True North
Norm Smith Medallist
I'm officially over laughing at * I want the campaigners out of the comp for 2 years starting now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Without going to the * board to look I'm guessing it's JayDonYou have to tell me who.....
Without going to the * board to look I'm guessing it's JayDon
I've gone with nine because is rhymes with *rines
Dude? They're the gift that just keeps giving.I'm officially over laughing at * I want the campaigners out of the comp for 2 years starting now.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
“@wada_ama: WADA publishes 2015 Prohibited List: http://ow.ly/C57Ac”
Has someone emailed *?
Tinfoil hat firmly affixed, chuck me down for Dianna was assassinated, 9/11 was an inside job, doubts about Port Arthur and intellegent life exists beyong earth, and you've nailed me to a "tee".
Can't speak on behalf of the rest of 'em though. You could probably PM them.
Not my finest work, granted. Skinful of frothies. ApologiesI actually agree with that one to an extent.
NB: "Diana", "intelligent", "beyond"

Not my finest work, granted. Skinful of frothies. Apologies![]()
Yep, but *jimmah could still appeal.So if they opt out it means reissue of Show Cause notices.
Financed by * and another paid* holiday.Yep, but *jimmah could still appeal.
Yep, but *jimmah could still appeal.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ng-federal-court-verdict-20141001-10op2e.html
Essendon's barrister in the case, Neil Young, QC, has provided an opinion that the club would win an appeal, based on the view that Justice Middleton's judgement was flawed and did not address the issues raised by Essendon and Hird. Hird's counsel, Peter Hanks, QC, is understood to have shared this view.
LOL, pretty sure you can't just appeal cos you don't agree with the outcome.
More spin than this:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ng-federal-court-verdict-20141001-10op2e.html
Essendon's barrister in the case, Neil Young, QC, has provided an opinion that the club would win an appeal, based on the view that Justice Middleton's judgement was flawed and did not address the issues raised by Essendon and Hird. Hird's counsel, Peter Hanks, QC, is understood to have shared this view.
LOL, pretty sure you can't just appeal cos you don't agree with the outcome.
Oh please do *james. Show us all just how ****ing stupid and gullible you really are.HS reporting *Hird is going to appeal on his own!!! Must stand down if he is going to do this.
Bowling warnie.More spin than this:
![]()
Oh please do *james. Show us all just how ******* stupid and gullible you rally are.
EFABowling Shane.
