roscreasl98
Norm Smith Medallist
- Banned
- #3,726
Yet you don't understand life....Well I understand satire and ellipses, so no.
Sad is an understatement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet you don't understand life....Well I understand satire and ellipses, so no.
I know what the definition is. And they are definitely not. I'm not sure saying that David Warner is a s**t test batsman on anything but flat tracks or Mitchell Starc is an ordinary test bowler is bigoted, racist or insulting to a poster.They are actually. Very much so.
Look up the definition of bigot, read and consume the meaning, then fade away........
Good. Now explain why you are against gay marriage.Because I can.
Another non-sequitur.Yet you don't understand life....
Sad is an understatement.
So you did do exactly what I suggested (pretty clear since I even quoted you), now you're throwing out non-sequiturs
I've posted more opinion than you, you've just randomly attacked people
Good. Now explain why you are against gay marriage.
So the quotes from you, weren't actually you? Or you misspoke?
Don't appreciate your tone mate.Because you just made them up. It is not the specific initials I care about, it is the gist of your post that once SSM is approved the gay-lobby will move on to another topic. I'll ask again, what topic? Spell it out in plain English without deflection or obfuscation.
Serious question: Which religious passages do you follow?I already have.
He hasnt for the past few days with everyone asking i doubt he will now.Good. Now explain why you are against gay marriage.
So you troll me.Another non-sequitur.
Maybe try posting an opinion, last time I remember reading your posts, you were prodded for justification, you cracked the sads then stopped posting.
You've literally ignored all that was posted and said "yeah but you picked on spelling!"
If you want to believe he's genuinely using the death of someone to push anti SSM that's fine, not really sure you look good defending that...
Yep, well that's relevant to the thread.............I know what the definition is. And they are definitely not. I'm not sure saying that David Warner is a s**t test batsman on anything but flat tracks or Mitchell Starc is an ordinary test bowler is bigoted, racist or insulting to a poster.
Matches your relevancy.Yep, well that's relevant to the thread.............
Stop trolling.So the quotes from you, weren't actually you? Or you misspoke?
For all you hard core capitalists, you know how much money gay men in relationships have? You know it, everybody knows they're absolutely loaded. This is the perfect opportunity to relieve some of them of it and churn it back into the economy, do you know how much weddings cost?! And the bonus vow renewal ceremonies?
Could revive the whole industry ...
Your defensiveness demonstrates I hit something right on... take a breath champ, the internet tough guy act is done to death.HAHAHAHA. You idiot. I could not give a sh*t if this guy is genuine, and I didn't never vouched that he was. It isn't of any interest at all to me. But what I did notice is that you questioned whether he was genuine based upon whether he could spell. I simply pointed out that whether he can or cannot spell doesn't determine whether he is genuine or not. What sh*t logic you have applied there. To further show how stupid you are you have then assumed that I believe he is genuine because he is using someones death to push anti-SSM. Where did I say that anywhere? I didn't, you absolutely flog. Big footy, never change, LOL.
Great comeback.Matches your relevancy.
Please learn how to use ellipses correctly.Stop trolling.
Creepy....
Creepy.....
Serious question: Which religious passages do you follow?
Anyway, I've kept to the theme of the thread.Please learn how to use ellipses correctly.
I've pointed out your idiocy, your just throwing out random rants and denying quotes of yourself. I would accuse you of trolling but this is exactly what you did last time...
As I said serious question, I've never understood only following some aspects. The religious people I know have never been able to explain why they're against SSM due to the bible, but don't follow most of the other parts.Not biting.
Wasn't your initial post an attack at everyone who disagrees with you...Anyway, I've kept to the theme of the thread.
You've resorted to personal attacks.....
Good one....
Not biting.