Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. PFD tackle on Kruzer - MRP grades it as 1 week suspension

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Going to be a interesting one.

- Clearly Dangerfield thought Kreuzer still had the ball as he was appealing for HTB after he tackled him.
- BUT Kreuzer didn't have the ball so the nebulous 'duty of care' is going to be raised.
- BUT there was certainly no 'two' actions that a sling tackle is defined as.
- The tackle pinned Kreuzer's arms and thus he couldn't protect himself which was the main cause of any injury.
- Kreuzer was clearly dazed. Carlton medical report will be interesting.

At a guess he will get a fine....but who knows really until the MRP get the Ouija board out.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #38
Hope its not gone CH7 going hard on showing 123214689 times.

MRP have a history on being soft on brownlow chances so he has a chance of getting off.
but they'll set a precedent this week on blind sided inadvertent tackles with concussive results that have no 2 motions or spearing of the tacklee.

Just watch.

Go Catters
 

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #44
Scott talking about it now.
Flog CH7 stevens talking hard about it.

CS just put Steveo the flog back over his head for 6.

Categorically and clinically, per the AFL reasoning, CS answered the case - and that there is none.

Go Catters
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If c7 execs are watching I'd be pouring cold water on it.

Brownlow medal night will be some fizzer if he's ineligible. How do u suppose Brucey builds up that tension from rd 6 on wards. when the winners know Gil reads the last rd votes at warp speed. He'll be in overdrive from rd 12!!!!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. PFD tackle on Kruzer - MRP grades it as 1 week suspension

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top