- Jun 14, 2015
- 17,764
- 38,756
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Power
"heart, balls and grunt!" "played well against MEN... in the SANFL!!!!"I can only assume what their functioning eyes revealed was a highly skilled, hard running 18 yo with leadership abilities (u18 captain) and with enough heart/balls/grunt to compete with and play well against men at SANFL level as a 17 yo. As was apparently the view of the majority of the functioning eyes in recruitment and draft watching nation wide, at the time.
Also, the hip issue became apparent after we drafted him I think?
Hindsight is a wonderful thing - and you’re claiming its not hindsight, that you knew before hand, which is great. Well done, you got lucky or you were just ahead of the curve in terms of the lower risk associated with drafting big bodied, contested mids vs drafting skinny, outside types early in the draft.
But even then, does that mean that you should always go for the Wines types? I’d argue no because most of the time they have a lower scope for improvement - what you see is what you get and there’s always the risk that they were beating up in kids smaller than themselves and that when competing against big hardened AFL bodies they won’t look as dominant.
You did a great job, thank you for drafting Toumpas! Consensus Number 2!
Edit:
In all seriousness, it's wrong to say Toumpas was universally acclaimed as the second best kid. Clearly GWS didn't think so given they had two chances to get him after Whitfield and didn't- and there were plenty of dissenting voices on demonland and here (mine included... if you know what to look for )
Toumpas might have been the more "skilled" or whatever but I've always valued competitiveness more because I thought this was exactly what Melbourne needed (for pretty obvious reasons). And then there was the heart-warming "best mates with Jack" story too. No way I could go past that- I'm a sentimental fool after all.
Anyway, I don't care. Toumpas is s**t, Oliver rules.
Last edited: