Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not an issue, we can just not use 50.If Macrae kept on sliding on draft night I could see us trading something like 19 + 28 for Collingwood's pick 14. We get Macrae, Collingwood have an interest in Poulter who will be there at 19, and they are looking to bring in more picks in this years draft after their list exodus, and we solve our issue of only wanting to use 3 picks at the draft.
I don't mind just taking the 3 picks inside the top 30 but would you rather have Macrae who is a top 10 talent and someone we rate really highly or Holmes who many see as not in the top 50 and pick 28 (which will be 30-35)? Not using pick 50 also just seems like a waste since we got it in a fairly even trade and will slide into around the 45 mark just seems like a waste not to use it at all.It's not an issue, we can just not use 50.
Spending 2 high picks considering what we spent to get them and that we got Rivers in the second round last year just to move from 19 to 14 seems stupid to me. If we thought the talent in this draft cut off at 14 then we should package all our picks for a single shot at the top 10 then. 3 cracks inside around 30 looks good to me.
This. We've got solid recruiters and good picks to get some sliders who might slip through, or pick up some slight roughies we can take a punt on.It's not an issue, we can just not use 50.
Spending 2 high picks considering what we spent to get them and that we got Rivers in the second round last year just to move from 19 to 14 seems stupid to me. If we thought the talent in this draft cut off at 14 then we should package all our picks for a single shot at the top 10 then. 3 cracks inside around 30 looks good to me.
It's not an issue, we can just not use 50.
Spending 2 high picks considering what we spent to get them and that we got Rivers in the second round last year just to move from 19 to 14 seems stupid to me. If we thought the talent in this draft cut off at 14 then we should package all our picks for a single shot at the top 10 then. 3 cracks inside around 30 looks good to me.
I don't mind just taking the 3 picks inside the top 30 but would you rather have Macrae who is a top 10 talent and someone we rate really highly or Holmes who many see as not in the top 50 and pick 28 (which will be 30-35)? Not using pick 50 also just seems like a waste since we got it in a fairly even trade and will slide into around the 45 mark just seems like a waste not to use it at all.
Because last year every team was clear on who they were drafting, it's a complete unknown still ATM with 3 picks between 18-30Alos top Kent hasn’t dropped any names this year?
Yeah gotcha, a lot of water to go under the bridge, I feel it is less which we want but more just hoping for a slider or beat available.Because last year every team was clear on who they were drafting, it's a complete unknown still ATM with 3 picks between 18-30
Our second pick in Twomeys phantom I think, I would have thought more 3rd/if a trade back/out at 50 even. 20 seems very early on him.Holmes is very athletic and a very good runner. Although I feel he falls under the umbrella of “ athlete” that could turn into a footballer.
At what pick are they forecasting we will use for him??
Because last year every team was clear on who they were drafting, it's a complete unknown still ATM with 3 picks between 18-30