Autopsy The Good (lol!) The Bad and the Beveridge.

[The Inbetweener]

If you were JUH, why on earth would you resign early in the season?

This is my biggest worry.

The biggest reason I wanted Bevo sacked after the Eagles game was to give us a season under a new coach and give the guys out of contact a chance to see where the club is heading.

My mail on Jamarra is consistent with what has been posted here in that he loves the club, but the big offers elsewhere (Sydney particularly) are very real and he’d be leaving a lot of money on the table to stay with us.

we can’t afford to have another bad year and have him wondering why he should pass up money for a team that under performs again.

 

[Foxman98]

Tim would be better suited in Lobb’s role (2nd ruck, 3rd KPF)

You don’t pay those players 1 mil though. Tim not being a dominant ruck really kills us against teams like Melbourne.

Tim played it today and sucked still

 

[theAthenian]

season almost over

we need leadership at all levels
in the coaching box
on the field
in the board room

if they don't win next week
nothing will change, the same old excuses will be bantered about by the same people

but because sometime hard love is needed
i will simply stop supporting this current team
until change comes

I'm too old to waste my time on this
we all deserve better.

 

[gordo2016]

If you were JUH, why on earth would you resign early in the season?

This is my biggest worry.

I noticed he clutched at his guernsey after kicking both goals as if to say "This is my club and I'm not going anywhere." Or maybe I'm just off the pace and that little gesture means nothing. If he left my passion for the club would plummett.

 

[adogsfan5]

15/16 we had a pretty slow side too didn’t we? But Jesus we played fast sexy footy.

 

[doggies ftw]

This is probably the harsh reality we have to face. Several players are either too slow, too small or lack disposal skills. There is unfortunately not a lot you can do with these types even with a shift in tactics. Then we come to the issue of whether we have enough depth to replace them. Not convinced we have.
We've already identified a few that are never going to get better. At the very least we don't want to see them in the team again.

Nah I call bullshit on this, our team was nearly 50% different to the team that played round 1 last year. And yet the result was borderline identical. It doesn’t matter what personal plays, we’re cooked deeper than that

 

[Anja_Nees]

Pooe performance in the end and very deflating.

It’s round one so move on I guess. We seriously need to do something next week or the media will be all over us before long.

 

[MaxiBont]

15/16 we had a pretty slow side too didn’t we? But Jesus we played fast sexy footy.

Off topic but I miss that era so much when we dish out performances like we did today. Morris, Boyd, Wood, Bob and countless others would never have let us get run over that badly.

 

[Dog 36]

15/16 we had a pretty slow side too didn’t we? But Jesus we played fast sexy footy.

You can have slow side with quick ball speed but you don’t want a fast side that has slow ball speed that makes it frustrating BUT

We manage to have the perfect storm slow side with slow ball speed that makes it impossible to watch

 

[Doggiesfan14]

I was excited heading into today, eager to see the new faces, fitness and the effect the new coaches had. Was happy to back in the selections calls as it was sign of change, wasn’t completely worried about the result if that excitement was back (2015 era).

But the performance that was delivered was disgraceful. Some quality individual performances but we’re over individuals showing up instead of the whole team. There was no spark, no energy, and nothing to suggest that any change at all has been implemented.

I think that’s the part I’m struggling to comprehend. With the amount of new players in the side, the new coaches etc, how that performance was the same as previous years.

I guess there is one thing that has remained the same..

 

[doggies ftw]

All that had to be said is we managed to select a team that was undermanned down back against Melbourne. Seriously probably rhe worst forward line in the league and we gave them an absolute free ride. Like they genuinely would have pissed themselves at how easy we made it for them

Hilarious

 

[MaxiBont]

The biggest reason I wanted Bevo sacked after the Eagles game was to give us a season under a new coach and give the guys out of contact a chance to see where the club is heading.

My mail on Jamarra is consistent with what has been posted here in that he loves the club, but the big offers elsewhere (Sydney particularly) are very real and he’d be leaving a lot of money on the table to stay with us.

we can’t afford to have another bad year and have him wondering why he should pass up money for a team that under performs again.

I don’t want to see it but apart of me wonders how insane that Swans team would be with Jamarra.

 

[dergert]

Who watched the press conference? What was said?

 

[Bulldogs85]

Jon Ralph Reported that James O’Donnell has Concussion so we wouldn’t be seeing the young lad anytime soon

 

[DueWest]

In the presser Bevo said he was surprised some of the guys who had good pre seasons that he picked ahead of Daniel had bad games.

After watching McNeil and VDM for years, how could he have been surprised?

Wow I’m sick of that commentary, Macrae and Daniel are AA and we are dished up Mr and Mrs Fumbles

 

[BrisDog]

Tim would be better suited in Lobb’s role (2nd ruck, 3rd KPF)

You don’t pay those players 1 mil though. Tim not being a dominant ruck really kills us against teams like Melbourne.

Grundy at 600-700k would have been a fine investment in hindsight. Great pick up by Sydney. He monstered Gawn last week, has a crack and doesn’t shirk a contest.

 

[Chicago1]

I just watched today's Bevo's Brief. I think I've seen it before.

On SM-A135F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Struggle]

I miss the rounds of footy where we don't play games

Bring in round 0.5 next year please and let us skip that too

 

[Chalky White]

On watching a full weekend of footy (yep I know, sad) West Coast, North Melb , Richmond, St Kildas and Hawthorn have all played as losing teams far more impressively than we did.
That's the sad reality of where we are at with this charlatan.
Gold Coast next week is going to be very tough. When have we ever said that? For me it's a 50/50 game. It should be a 90/10 game our way.
Long knives are getting sharpened

 

[mal68au]

Was unable to watch the game today, but after reading through this thread I gather it uh didn't go to plan. Disappointed but not surprised to hear that our gameplan/style hasn't improved at all.

I'll say that I've wanted Bevo gone for at least a couple of years (I'm all for it happening tomorrow lol), but the criticism for picking the likes of McNeil today is a bit unfair. We all complain when players aren't picked on form etc, and he was was fit and in form throughout the preseason.

If he's picked again next week, well that's another thing.

 

[Claudonious]

[emoji28][emoji106]

Better hold my hand I’m feeling sick is what I said after the game


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[mal68au]

Who watched the press conference? What was said?

I'm assuming the word 'journey' about 5 times

 

[Hobdog]

Was unable to watch the game today, but after reading through this thread I gather it uh didn't go to plan. Disappointed but not surprised to hear that our gameplan/style hasn't improved at all.

I'll say that I've wanted Bevo gone for at least a couple of years (I'm all for it happening tomorrow lol), but the criticism for picking the likes of McNeil today is a bit unfair. We all complain when players aren't picked on form etc, and he was was fit and in form throughout the preseason.

If he's picked again next week, well that's another thing.

I think we’re mostly concerned when consistent VFL form goes unrewarded, not preseason training and a couple of practice matches.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[doggies ftw]

imagine being so ****ing cocky you think Macrae and Daniel aren’t best 22, wowweee what a team we’d be if that was true

 

[Foxman98]

As always…

Some things to note...
We had 5 players who failed to lay a tackle
We targeted Naughton just 2 times inside 50 for the entire match

Expected Score / Actual Score
WB: 67 / 64 (-3)
ME: 83 / 109 (+26)

Expected Margin / Actual Margin: -16 / -45

Centre Bounce Attendance
26 - Bontempelli, Liberatore
22 - English, Treloar
7 - Lobb
5 - Sanders
4 - Harmes
3 - Gallagher
1 - Daniel

Ruck Contests (Hitouts / To Advantage / Sharked)
60 - English (21 / 10 / 1)
21 - Lobb (6 / 0 / 3)

Hitouts To Advantage
WB: 10
ME: 17

English v Gawn (45 contests)
Hitouts: 8 / 24
To Advantage: 4 / 14
Clearances: 20 / 21
Score: 2.3 / 3.3

English v van Rooyen (15 contests)
Hitouts: 13 / 2
To Advantage: 6 / 0
Clearances: 6 / 5
Score: 1.0 / 2.1

Lobb v Gawn (15 contests)
Hitouts: 2 / 10
To Advantage: 0 / 2
Clearances: 6 / 8
Score: 0.0 / 2.0

First Possessions
WB: 33

ME: 44

Clearances / Effective Clearances
WB: 34 / 19 (56%)
ME: 36 / 26 (72%)

Tackle Efficiency
WB: 56%
ME: 64%

Smothers
WB: 6

ME: 13

Forward Half Kicking Efficiency
WB: 44%
ME: 63%

Defensive Half Kicking Efficiency
WB: 79%
ME: 78%

Forward Half Contested Marks
WB: 7
ME: 6

Defensive Half Contested Marks
WB: 2
ME: 6

Defensive Half Intercept Marks
WB: 12
ME: 20

Score Launches
3 - Bontempelli, English
2 - Bramble, Sanders
1 - Dale, Johannisen, L. Jones, Khamis, Liberatore, McNeil, West, Williams

Targets Inside 50

18 - No target/rushed
10 - Ugle-Hagen
5 - Weightman
4 - Lobb
3 - English, West
2 - Naughton, Vandermeer
1 - Harmes, Liberatore

Inside 50 Repeat Entries
WB: 17
ME: 9

Shots At Goal
WB: 24 (38%)
ME: 28 (57%)

Scoring Profile (Western Bulldogs / Melbourne)
Set Shot: 5.6 / 6.7
Snap: 3.3 / 5.3
On Run: 1.0 / 4.1
Mark Play On: 0.0 / 1.0
Ground Kick: 0.0 / 0.0

0M-15M: 0.0 / 2.0
15M-30M: 2.4 / 8.2
31M-40M: 3.1 / 4.6
41M-50M: 4.3 / 2.2
51M+: 0.1 / 0.1

Scores Directly From FK/50MP: 2.0 / 1.1
Scores In Time-On: 3.0 / 5.5
Scores Sourced From Defensive Half: 2.5 / 6.9

Score Assists
2 - Bontempelli, Johannisen, West
1 - English, Gallagher, Liberatore, McNeil, Naughton, Ugle-Hagen, Weightman

Defensive 50 Marks
WB: 46
ME: 53

Defensive 50 Intercept Marks
WB: 9 

ME: 7

Defensive Half Turnovers
WB: 11
ME: 25

Forward Half Turnovers
WB: 57

ME: 35

Unforced Turnovers
WB: 14
ME: 11

Unforced Turnovers By Player
2 - Richards, Ugle-Hagen
1 - Bontempelli, Bramble, Dale, English, L. Jones, Khamis, Liberatore, Sanders, Vandermeer, Weightman

Dropped Marks (Uncontested Only)
WB: 4

ME: 1

Turnovers Punished By Goals
1 - Coffield, English, L. Jones, Khamis, Lobb, McNeil, Richards, Sanders, Vandermeer

Champion Data Ranking Points (Supercoach)
126 - Bontempelli
119 - English
105 - Bramble
97 - Johannisen
92 - Liberatore
91 - Treloar
90 - Ugle-Hagen
87 - Dale
71 - Richards
68 - West
67 - Williams
56 - Weightman
51 - Khamis
50 - Coffield
49 - Gallagher
45 - Daniel
43 - L. Jones
43 - Sanders
41 - McNeil
40 - Naughton
35 - Harmes
32 - Vandermeer
28 - Lobb

AFL Player Rating Points
21.8 - Bontempelli
20.2 - Bramble
14.8 - Liberatore
13.4 - Johannisen
13.1 - English
12.4 - Richards
12.1 - Dale
11.4 - Williams
10.9 - Ugle-Hagen
9.5 - Treloar
9.4 - Gallagher
8.6 - West
7.1 - Naughton
6.9 - Daniel
5.3 - Khamis
5.3 - L. Jones
3.6 - Lobb
2.7 - Coffield
2.1 - Weightman
2.1 - McNeil
0.2 - Sanders
-0.6 - Vandermeer
-1.8 - Harmes

Time In Forward Half
Q1
WB: 50%
ME: 50%

Q2
WB: 65%
ME: 35%

Q3
WB: 47%
ME: 53%

Q4
WB: 51%
ME: 49%

Match
WB: 53%
ME: 47%

Pressure Gauge
Q1
WB: 166 (Poor)
ME: 175 (Below Average)

Q2
WB: 164 (Poor)
ME: 171 (Below Average)

Q3
WB: 162 (Poor)
ME: 195 (Above Average)

Q4
WB: 155 (Poor)
ME: 167 (Poor)

Match
WB: 162 (Poor)
ME: 177 (Below Average)

Pressure Points Per Player
56 - Bontempelli
49 - West
39 - Harmes
37 - Gallagher
32 - Liberatore
30 - Treloar
30 - English
25 - Ugle-Hagen
23 - Daniel
23 - Vandermeer
22 - Sanders
21 - Bramble
21 - Weightman
19 - Lobb
19 - McNeil
19 - Richards
18 - Johannisen
17 - Dale
17 - Williams
14 - Naughton
11 - Coffield
9 - Khamis
5 - L. Jones

Score Sources
Scores From Stoppages: 3.3 / 7.5 (1.2 / 2.0 from the centre)
Scores From Turnovers: 6.5 / 9.7
Scores From Kick-Ins: 0.2 / 0.1

Pressure rating says it all