- Moderator
- #3,076
Port want to bring back teh bars. Must have won a couple games. Stella got her groove back.
Trashing their AFL heritage once again.
They want to celebrate their rivalry with us? Fine. Wear the original Port Power guernsey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Port want to bring back teh bars. Must have won a couple games. Stella got her groove back.
Saints will probably offer more $$$so it could be interestingIf he had a brain he should pick Carlton, StKilda are nothing club going nowhere
Something official?So Karl Amon is outta there. Wonder if he’ll end up at st Kilda or Carlton ? Probably get a contract similar to BCrouch so 2nd round pick
Davies was on the news last night saying the longer Amon remains unsigned the more likely to leaveSomething official?
There was some story about two or three St Kilda players having an altercation at a pubWhat’s this about ?
St Kilda has rejected claims stars Paddy Ryder and Bradley Hill were dropped last week due to an altercation at a bar in Melbourne’s south.
The club has confirmed a trio of players - Ryder, Hill and a third, unnammed teammate - were involved in a “verbal exchange and disagreement with fellow patrons”, the Saturday after the Round 14 loss to Essendon.
However “reports this evening stating that Paddy Ryder and Bradley Hill were not part of the Saints’ Round 15 team due to disciplinary reasons are incorrect,” the club said in a statement.
The incident was first reported on by radio station SEN in WA.
Ryder was managed for the game and Hill was listed as out due to personal reasons, their absences keenly felt as the Saints slumped to a third consecutive loss.
So paddy says he wasn’t the club says he was?Go Paddy!
I'd be more interest in a team based 'free kicks inside F50' stat over the same period.
Hopefully he gets 4.Fascinating Tribunal night looms for Tom Stewart, he is facing a minimum of 3 and as much as 5 games a possibility.
Cats are hoping that his good record and character over his career is taken into consideration.
How many games is that?
119 of course.
Is that how it panned out?So paddy says he wasn’t the club says he was?
The AFL is finally responding to the issue of players exploiting the protected zone after a mark or free kick.
AFL cracks down on 'exploitation' of protected area rule
About time too. I'm fed up with players deliberately dragging their opponent into the zone to try and milk a 50m penalty. Port do it more than anyone.
So what happens when the players split and go either side of the kicker, and the opposition player cuts back between the guy standing the mark and the kicker, to stay with the player that led him through?The AFL is finally responding to the issue of players exploiting the protected zone after a mark or free kick.
AFL cracks down on 'exploitation' of protected area rule
About time too. I'm fed up with players deliberately dragging their opponent into the zone to try and milk a 50m penalty. Port do it more than anyone.
Hopefully once they split the player is unable to receive a h/ball to play on if so recall the ballSo what happens when the players split and go either side of the kicker, and the opposition player cuts back between the guy standing the mark and the kicker, to stay with the player that led him through?
Will they still pay the 50 for running between the kicker and the player standing the mark?
The article clearly details that the defender after splitting will need to make immediate effort to leave the protected zone. So yes, running through the mark would be a 50 as it would be in the opposite direction of leaving the protected zone.So what happens when the players split and go either side of the kicker, and the opposition player cuts back between the guy standing the mark and the kicker, to stay with the player that led him through?
Will they still pay the 50 for running between the kicker and the player standing the mark?
To me that defeats the purpose of ‘punishing’ the player that tries to exploit the rule, if the chaser isn’t allowed to immediately re-engage by cutting back through the mark and the kicker. However, I agree the player shouldn’t be allowed to cut back through the mark under normal circumstances.The article clearly details that the defender after splitting will need to make immediate effort to leave the protected zone. So yes, running through the mark would be a 50 as it would be in the opposite direction of leaving the protected zone.
Dew is lucky to get an extension in my opinion. I get team has improved but they still look like missing the top 8 which is significant given their talent. Says alot about the clubs expectations.
Port kissed on the dick again, Stewart to miss the Cats game at AO v Port, with a 4 week ban.
Shapes as a massive game for the neighbours to make the 8.