Mega Thread 2014 Free Agency and Trade discussion

[youngbear]

I don't know why we would want Dangerfield. If you read other boards then you'll see that pick 2/3 = 2-3 spuds with 2nd or 3rd rounders thrown in.
Why would we want one good player when we could have spuds galore for years to come.

 

[CWaffles]

I don't think they'll be chasing Dangerfield though. They seem to be where we were 5 or 6 years ago betting the house on draft picks. Collingwood could trump us if they get pick 4 for Beams which they forward to Adelaide with pick 8. If we want Dangerfield, we're going to have to pay for him (assuming he even has a skerrick of interest in us).

They will use pick 8 on Moore.

 

[Captain Jack]

They will use pick 8 on Moore.

Chicken dinner. Cop it Collingwood! Obviously Moore will be a good player but that does hamstring them a fair bit regarding trades.

 

[Klyntonius]

They will use pick 8 on Moore.

Of course. Just joined the long queue of Forgetful Joneses who keep missing this!

 

[Demon 16]

I have reason to be very confident danger will remain a crow past next year so I don't take your opinion very seriously at all.

You are kidding your self if you think we will take pick 3 alone for danger... When we could get much better offeres from other clubs which is pointless because as I said I have reason to be very confident danger will remain a crow.

If he wants to come to Victoria, and we offer him more cash than anyone else - then you may want to deal with is this year, rather than next..

Get it?

 

[Dez!]

I have reason to be very confident danger will remain a crow past next year so I don't take your opinion very seriously at all.

You are kidding your self if you think we will take pick 3 alone for danger... When we could get much better offeres from other clubs which is pointless because as I said I have reason to be very confident danger will remain a crow.

Such as?

 

[ThePuppetMaster]

Such as?

I hear Geelong are offering Selwood and Hawkins.

 

[d33my]

I hear Geelong are offering Selwood and Hawkins.

Yes but what will the sweetener be?

 

[Dez!]

I hear Geelong are offering Selwood and Hawkins.

Why would they do that when they hold all the cards?

 

[ThePuppetMaster]

Yes but what will the sweetener be?

Chris Scott?

 

[Bluelegs]

(This is not a troll)

Are people here serious when they say pick 3 and 20 is enough for danger and Lyons

Over the last 3 years Danger has polled 66 Brownlow votes

Over the last 3 years the entire Melbourne team has polled 82 votes

Going by that formula he is worth about 79 percent of your list so we would want a lot more than pick 3 and 20 for danger and Lyons.

This post. I don't even know where to begin.

 

[youngbear]

This post. I don't even know where to begin.

The start. He tried to throw us off the trail by saying he wasn't a troll.... Very clever trick by a troll if you ask me.

 

[MAXIMUM GRUNDAGE]

Dangerfield looks better in red and blue.

 

[Cannon82]

Dangerfield looks better in red and blue.

My first, second and third thoughts were Brent Moloney.

 

[MAXIMUM GRUNDAGE]

Yes but what will the sweetener be?

He won't get tackled by Trenners ever again.

 

[cougar000]

That picture looks more like this man lol
Dangerfield looks better in red and blue. [/QUOTE]

 

[Pecker]

My first, second and third thoughts were Brent Moloney.

No way! Thats Dom Tyson. Check out the hair!

 

[CM Sean]

Don't insult, Tyson. That lego thing's ugly as ****. lol

 

[mrmonkey]

He does have 'The Hair' though.

 

[Dez!]

Interested in George Burbury, Jordan Schroder and Jesse Stringer with the Cats saying they won't be getting new contracts, very interested in Stringer in particular for mine.

 

[Cannon82]

Interested in George Burbury, Jordan Schroder and Jesse Stringer with the Cats saying they won't be getting new contracts, very interested in Stringer in particular for mine.

At the risk of sounding like Mark Neeld, I think we should offer all Geelong rejects a mandatory 3 year contract. Risk free list management. #culture

 

[Dez!]

At the risk of sounding like Mark Neeld, I think we should offer all Geelong rejects a mandatory 3 year contract. Risk free list management. #culture

Except these guys are young and managed to break into the Geelong side at one stage or another and not potatoes.

 

[Cannon82]

Except these guys are young and managed to break into the Geelong side at one stage or another and not potatoes.

Nah, I don't mind the idea. It's highly unlikely they could do worse and/or less than Nicho, Evans, Blease, etc etc so I'd throw a rookie line at a few of them. Burbury hasn't been sighted for about 3 years so I'd probably just give Schroder and Stringer a crack.

 

[Headless]

I like Burbury.

 

[Devastating Boris]

Burbury is a gun just injury prone.