on the disco round yeahhDid he like to boogie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

on the disco round yeahhDid he like to boogie?
He was given one. But he preferred the night life apparently.
He's medium, but he's the type of medium we need. Still don't think he's ever gonna comeback though.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I agree his currency has risen very high, love the bloke tho, always wanted him to succeed with us!
His run and boot sets him apart from all our mediums except Jack Crisp, and Murray to an extend. I think he’d fit nicely in Maynes spot, but like mentioned would cost a lot.
I'm happy to admit trading Seedsman was a mistake. Probably the only one we have made for a long while though. You cant win them all and even the trade itself couldnt be considered a loss given we landed Howe. But yes losing Seedsman was a mistake.
In terms of wanting him back....well no, hes gone, cant see why he'd want to come back, and he'd cost too much. Just need to back Murray and others in, and learn from how we failed to back Seedsman in.
Seedman was one dimensional. That trade was a win for us.
Adams made the Shaw trade look good again today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t think Seedsman would have ever become the player he is now if he stayed in Melbourne. His dickhead mates had too much influence on him.Don’t get me wrong I am happy with the trade because we got Howe. If we could have landed Howe another way then maybe we could still have both of them. But Seedsman in 2018 form would have improved us even further this year.
Adams is one of many deals where we are miles ahead. He’s still only 25 or so!!
You can’t blame it on the boogieBoogie all night long.
I don’t think Seedsman would have ever become the player he is now if he stayed in Melbourne. His dickhead mates had too much influence on him.
We will never know.
Not sure if anyone listened to Bucks on the hot breakfast this morning, but he made a very strongly worded speech about the AFL interfering with player movement when Tom Lynch’s name came up.
Yes and it seemed like he almost slipped up and was going to say Tom wants to go home. Or maybe thats just what I wanted to hearNot sure if anyone listened to Bucks on the hot breakfast this morning, but he made a very strongly worded speech about the AFL interfering with player movement when Tom Lynch’s name came up.
Not sure if anyone listened to Bucks on the hot breakfast this morning, but he made a very strongly worded speech about the AFL interfering with player movement when Tom Lynch’s name came up.
Not sure if anyone listened to Bucks on the hot breakfast this morning, but he made a very strongly worded speech about the AFL interfering with player movement when Tom Lynch’s name came up.
If true I can't wait for the Tiger/Hawk posters on the Lynch thread have an absolute meltdown...going to be gold.Clearly Pies (Ed) have him covered.
Sent from my Warped mind [emoji89]
And that was what Bucks was annoyed about. The idea that the AFL could force a player who wants to move home in to staying put is fairly ludicrous.Roos went pretty hard saying the AFL MUST keep him at the Gold Coast.
He is a gonna IMO.
Nah I heard it that way too. It was a pretty interesting unprompted outburst considering the fairly light hearted lead in. Made me think Bucks may be a tad invested in the young man.Yes and it seemed like he almost slipped up and was going to say Tom wants to go home. Or maybe thats just what I wanted to hear
And that was what Bucks was annoyed about. The idea that the AFL could force a player who wants to move home in to staying put is fairly ludicrous.
Nah I heard it that way too. It was a pretty interesting unprompted outburst considering the fairly light hearted lead in. Made me think Bucks may be a tad invested in the young man.
Well it was almost like...you can't stop my player from coming home...his on my whiteboard for 2019.And that was what Bucks was annoyed about. The idea that the AFL could force a player who wants to move home in to staying put is fairly ludicrous.
Nah I heard it that way too. It was a pretty interesting unprompted outburst considering the fairly light hearted lead in. Made me think Bucks may be a tad invested in the young man.

Can someone please explain to me how equalisation is fair?


