RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
Yeah no team is going to give away a top 5 pick for a 29/30 year like Ryer or Gray where you might only get 2 or 3 years out of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wines talent is hardly speculative and Wingard would not want to leave Adelaide which significantly lowers his market value. Remember it's not past output or what we think of a player that's dictates what they are worth, it is purely whatever a club is willing to pay to get a player they need in the door.Some over inflation of picks here. If Wingard was on the open market and we had a top 3 pick, I’d take the known multiple AA player, with 7-10 years left, over speculation.
There is no way you would get to top 5 picks for Chad and Ollie... you can ask for them but you won't get them.We have a number of players that right now would easily net us a top 5 pick, god even the number 1 pick from teams. You just have to look at what Lachie Weller just got Freo.
Robbie Gray
Paddy Ryder
Charlie Dixon
Ollie Wines
Chad Wingard
Chad and Ollie you could be asking for 2 top 5 picks and teams would easily pay that. The others not so much due to their age, but easily worthy of 1 top 5 pick.
At the very least you would get a top 5 and another 1st rounder for both of them.There is no way you would get to top 5 picks for Chad and Ollie... you can ask for them but you won't get them.
It'd depend on is there competition for them, or if they'd nominated a club. Look at what we paid for Dixon and Ryder. With a club nominated it was later first + second. Now if they'd said they were happy to go anywhere it would have gotten into top 10 territory. Wingard / Wines are younger (and without the injury history / possible suspension that Dixon and Ryder had over them respectively when traded), so you'd get a top 5 pick. And I'd say a 2nd round pick. We wouldn't get two top 5 picks. I think you'd only get a top 5 and another first if you sent a second the other way as part of it.At the very least you would get a top 5 and another 1st rounder for both of them.
Zac Milbank's got a voice for the newspaper.Listen to what Jack Lukosius thinks of training with Port this week in this interview with Zac Milbank, with the sound cloud link embedded in the story.
http://sanfl.com.au/lukosius-lapping-elite-environment/
There is no way you would get to top 5 picks for Chad and Ollie... you can ask for them but you won't get them.
I kept an eye out for him but didn't see him but that doesn't mean he wasn't there. I stayed in the same spot for the entire session.Power Pete hopefully
What a halfwit he sounds like...reminds me of "Tecks Walker"Zac Milbank's got a voice for the newspaper.
What a halfwit he sounds like...reminds me of "Tecks Walker"
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-12-20/powers-newlook-forward-line-taking-shape
PORT Adelaide fans got their first look at what promises to be a potent forward line, with Charlie Dixon and Jack Watts working in tandem at training on Wednesday morning. At an open session attended by about 1000 supporters at Alberton Oval, Dixon and Watts lined up alongside each other during match simulation. Dixon played deeper most of the time during the 20-minute drill, although there were occasions he pushed up with Watts dropping back into space. The Power are hoping the addition of Watts – acquired in a trade from Melbourne for the 31st overall pick in the 2017 NAB AFL Draft – will assist with their delivery into attack. Dixon, 27, is coming off a career-best season after booting 49 goals and averaging 6.5 marks a game. The pair also collided during an earlier contested ball drill with Watts keeping his feet after being on the end of a big bump from the 105kg Dixon................
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-12-20/powers-newlook-forward-line-taking-shape