- Nov 23, 2015
- 11,862
- 17,576
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Moderator
- #17
OK, let's leave the hair pulling and biffo on the field, and keep this thread free of trolling comments.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's very interesting. I'm not sure our match committee actually considers things like that - but if they're edging towards selecting him, perhaps it could put him over the edge.Hogan has a good record against the Bulldogs.
If he's fully fit, I wouldn't be surprised if we find a spot for him.
He's 35, his knees and ankles are screwed, he cannot jump at the contest, and he's addicted to eating sausages. He only has so many games in him - 2 weeks in a row will have stretched him, he might not have a 3rd game, especially when the Dogs have the duo that they do.Why wouldn't Mumford play?
He's 35, his knees and ankles are screwed, he cannot jump at the contest, and he's addicted to eating sausages. He only has so many games in him - 2 weeks in a row will have stretched him, he might not have a 3rd game, especially when the Dogs have the duo that they do.
Yes, no doubt he's been very important in those two wins. But better to swap a fresh ruck in than to go a week too long and carry him as a passenger. And I'd be concerned about a tired Mummy going up against a fresh Stef Martin plus Tim English.He’s been pretty important in the 2 wins though, right? Surely he squeezes out one more considering the history between the 2 sides.
One change we need is an end to wasting time and energy on overt displays of the rivalry, such as who tosses the coin, and that sort of thing. It's a distraction we don't need.
Keep the focus strictly on the field and playing contested football. That's the best way to silence them.
That’s a hard no on hogan playing in the backlineAm not sure how the defence can cope with the overhead power of Naughton, Bruce and English.
Perhaps Hogan can help out back there (becoming our own Liam Jones or Darcy Moore) or free up HH to go back.
We’ve got issues if even Buddy could take a couple of overhead marks against our defence.
I’d like both in the same team but not at the expense of a Daniels etcCheck out Phil’s latest podcast at 16 mins 30 sec for his analysis of our ECFL players vs Swans.
He says JH is “far too good” for the ECFL, but he needs “another 1-2 weeks re fitness”.
I see him as being likely vs Crows in R7 to get the in-game team connections working.
Our R9-11 is the toughest stretch of our season, so lets hope he can hit that at full tilt.
Bruhn being singled out for praise re Phil from the game, “too good” for ECFL.
The Hill vs Bruhn AFL selection decision remains a very welcome conundrum.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Perryman & Flynn for mummy & Reid
Bruhn as sub
Whitfield in for Idun next week.
I reckon Hogan will be in next week as well.
To be honest I’d be disappointed in losing Idun. He has been developing well and he is enthusiastic as all hell.
Just trying to fit him in with Whitfield back is hard.
Whitfield for Stone & keep Idun - Whitfield/Perryman split wing/HBF roles?I reckon Hogan will be in next week as well.
To be honest I’d be disappointed in losing Idun. He has been developing well and he is enthusiastic as all hell.
Just trying to fit him in with Whitfield back is hard.
Whitfield for Stone & keep Idun - Whitfield/Perryman split wing/HBF roles?
Idun has been pretty impressive for a young KPD this year. Last year he looked pretty lost quite often but this year he is definitely understanding the flow of the game better.I reckon Hogan will be in next week as well.
To be honest I’d be disappointed in losing Idun. He has been developing well and he is enthusiastic as all hell.
Just trying to fit him in with Whitfield back is hard.