Sidebottom to sign for 5 years and 2.75mill

[Scodog10]

Yeah but you started out question Sidey's character as per the five year deal. If you know Sidey to be a good bloke, than why care? Three years for a gun like Sidey, no chance. As has been mentioned, three year deals for a player the quality of Steele are in the past.

This is like reading a TradeDraft post where he just misinterprets everything and then implies you meant the complete extreme of your view. Bizarre really.

 

[Pie eyed]

I wonder what he was offered from other clubs

Cartoon offered a Million a year for 7...but Sidey said he couldn't hang with Daisy.....

 

[PieBeast]

Sidey's no angel off the field albeit much tamer nowadays but he's also our second best player and is very durable.

We should be over the moon we got him so cheap and for that long.

 

[Apex36]

This is like reading a TradeDraft post where he just misinterprets everything and asks why you've taken the opposite view. Bizarre really.

So what You're saying is that Steele should be sent to prison and Sexually abused for Taking coke and being a top Bloke?

 

[Scodog10]

So what You're saying is that Steele should be sent to prison and Sexually abused for Taking coke and being a top Bloke?

That's precisely what I'm saying! I'll add though that if the sentence is 5 years I'm going in hard for it to be reduced to 3

 

[jackcass]

Good deal for all concerned I think, we get a quality player for under what he'd likely attract under FA, he gets the security.

No doubt it'll make the clubs longer term list management just a tad easier as well.

 

[Obese Arachnid]

I wonder what he was offered from other clubs

Apparently from what I'm reading on this thread it would be in the vicinity of.............................

 

[TheSierBear]

This is like reading a TradeDraft post where he just misinterprets everything and then implies you meant the complete extreme of your view. Bizarre really.

I found this comment very rude, and you're completely wrong.

You compare Sidey to Martin and Swan.
You then say, you feel teeniest bit uncomfortable because he 'likes to party'.

Then what I've done is I've argued that,

Sidey shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as Martin and Swan.
Long term contracts are the thing of the present and future.

Have I got what you meant? If I misunderstood you, then kindly go back to your original comparison to Dusty and Swan and tell me what you were alluding to? Sorry for taking you the wrong way.

Can anyone else decipher what he was alluding to with the comparisons and whining about the five year deal?

 

[TheSierBear]

So what You're saying is that Steele should be sent to prison and Sexually abused for Taking coke and being a top Bloke?

More like,
Steel is Like Dusty and Swan so Should be Offered a 3 Year Deal.

OK, do you know Steel personally?

No you Took me out of Context and misinterpreted me I hear that Steele, Dusty and Swan are Great Blokes socially.

 

[Scodog10]

I found this comment very rude, and you're completely wrong.

You compare Sidey to Martin and Swan.
You then say, you feel teeniest bit uncomfortable because he 'likes to party'.

Then what I've done is I've argued that,

Sidey shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as Martin and Swan.
Long term contracts are the thing of the present and future.

Have I got what you meant? If I misunderstood you, then kindly go back to your original comparison to Dusty and Swan and tell me what you were alluding to? Sorry for taking you the wrong way.

Can anyone else decipher what he was alluding to with the comparisons and whining about the five year deal?

Haha report it then? I repeat bizarre.

 

[TheSierBear]

Haha report it then? I repeat bizarre.

No I won't waste their time.

To summarize, you've categorized Sidey with Swan and Martin, and said that he should be offered 3 years, with Keefe's name thrown in.

If I've misinterpreted you, please point out what I've misinterpreted, what I've taken out of context, and what exactly it is you find 'bizaar', please, help, right now I'm...

 

[Apex36]

More like,
Steel is Like Dusty and Swan so Should be Offered a 3 Year Deal.

OK, do you know Steel personally?

No you Took me out of Context and misinterpreted me I hear that Steele, Dusty and Swan are Great Blokes socially.

Your argument is with Scodog, not me. Throw your shit at someone else buddy.

 

[Scodog10]

Your argument is with Scodog, not me. Throw your shit at someone else buddy.

Ease up I'm not interested in it either!

 

[TheSierBear]

Ease up I'm not interested in it either!

Because you are wrong.

It's starts out with you clearly assassinating Sidey's character.
You compare him to Swan and Martin.
That he likes to party.
You even mention Keeffe.
You say he should have been offered 3 years.

I defend Sidey, then you say.

Swan, Martin and Sidey are great blokes socially.
And that I've misinterpreted you TradeDraft style and said that it's all 'bizaar'...

 

[Copeland]

Apparently from what I'm reading on this thread it would be in the vicinity of.............................

Your a phunny phucker

 

[sirlothie]

Yes. It's understandable. He gives them a very good run for their money.

Bullshit.

 

[sirlothie]

Because you are wrong.

It's starts out with you clearly assassinating Sidey's character.
You compare him to Swan and Martin.
That he likes to party.
You even mention Keeffe.
You say he should have been offered 3 years.

I defend Sidey, then you say.

Swan, Martin and Sidey are great blokes socially.
And that I've misinterpreted you TradeDraft style and said that it's all 'bizaar'...

Don't worry about it, on the one hand he pots Darcy and Sidey who has never been caught putting a foot wrong, then 5 minutes later he tells us we are tarnishing Heath Shaw's reputation. It makes no sense. I don't know who he paid to get this reputation as a 'great poster' because he talks rubbish. I'd almost call it trolling.

 

[Apex36]

Bullshit.

Its been pretty well known for a while that Steele parties with the best of them. Scodog isn't exactly relaying new information.

 

[sirlothie]

Its been pretty well known for a while that Steele parties with the best of them. Scodog isn't exactly relaying new information.

Where does this come from? News to me.

 

[Apex36]

Where does this come from? News to me.

Been hearing bits and pieces for years now. It's really not all that surprising. He was besties with Beams and Shaw while they were at the club (still is afaik), so he was and probably still is, hanging in those circles.

 

[76woodenspooners]

I have always thought Steele has a bit of the Paul McCartneys about him...

I always thought Nat Fyffe had a bit of Ringo Starr about him

 

[sirlothie]

Been hearing bits and pieces for years now. It's really not all that surprising. He was besties with Beams and Shaw while they were at the club (still is afaik), so he was and probably still is, hanging in those circles.

Yeah well 99% of young people like to party but Steele hasn't cocked up yet at least that we know of...

 

[Bring_Back_Brad]

He's getting much more than 2.75m its an insult anyone actually believes that.
It's a 700k p/yr deal min.

 

[nahnah]

He's getting much more than 2.75m its an insult anyone actually believes that.
It's a 700k p/yr deal min.

Weird post, not sure of agenda

 

[jmac70]

Honestly don't think he'd be tempted anyway.

According to Black

I always thought Nat Fyffe had a bit of Ringo Starr about him

Totally!