- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #476
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The problem they face is the $3.4bn price they paid for Foxtel is underpinned by the afl & nrl rights, they can’t really afford to lose either of them. If there is competition for the nrl rights they are going to have to find the money from somewhere or potentially face hefty asset write downs.Bad luck, DAZN. That's the deal that was signed.
The next deal might not be so good though. And this news might not be so good for the NRL's upcoming deal.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Foxtel ratings are rarely published anymore, so you don’t know how the afl is rating relative to the nrl. Of the finals ratings that have been published they were both very strong.I wonder if dazn are looking at their ratings for afl games vs nrl games and wondering why they’re paying so much for afl.
Problem for dazn is that they won’t want to pay the nrl the same as what they’re now paying the afl, even though that’s what the nrl will be demanding and more considering the bigger ratings they get. There’s no way dazn can afford to lose the nrl rights.
Nrl has more leverage they could go elsewhere.
It points to a scenario where either dazn keep paying afl as per the existing agreement and potentially lose the nrl, or dazn pushes to reduce the afl package and then try to win the nrl rights at this reduced rate.
Correct if fox wants to be the home of sport in Australia it must have both afl and nrl. Nrl has traditionally been the Crown Jewels of foxtel losing it would be an absolute shitshow for them to lose it and they’d want to avoid that at all cost. So what this will mean moving forward for both codes who knows.The Foxtel ratings are rarely published anymore, so you don’t know how the afl is rating relative to the nrl. Of the finals ratings that have been published they were both very strong.
The afl is only in its first year, I would assume that given fox paid up soo much to secure exclusive Saturday games for the first time, they would expect subscriber growth over the length of the deal, not all at once. Fox can’t afford to lose either of them, but it is in the interests of both codes that they remain on the same pay service, as there is some audience cross over that ultimately benefits them both in selling their games.
.There's always exit clauses in these deals.AFL’s biggest broadcast partner isn’t happy with its deal – and it’s pulled the plug before
The owner of Foxtel, the AFL’s major broadcast partner, believes it is paying too much for the rights following its decision to pull the plug on a second domestic soccer deal in Europe over financial concerns.
Two senior media industry sources, who requested anonymity to discuss contractual matters, said Foxtel’s British owner, sports streaming giant DAZN, felt it was overpaying for a domestic product with limited scope for subscription growth, and could seek to claw back money from the agreement.
DAZN, which bought Foxtel for an enterprise value of $3.4 billion last December, inherited the AFL rights for which Seven and Foxtel paid a combined $4.5 billion over seven years, to 2031. Previous reports put Foxtel’s contribution at about $418 million a year, or almost $3 billion in total.
Five senior sports industry sources said it was widely accepted that Foxtel had been pushed to its upper limits after a massive offer from Paramount that would have yielded $6 billion over 10 years.
![]()
AFL’s biggest broadcast partner isn’t happy with its deal – and it’s pulled the plug before
The British sports streaming giant has recently terminated domestic soccer deals in France and Belgium.www.theage.com.au
Bad luck, DAZN. That's the deal that was signed.
The next deal might not be so good though. And this news might not be so good for the NRL's upcoming deal.
Those 3 ideas are as yet unproven if they'll work.If you want to keep the broadcaster happy, the first thing the AFL can do is to add new content:
Origin
2 Wildcard Finals
Tassie Team
All of those are good for Channel 7.
Not sure how much any of those things drive increased Fox/Kayo subscriptions, but more viewers increases value of the advertising and sponsorships.
Fast tracking a 20th team adds a 10th game, but even if the AFL was rushing a team in - 2030 is only the second last year of the deal.
The other side of this whole deal, is are they looking to cut back on some things?
AFLW broadcasting runs at a hefty loss for them, so if AFL want that to continue to be broadcasted they'll pay for it?
Broadcasting matches from one off venues is a loss maker. Alice Springs, Barossa Valley & Cairns require temporary infrastructure to be built then dismantled making Broadcasting those matches a loss maker. Again if AFL wants them, then pay the broadcaster.
Ch7 gets far more given it pays only a third of the bill. Fixturing will be the big one to watch for changes.
Geez our resident leagiues are all over this story worried it might stuff up their future tv rights money.
How ridiculous though, dazn buy a company that they know have this deal about to start in 2025 and are now complaining the deal is too much? They just had a record year for AFL audiences on Foxtel too, what were they expecting?
I hope the afl don’t budge and hold them to it, they probably wanna weasel the afl down so they can pay for the nrl rights, ie. the afl's main competitor. Surely the contract is water tight.
test cricket certainly is!Cricket is on fire
uh.... subscriber growth? They are not in a growth industry here.AFL’s biggest broadcast partner isn’t happy with its deal – and it’s pulled the plug before
The owner of Foxtel, the AFL’s major broadcast partner, believes it is paying too much for the rights following its decision to pull the plug on a second domestic soccer deal in Europe over financial concerns.
Two senior media industry sources, who requested anonymity to discuss contractual matters, said Foxtel’s British owner, sports streaming giant DAZN, felt it was overpaying for a domestic product with limited scope for subscription growth, and could seek to claw back money from the agreement.
DAZN, which bought Foxtel for an enterprise value of $3.4 billion last December, inherited the AFL rights for which Seven and Foxtel paid a combined $4.5 billion over seven years, to 2031. Previous reports put Foxtel’s contribution at about $418 million a year, or almost $3 billion in total.
Five senior sports industry sources said it was widely accepted that Foxtel had been pushed to its upper limits after a massive offer from Paramount that would have yielded $6 billion over 10 years.
![]()
AFL’s biggest broadcast partner isn’t happy with its deal – and it’s pulled the plug before
The British sports streaming giant has recently terminated domestic soccer deals in France and Belgium.www.theage.com.au
Bad luck, DAZN. That's the deal that was signed.
The next deal might not be so good though. And this news might not be so good for the NRL's upcoming deal.
Cricket is on fire
It's funny that, the longer the program the more opportunity for people to tune in the higher the reach. Who would've thought.Yep, getting AFL like reach figures