- Moderator
- #7,637
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Walsh went at 29.5 disposals a game and 4.5 tackles, while Phillips went at 22.1 disposals and 4.0 tackles.
EDIT: Rowell went at 19.5 disposals and 5.5 tackles.
Rowell had 40 or something didn't he in GF?Plenty of draft watchers believe Phillips had more impact during Oakleigh's finals campaign last year than Rowell did.
44 & 2 goals. 32 touches in the prelim, 29 in the qualifying final.Rowell had 40 or something didn't he in GF?
Rowell had 40 or something didn't he in GF?
We should take comfort from the fact that two top ten picks will net us a very, very good player. Here's some stats on draft picks (data from 1993-2018)There have been dud top 10 midfielders too. Nobody is a guarantee.
Yeah, me too. He could be a real value later pick. Small, but can play for sure.I like the look of Jake Bowey tape Giantroo uploaded on Patreon. A couple of turnovers but genrally used the ball well and seemed to get to the outside well.
His Dad was ok for a midget as well.
Right I want the Bulldogs first pick, they aint going to need it.
How we achieve the good people? This is a wonderful opportunity for us.
While a lot of people on this board and im one of them would love to hear Phillips name called out at 2 i just dont see it happening, if we were at pick 4 or 5 i could see it happening just not at 2. Fully expect McDonalds/Hollands name to be called out, McDonald if Brown goes, Hollands if he stays. DGB wont be an option with Corr coming now i believe.
Why do people think the Dogs won't need their first pick?Right I want the Bulldogs first pick, they aint going to need it.
How we achieve the good people? This is a wonderful opportunity for us.
Pittard and Polec?Right I want the Bulldogs first pick, they aint going to need it.
How we achieve the good people? This is a wonderful opportunity for us.
Pittard and Polec?
If we truely want Phillips trading down a spot or two might be a real option.
There have been dud top 10 midfielders too. Nobody is a guarantee.
Imagine if someone traded us a first rounder for Dumont and Macmillan. Bizarro world.That's only useful if you're trying to get North Melbourne's first pick.
As it stands they have pick 11, which is worth 1329 points. *'s R2 is currently 24, worth 785 and our R3 is pick 38, worth 465. So our R2 + R3 are already worth more than their R1. It should be pretty easy to make it worthwhile for them. Of course every other team will realise this too. Not sure what the limitations are on swapping for late picks and whether academy and F/S picks push everyone below's points value down.Why do people think the Dogs won't need their first pick?
If JUH gets a bid in the top 3, I would think they would need it to match.
Otherwise their first rounder could slide way too much next year.
Plus, I thought the rules were changes so clubs just don't load up on later picks?
Don't you need to take in the same amount of draft picks as list spots available?
If we truely want Phillips trading down a spot or two might be a real option.
Pittard and Polec s**t all over Hay, we are improvingThat's only useful if you're trying to get North Melbourne's first pick.