- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Posts
- 11,082
- Reaction score
- 13,856
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
So you'd trade Wallis for a four pick upgrade? Poor unappreciated bastard.
IF he wants to go.
I would prefer to keep him & Libba but let the other FA go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

So you'd trade Wallis for a four pick upgrade? Poor unappreciated bastard.
IF he wants to go.
I would prefer to keep him & Libba but let the other FA go.
Why are we so happy to lose proven experienced players who are only 25 or so for magic beans?
It cant be salary cap, even with the Boyd factor we are choc full of pups on minimum chips.
Doesn't make any sense to me.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah Adelaide knew what the compo was going to be and didn’t think that was enough so they matched and went to trade.Dangerfield was a forced trade, they never went to compo.
I hope he stays. I still think Dahl and Wallis most likely will be Bulldogs next year. Just hyperthical what we can do if that isn't the case.Why are we so happy to lose proven experienced players who are only 25 or so for magic beans?
It cant be salary cap, even with the Boyd factor we are choc full of pups on minimum chips.
Doesn't make any sense to me.
If that trade happened who would you take with pick 2? Bit of talk Blues make take Walsh so Lucousis could be available. If he went 1 though would you take Walsh. Smith could go anywhere between 2 and 6 too by what I'm reading. I would want 38 or 42 coming back our way too.It's not in our interests to do the trade if Band 1. Why take a worse deal?
IF it's band 2 comp worthy, then trade multiple late second / third rounders to give us lots of points.
GC might even trade pick 2 for 6 & Wallis.
Its a good trade, drop 4 spots for a senior player who provides leadership and drive. It's the sort of trade they should have done from Day 1. They can still get the King brothers in the pick 6 range.
I’d rather get gonorrhoea of the eyes and herpes of the tongue than see that orange plastic sh!t win anything.
Couldn’t care if them winning meant us getting Shiel and Kelly the whole lot of them can GAGF.
Eagles and saints keen on Roughead with him likely to leave according to Stevo/Ch7
Eagles and saints keen on Roughead with him likely to leave according to Stevo/Ch7
Straight swap for Billings and the premiership window is open
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp...free-agency-compensation-20180221-p4z16j.htmlBut then wouldn’t we argue Dangerfield is on that amount and he triggered band 1? AFL really should release the formula required to trigger appropriate compo pick.
Couldn't see that occuring. The trade and the window opening on the back of Billings.
They're welcome to him...Surplus with Trengove and English and all the other talls.Eagles and saints keen on Roughead with him likely to leave according to Stevo/Ch7
Ditto, but re: Dahl and Wally - it seems we've low-balled both.Why are we so happy to lose proven experienced players who are only 25 or so for magic beans?
It cant be salary cap, even with the Boyd factor we are choc full of pups on minimum chips.
Doesn't make any sense to me.
So Saints are keen on Roughead, Hannebery and Menzel. Oh boy.
Ditto, but re: Dahl and Wally - it seems we've low-balled both.
Has massive train wreck written all over it. Stinks of a desperate coach trying to cling to a job....


