Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Edition

What should we do with our 1st round draft pick?

  • Finn O’Sullivan

    Votes: 57 19.0%
  • Sid Draper

    Votes: 86 28.7%
  • Josh Smillie

    Votes: 22 7.3%
  • Jagga Smith

    Votes: 34 11.3%
  • Split for best mid and Tobie Travaglia

    Votes: 46 15.3%
  • Split for best mid and Liam Baker

    Votes: 20 6.7%
  • Split for best mid and best KPD

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • Split for best two mids

    Votes: 9 3.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 13 4.3%
  • Sam Lalor

    Votes: 9 3.0%

  • Total voters
    300
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.


Quick links:
Player contract status
Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)
AFL retirements and delistings



Latest news and rumours:


 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Not interested unless we get him on the cheap trade-wise. Which we won't, so they can keep him or the dockers can have him.
I suspect whether we do or don't trade for him won't have much to do with whether you think they can keep him or the Dockers can have him ;) Given the leaking interest, people might want to get used to the idea.
 
I suspect whether we do or don't trade for him won't have much to do with whether you think they can keep him or the Dockers can have him ;) Given the leaking interest, people might want to get used to the idea.
Weird comment, nothing we say on here has much impact on anything the team decides to do, was just expressing my opinion much like any of the other thousands of posts on this forum.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Overpaying Jack Graham to trigger band 2 or band 3 compo plus a second rounder is the way to go for Baker.

I'd be livid if we split our first or gave up 2 seconds for him, but I don't think we're that stupid.
 
Overpaying Jack Graham to trigger band 2 or band 3 compo plus a second rounder is the way to go for Baker.

I'd be livid if we split our first or gave up 2 seconds for him, but I don't think we're that stupid.
As far as this year’s trade targets go we should not involve our R1 or F1 in any capacity. As I’ve previously said if you want to game the system Norf style, band 1 FA deal for Graham so Tigers get a top 5 pick then we trade our F4 for Baker and pay him the base wage. Jack and Liam then go halves in Jack’s wage. Everyone wins.

Alternatively tell the Dogs and Tigers we have a 2R and a F2 to trade for Baker and Buss. First in gets the 2R, last past the post gets F2.

I’d rather just leave Baker for Freo.
 
As far as this year’s trade targets go we should not involve our R1 or F1 in any capacity. As I’ve previously said if you want to game the system Norf style, band 1 FA deal for Graham so Tigers get a top 5 pick then we trade our F4 for Baker and pay him the base wage. Jack and Liam then go halves in Jack’s wage. Everyone wins.

Alternatively tell the Dogs and Tigers we have a 2R and a F2 to trade for Baker and Buss. First in gets the 2R, last past the post gets F2.

I’d rather just leave Baker for Freo.
Baker will decide where he goes and if he picks us then beggars can't be choosers. Busslinger, Baker and Graham in for 2 second rounders would be a great result, top 5 even.
 
As far as this year’s trade targets go we should not involve our R1 or F1 in any capacity. As I’ve previously said if you want to game the system Norf style, band 1 FA deal for Graham so Tigers get a top 5 pick then we trade our F4 for Baker and pay him the base wage. Jack and Liam then go halves in Jack’s wage. Everyone wins.

Alternatively tell the Dogs and Tigers we have a 2R and a F2 to trade for Baker and Buss. First in gets the 2R, last past the post gets F2.

I’d rather just leave Baker for Freo.

There’s no world where we pay Graham enough to trigger band 1 FA compo. Band 2 would be a stretch

Maybe band 3

If Baker does choose us I hope we offer either our R2 or F2 and say that’s the best we can do

It’s unders but we’ve been on the wrong side of a trade like that in the past, most recently with Rioli

Any Graham talk is separate
 
There’s no world where we pay Graham enough to trigger band 1 FA compo. Band 2 would be a stretch

Maybe band 3

If Baker does choose us I hope we offer either our R2 or F2 and say that’s the best we can do

It’s unders but we’ve been on the wrong side of a trade like that in the past, most recently with Rioli

Any Graham talk is separate
Agree with all of the above, was more of a piss take of the system. I still think Baker’s too old for the age profile we should be looking at outside of FA
but I’d sleep at night if we got Buss and Baker for our 2R and F2 in either combination.

I’d rather wait until next year and have a crack at Ed Richards, Kane Farrell and Brandon Starcevich via FA in addition to the obvious Sam Taylor attempt.

OOC next year and in a better age profile than Baker if we’re giving up draft capital are:

Chad Warner
Finn Callaghan
Judd McVee
Angus Sheldrick
Riley Hardeman
James Tunstill

Our F2 for example would possibly be enough for any of the last 4 on that list next year as our 2R.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top