- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Posts
- 16,598
- Reaction score
- 11,340
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Why so? Some all time greats in there who would know a thing or two about good footballers.
So you rate the opinions of Jakovich, Bartlett, McLachlan and Darcy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Why so? Some all time greats in there who would know a thing or two about good footballers.
Fyfe is pretty much a walk-up start as an on-baller in everyone's team. Ablett has basically smashed him in every relevant stat, besides marks.
Unless your name is Brandon Ellis, it seems you need two good years to get in for the first time. For example, Libba had a better year last year but gets in this year.sidebottom stiff? had a great year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Had we beaten Carlton in round 6, we'd be playing finals. Did Carlton end our season? No. Not sure why you're suggesting it was Rance that ended it either considering it was a terrible night for forwards and Martin was probably BOG.No, had you beaten Richmond, you would be playing finals. But you lost, at home, and have since then been sulking about and being bitter.
I'd say he is very likely for the final team. Again, care to wager?
Rance won't make the team.
Out of interest is there anyone else who doesn't have significantly worse stats than Ablett or just Fyfe?
A coach pumps up one of his own? Never heard of that happening before.Practically everyone acknowledges Rance's form in the past two months has been stellar. But even before that, back in June, Hardwick suggested he was the best one-on-one player in the competition.
A month ago I'd have said he won't make it due to missing five games, but I think you're going to be disappointed.
A coach pumps up one of his own? Never heard of that happening before.
Two months of "stella" form doesn't put him ahead of Mackenzie, Talia or Hooker - they've been the best performed key defenders all season.
Well the AA team is supposedly on picking form footballers. Bartlett is one of the games greatest, Jakovich and Darcy were great players. They might not be the wisest on every issue but youd think on their footballing standing alone theyd be able to spot a good player?So you rate the opinions of Jakovich, Bartlett, McLachlan and Darcy.
FB: Mackenzie Talia Malceski
HB: Smith Hooker Lewis
C: Beams Pendlebury Heppell
HF: Gray Frankin Harvey
FF: Breust Hawkins Schulz
Foll: Jacobs Selwood Fyfe
Bench: Kennedy Gunston Roughead
Sub: Ablett
Ah its so hard but that's what I'm going with. Midfield impossible to pick.....which is why Lewis is off a half back flank.
I'm sure people will smash me for it...probably missed someone obvious

Question re Ablett.
Lets say for arguments sake that Jarred Waite had kicked 50 goals after 15 rounds and was leading the Coleman by 5-10 at that point.
Would you name him as an All Australian KPF right now ?
Question re Ablett.
Lets say for arguments sake that Jarred Waite had kicked 50 goals after 15 rounds and was leading the Coleman by 5-10 at that point.
Would you name him as an All Australian KPF right now ?
Question re Ablett.
Lets say for arguments sake that Jarred Waite had kicked 50 goals after 15 rounds and was leading the Coleman by 5-10 at that point.
Would you name him as an All Australian KPF right now ?
Because Michael Long isn't on it to give an Essendon player a token award?Looking at the selection panel it's hard to understand how anyone places significant waiting on AA.
Pretty hard to go past these 3 I'd imagine.Any thoughts on the 100% locks for the team?
I personally only have Fyfe, Franklin and Gray as indisputable. The others I think you could reasonably make a case for their rivals, although those arguments would be fairly weak.
Hard argument. I'd say no, Abletts a different kettle of fish though, I would still have Ablett in the team, but on the bench, even as the sub if they pick one.Question re Ablett.
Lets say for arguments sake that Jarred Waite had kicked 50 goals after 15 rounds and was leading the Coleman by 5-10 at that point.
Would you name him as an All Australian KPF right now ?
I'd say Boomer is pretty much a lock on the half forward line. Unless you're talking about players the selectors have locked in.Any thoughts on the 100% locks for the team?
I personally only have Fyfe, Franklin and Gray as indisputable. The others I think you could reasonably make a case for their rivals, although those arguments would be fairly weak.
I'd say Boomer is pretty much a lock on the half forward line. Unless you're talking about players the selectors have locked in.
Any thoughts on the 100% locks for the team?
I personally only have Fyfe, Franklin and Gray as indisputable. The others I think you could reasonably make a case for their rivals, although those arguments would be fairly weak.
Just on Nath Jones, it's going to look idiotic if he finishes top 10 in the Brownlow (which, given his first half, is pretty possible) and didn't make the 40.
For the record, I think he's had a better year than Libba, Selwood, Priddis and Ellis.