Remove this Banner Ad

Port Adelaide v Richmond. AFL Round 4, 2019

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chief
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

who the hell names their kid "Sydney Stack"????? ????

Richmond to win it by two goals is my tip but happy to be proven wrong.
What's wrong with Sydney?
Sydney "Syd" Jackson was one of the great indigenous players. Maybe he was an inspiration to Stacks parents.
 
Well .. when dixon has achieved of what jack has achieved, he may be considered in the same breath!
Still can't handle a simple concept.

Why did Richmond lose with Martin hey? Bf logic.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

WRONG
Astbury goes to Dixon, Rance doesn’t take anyone because he never plays on any opponent because he just gets beaten. How do you not know this?
Uh yeah umm ok. If you say :)
 
He's a utility. He's in his own class atm. A very unique player in today's game.

But he's not a key position one out permanent target.

He is a tall player who played most of the game forward. That makes him a tall forward today. He did kick 5 in the opening round playing the same role. That makes him a tall forward of note in most people’s view.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

giphy.gif
 
Uh no we don't. We have a kid in Marshall who was dropped.

Last year we had no one to replace Ryder. The coach was to pig headed to put a new kid in.

Sam Grey is 4 foot nothing, he came in. It's screwed us.

We have a tonne of depth in key defenders, shipped out a good one too. Also loaded with inside mids and back pockets. As you are with forward pockets....
Dixon hasn't played all year though.
So how did you win your other games?

This is a guy who kicked a whopping 26 goals last year. So whatever he offers it's not goals. We use bloody Josh Caddy as a marking target too so dont use that excuse.
 
He is a tall player who played most of the game forward. That makes him a tall forward today. He did kick 5 in the opening round playing the same role. That makes him a tall forward of note in most people’s view.
Not anyone that actually watches him every week
 
Dixon hasn't played all year though.
So how did you win your other games?
With Marshall as I said.

But Hinkley replaced him with Sam Gray, how's that working you think?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

False equivalence. We got a few goals from them. Ryder got a goal from a holding free where the opponent had both hands around him in a bear hug. Robbie Gray got a goal from a free kick when his opponent grabbed an arm with both hands and tried to yank his shoulder out of its socket. Sam Gray got a goal from a deliberate where McIntosh punched the ball 10 rows into the crowd where even a halfwit wouldn't try to argue he was doing anything else. We got a few HTB not paid, as did you. But the holds, highs, etc you got were weak as piss. If the umpiring was consistent either Nankervis doesn't get a goal, or We get 6-8 free kicks in ruck contests in the 1st half. If the umpiring was consistent, Lynch doesn't get 50m and a goal and we get a shot on goal 10m out in the last 2 minutes, but 2 of your players get warnings and we get to go eat a bag of shit. You got bailed out in your defence in the last quarter with nothing free kicks. As usual the free kick counts don't have to be equal. If you're getting free kicks for turning up and you get to scrag us all night for the same amount, its not really even is it?

I'm now convinced it's just a South Australian thing to piss and moan incessantly about umpires and completely ignore the shit that went your own way.

Maybe ask the Adelaide fans how to make a youtube video of all the injustices and you will feel better
 
No, it's actually really easy to accept all of the above. No argument from me. I just made an observation on the commentary hype for Richmond's newest superstar who got lucky and was flattered by his tally of 6 goals.

I prefer good commentary over infotainment

Brown = peanut.
Got lucky? How much football do you watch? I'm assuming you consume a fair bit. The guy finished what he was supposed to as a dedicated tall forward. That's his job. To put the score on the board. He kicked 6 on the road with a heavily depleted team who had their backs to the wall against a side that was looking to make a home ground claim of their own.

He didn't slot 3 iffy ones in a noble loss. He bagged the crap out of clutch shots (not counting the free in the goal square). He nailed his set shots and if you recall Richmond were wasteful in the first half kicking 6.8. They went on to score 9.1 in the second half and Lynch led the way. There was nothing soft about it.

Tonight he did exactly what the RFC recruited him for. Kicking goals to win games.
 
With Marshall as I said.

But Hinkley replaced him with Sam Gray, how's that working you think?
Okay so its Hinkleys fault. At least now we are getting somewhere.

Do you think Port win if Dixon plays?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom