Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Semi Final: Changes vs. Hawthorn

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

All info about the match, including tickets, barcode/ticket requests can be found via our Finals Hub


A reminder that the sharing of barcodes is at your own risk and we won’t be responsible for any misuse of barcodes.
 
I know, but I think if you are a gold member you should get priority over 3 game members for access to tickets (I'm not a gold member btw).
It seems reasonable to me.

The benefits are made available prior to purchasing the product. I agree it makes sense to have a hierarchy that you can buy into. But others will argue it’s unfair on those that can’t afford it.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You have to think there are more changes.

9 Defenders - 1 playing up forward, 1 playing mid and 1 as the sub.
So i imagine that 2 of these are out, possibly Smith and Bond and then Max moves back to defence.
If not Bond then possibly Hinge, purely for match ups.

Unfortunately Billy & Sid did nothing to scream 'Pick Me' yesterday in the SANFL, however given Hawthorns speed, I would look to bring them both in and go all out attack in an attempt to beat Hawthorn at their own game.

So for me, I am doing:

Worrell | Keane | Laird
Milera | Murray | Michallaney
Cumming | Dawson | Curtin
Keays | Thilthorpe | ANB
Pedlar | Walker | Fogarty
ROB | Soligo | Peatling
Rachele, Dowling, Draper, Berry
Sub: Hinge

In: Rachele, Draper, Dowling
Out: Smith, Bond, Taylor

Midfield Rotation 1 - Dawson, Soligo, Peatling
Midfield Rotation 2 - Berry, Dowling, Draper
Midfield Rotation 3 - Dawson, Curtin, Draper

I would also consider Draper or Berry as the starting sub and have Hinge on the pine.
I fear Nicks is going to go the opposite.
The last few weeks before finals we seem to have reverted to the 2024 game plan (because that worked so well). He would have watched Hawthorn on the weekend and convinced himself we need to go even more defensive. We will play the slowest game style in history. Until we are 6 goals down and then we will try and play fast to catch up.
 
The answer is: Nicks.
But it's super weird we went in with so many defenders.
Because: Nicks. It's his default, go-to last resort.
Smith and laird have largely been interchangeable, but both played.
Because: Nicks.
Bond came in when Michaelanney went out, but both played.
Because: Nicks.
We then end up subbing hinge for smith.
Because: Nicks.
Laird goes in to the midfield.
Because: Nicks.
(Nicks loves Laird and loves him in the midfield even more)
For an "attacking" team it seem a very weird time to go defensive.
Because: Nicks.
It's obvious the boys love their attacking football and it's when they play their best.
Nicks loves defence, defence, DEFENCE.

Look at 2024, post-preseason. The Crows came out looking like an altogether different side from the one that finished 2023 and were potentially Finals-bound.
They played dour (-if-not-confused) footy. Chip-chip, slowdown, and it cost them an 0-4 start from which they never fully recovered (8W, 1D, 14 losses, 15th. :grimacing::sadv1:).
2025: add ANB, Peatling, Cumming + Davis, and we get a much better balance between defence and attack after a flying start and some tactical changes which Nicks adopts, to his credit. With an attacking mindset (players + Davis) and a strong defence (Nicks) we play much better footy and
1757305811503.png

Minor Premiers. FnBeauty, but we still have 3 Finals to win against Finals-hardened teams but 2 of our stars out.

Our midfield rotations were ****en awful and putting laird through there was fine but not really what we want when he was omitted previously as a midfielder.
Because: Nicks, who has underdeveloped Draper, Dowling, Edwards by limiting their opportunities, even when we were playing much weaker sides.

I get that Rachele and Rankine are injured and that removes those options being available for centre rotations. But the selections and options we chose ****en stink.
Agree strongly, because: Nicks.
Come Finals, we're without back-up-variety options because Rachel (inj.) and Rankine's brainfade.
So, Nicks has to revert to type and old favourites.
I don't really know what the changes need to be. But address that mess.
:thumbsu: :thumbsu:.
Address: Nicks.
With Geelong, Blighty was all-out attack (it helped to have freak Ablett) but they lost THREE GFs :)eek::eek::eek:),
1989 in a shoot-out (Ablett 9 goals, Norm Smith medal)
1992, another shoot-out, WCE defence thwarted Geelong.
1994, Ablett well-held, WCE stormed home, Geelong ran outta puff.
Blight found his offence-defence balance in 1997/98 + his midfield did not bomb hack-kicks forward (also, their use of the corridor was brilliant).

Nicks has learned; he's grown. No question.
Good.
Hopefully he will improve even more, but his team does not like all-out defence.
It stifles their instincts.
Nicks has made some changes, but with 2 forward/mid stars out he's reverted to type: DEFENCE, at all costs.

Nicks won't be sacked anyway (and after this year I think he deserves his shot at taking them further, surprise, surprise of me, see above :sneaky:), but he's got to let the boys play with freedom and attacking flair, while maintaining the strong defence he's built up.
We need a better defensive forward --- maybe Pedlar will fill that role, finally, after his good QF?
AND
a gun mid (maybe Curtin, in 2026?) and with Draper developing we might find the winning Finals balance between Nicks' defence and forwards who are well-fed by a slick, eyes-lowering midfield.

I hated the way we played in the QF loss, but for the first time since 2017, I'm looking forward to our next season. Who'da thunk it?
 
The answer is: Nicks.

Because: Nicks. It's his default, go-to last resort.

Because: Nicks.

Because: Nicks.

Because: Nicks.

Because: Nicks.
(Nicks loves Laird and loves him in the midfield even more)

Because: Nicks.
It's obvious the boys love their attacking football and it's when they play their best.
Nicks loves defence, defence, DEFENCE.

Look at 2024, post-preseason. The Crows came out looking like an altogether different side from the one that finished 2023 and were potentially Finals-bound.
They played dour (-if-not-confused) footy. Chip-chip, slowdown, and it cost them an 0-4 start from which they never fully recovered (8W, 1D, 14 losses, 15th. :grimacing::sadv1:).
2025: add ANB, Peatling, Cumming + Davis, and we get a much better balance between defence and attack after a flying start and some tactical changes which Nicks adopts, to his credit. With an attacking mindset (players + Davis) and a strong defence (Nicks) we play much better footy and
View attachment 2420252

Minor Premiers. FnBeauty, but we still have 3 Finals to win against Finals-hardened teams but 2 of our stars out.


Because: Nicks, who has underdeveloped Draper, Dowling, Edwards by limiting their opportunities, even when we were playing much weaker sides.


Agree strongly, because: Nicks.
Come Finals, we're without back-up-variety options because Rachel (inj.) and Rankine's brainfade.
So, Nicks has to revert to type and old favourites.

:thumbsu: :thumbsu:.
Address: Nicks.
With Geelong, Blighty was all-out attack (it helped to have freak Ablett) but they lost THREE GFs :)eek::eek::eek:),
1989 in a shoot-out (Ablett 9 goals, Norm Smith medal)
1992, another shoot-out, WCE defence thwarted Geelong.
1994, Ablett well-held, WCE stormed home, Geelong ran outta puff.
Blight found his offence-defence balance in 1997/98 + his midfield did not bomb hack-kicks forward (also, their use of the corridor was brilliant).

Nicks has learned; he's grown. No question.
Good.
Hopefully he will improve even more, but his team does not like all-out defence.
It stifles their instincts.
Nicks has made some changes, but with 2 forward/mid stars out he's reverted to type: DEFENCE, at all costs.

Nicks won't be sacked anyway (and after this year I think he deserves his shot at taking them further, surprise, surprise of me, see above :sneaky:), but he's got to let the boys play with freedom and attacking flair, while maintaining the strong defence he's built up.
We need a better defensive forward --- maybe Pedlar will fill that role, finally, after his good QF?
AND
a gun mid (maybe Curtin, in 2026?) and with Draper developing we might find the winning Finals balance between Nicks' defence and forwards who are well-fed by a slick, eyes-lowering midfield.

I hated the way we played in the QF loss, but for the first time since 2017, I'm looking forward to our next season. Who'da thunk it?
Starting to think it might be Nicks
 
In: Power Stance

Say what you will but at least they came out up and about, and got good starts in finals with the Power Stance.
I don't wanna see that 'power stance', but against the Hawks it might work.
Their team has plenty of larrikins who'll be laughing too hard to make a decent start.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Michalanney looked match fit tonight?


Now imagine how rusty Rankine will be after effectively 6 weeks off and the shit he has gone through in the media.


Same with Rachele next week. People think these guys with zero Finals experience can turn it on at that level with no match fitness?



It is academic though...
Taylor offered nothing so playing a rusty Rachele will not be a net loss
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Semi Final: Changes vs. Hawthorn

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top