- Banned
- #5,951
Thanks for the interesting read.It definitely helps.
Somehow he managed to recruit way more muscle fibres than he normally would I spose?
rambling story follows>>>
I knew a guy who used to do various martial arts and ended teaching Tai Chi of some sort. He was also post graduate (either sports science or natural medicine but probably sports science) stuff at Southern Cross Uni in Lismore. this was back in the 90s. He was trying to show "chi" existed, and although he never did one of his experiments was very interesting. i was one of his experimental subjects. He wanted to compare the effect of one particular training technique - a form of the horse riding stance that Chinese yoga/Chi Kung practitioners use. can't remember its specific name, but there are a few different ones and this one is one of the hardest/most physically demanding to do. I was fit and in my 20s at the time, had some familiarity with that stuff and noticed it was hard to maintain this stance for more than a couple of minutes. Instead of 45 minutes to an hour that I could do with some other ones.
So we'd sit on a bench and this bloke would strap our leg to something that would measure how much force a maximal contraction with your quads could generate, in Newtons. You'd do an unassisted maximum and then an assisted one. The unassisted one involved kicking as hard as you could and the assisted one involved attaching electrodes to your legs then getting enough electricity to theoretically cause an actual maximal contraction. Obviously it wasn't enough of a contraction to rip the muscle off the tendon.
The theory is that you don't activate or recruit all your muscle fibres when you do a maximal contraction (especially compared to jolting your leg with electricity). This was shown by his results. there was a large difference between the maximum force generated by the unassisted and assisted contractions. Probably at least 10% (can't remember exactly as it was 20 years ago) 60 to 70 newtons.
The guy was working on the theory that improving (and therefore showing the existance of) "chi" would be demonstrated by a decrease in the difference between your maximal assisted and unassisted contractions. Especially if they both improved overall as part of a training effect. He had different groups, some that did their normal lives and the chi Kung, some that did nothing, some that did an exercise regime and some that did the exercise regime and the chi kung. I was in the first group. Over the course of the experiment my personal results were quite noticeable. The difference between contractions decreased to well under 50 newtons while the amount of force generated increased by at least 10%. Between 65 and 100 N but I can't remember exactly.
A secondary theory was that if nothing else the horse riding stance would train all the fibres in your quads - you'd start out using faster twitch fibres to hold yourself up and as they tired the slower twitching firbes would pick up the slack. Basically you're (theoretically) not training your legs so much as your nervous system to function more effectively and activate more more muscle fibres than it previously did.
It was definitely noticeable. I noticed my legs were stronger and worked more effectively within a few weeks. I'd still be doing that stance if my joints were up to it.
I also noticed that my performances on the tests were better after a couple of beers. Which raises other interesting questions too.
<<<<anyway
Somehow LMac did the equivalent without any form of extra training.
Adrenaline probably helped. There are plenty of stories of people performing superhuman feats of strength in very stressful situations where adrenaline would be flooding their systems.
It's official luke McDonald's story will now be told alongside the mother that lifted up a car to rescue her daughter. The only difference is I'm changing the story to the 2nd highest recorded speed in the AFL...EVER.