Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Sympathy for *essendon - congratulations on '16 Wooden Spoon (RIP The Scales)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahern2Boof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm officially over laughing at * I want the campaigners out of the comp for 2 years starting now.
Dude? They're the gift that just keeps giving.

I get a daily laugh at how gullible so many of them are. They're like fundamentalist Christians to me.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Tinfoil hat firmly affixed, chuck me down for Dianna was assassinated, 9/11 was an inside job, doubts about Port Arthur and intellegent life exists beyong earth, and you've nailed me to a "tee".

Can't speak on behalf of the rest of 'em though. You could probably PM them.

I actually agree with that one to an extent.

NB: "Diana", "intelligent", "beyond"
 
From today's Age. An article about Dank by Roy Masters

Naming the clubs, Dank added: "There had been underground talk about another club in the `90s where even today, during TV football shows, you will hear ex-players say going up against them was like boys playing on men. Once one club went to the edge, others followed.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...vestigated-20140930-10o58w.html#ixzz3EqXOYPJX

You have to feel for *dank don't you. "Why *me. why *me, everyone else was doing it?" Well yeah perhaps they were but perhaps they were not using WADA banned substances. There is a difference you know *danksy.

The club from the 1990's was surely West Coast.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ng-federal-court-verdict-20141001-10op2e.html

Essendon's barrister in the case, Neil Young, QC, has provided an opinion that the club would win an appeal, based on the view that Justice Middleton's judgement was flawed and did not address the issues raised by Essendon and Hird. Hird's counsel, Peter Hanks, QC, is understood to have shared this view.

LOL, pretty sure you can't just appeal cos you don't agree with the outcome.
 
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ng-federal-court-verdict-20141001-10op2e.html

Essendon's barrister in the case, Neil Young, QC, has provided an opinion that the club would win an appeal, based on the view that Justice Middleton's judgement was flawed and did not address the issues raised by Essendon and Hird. Hird's counsel, Peter Hanks, QC, is understood to have shared this view.

LOL, pretty sure you can't just appeal cos you don't agree with the outcome.

Shhh, let him appeal; it will provide us more entertainment.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The Counsels feel that there is grounds for an appeal? How altruistic of them. Nothing to do with potential invoices, I'm sure. Nothing but a sound, legal basis here.
 
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ng-federal-court-verdict-20141001-10op2e.html

Essendon's barrister in the case, Neil Young, QC, has provided an opinion that the club would win an appeal, based on the view that Justice Middleton's judgement was flawed and did not address the issues raised by Essendon and Hird. Hird's counsel, Peter Hanks, QC, is understood to have shared this view.

LOL, pretty sure you can't just appeal cos you don't agree with the outcome.
More spin than this:

warnemagic.gif


HS reporting *Hird is going to appeal on his own!!! Must stand down if he is going to do this.
Oh please do *james. Show us all just how ****ing stupid and gullible you really are.
 
Last edited:
More spin than this:

warnemagic.gif



Oh please do *james. Show us all just how ******* stupid and gullible you rally are.
Bowling warnie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom