we are constantly rewarded for bestowing our grace upon the competition by allowing it.I tend to think you undervalue our players, actually. Jack Watts has more raw potential in his pinky than Gary Ablett has in his entire family tree. I'd be looking for a package deal where every club trades us their first round pick in exchange for Watts. That way we get fair value for one of the most underrated talents in the game and the other clubs get to focus on developing the talent in the small portion of Watts NickGrant sends them via non-returnable and untraceable postal drop.
Are you implying that it isn't real mate? Poor form if so.Careful, Turbocat will start asking how he can buy shares in said pyramid scheme
I tend to think you undervalue our players, actually. Jack Watts has more raw potential in his pinky than Gary Ablett has in his entire family tree. I'd be looking for a package deal where every club trades us their first round pick in exchange for Watts. That way we get fair value for one of the most underrated talents in the game and the other clubs get to focus on developing the talent in the small portion of Watts NickGrant sends them via non-returnable and untraceable postal drop.