Carbine Chaos
TK Defender
- Apr 1, 2009
- 67,865
- 107,088
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
B Dick - Two goals in his first senior outing this year . Outstanding pressure .
Great news about the pressure! He's been Eagle-ised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
B Dick - Two goals in his first senior outing this year . Outstanding pressure .
Dick not as soft as once thought?Great news about the pressure! He's been Eagle-ised.
He'll rise to the occasion.Dick not as soft as once thought?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Our rookie/PSD selections are often a mixed bag and a portion of those that do succeed we often underutilise. Some teams have a great strike rate with their later picks/rookie list (Freo, Collingwood), whereas WC seem to often take a big gamble.Why did West Coast choose Callum Papertalk over Marley Williams? There were some on here saying WC should take Williams - who looked the good prior to being drafted, and is looking the goods at present - yet WC instead chose a guy who struggles at WAFL reserves level.
I hope WC taking Papertalk isn't a case of Bedford MkII.
You beat me too it I was going to say the exact same thing mate. Really rate him as a player would slip into our team with ease has the potential to be a good line breaking mid too. Seriously need to address this problem in coming years cause I doubt with the compo picks and extra teams we won't have the luxury to waste picks.Why did West Coast choose Callum Papertalk over Marley Williams? There were some on here saying WC should take Williams - who looked the goods prior to being drafted, and is looking the goods at present - yet WC instead chose a guy who struggles at WAFL reserves level.
I hope WC taking Papertalk isn't a case of Bedford MkII.
Why did West Coast choose Callum Papertalk over Marley Williams? There were some on here saying WC should take Williams - who looked the goods prior to being drafted, and is looking the goods at present - yet WC instead chose a guy who struggles at WAFL reserves level.
I hope WC taking Papertalk isn't a case of Bedford MkII.
Why did West Coast choose Callum Papertalk over Marley Williams? There were some on here saying WC should take Williams - who looked the goods prior to being drafted, and is looking the goods at present - yet WC instead chose a guy who struggles at WAFL reserves level.
I hope WC taking Papertalk isn't a case of Bedford MkII.
Youre as reactionary as usual.
I was a massive fan of Williams, but the knock on him was his fitness and his attitude. Collingwood is a good place for him, get out of the state and into a professional environment without the influence of friends and family. In saying that the standard of football he produced for WA, hard at the ball, strong, great kick of the football and reminded me of Chapman. It is beyond safe to say that Williams wouldn't be close to getting a game with us at the moment (we do things differently to Collingwood).
Papertalk was pretty bloody good for East Frementles colts side in 2011 and the stats reflect that, the step up can take some time for kids as raw as he is. He needs a lot more miles in his legs and the coaches will having him going after KPI's not reflected in the WAFL's stats sheets. It's a shame we have to cut a couple of rookies this year at the very least, because they need more time
But forgetting Williams and Papertalk, Nelson would be better than both. Wouldn't bring anything all that new to our list but he's a better footballer.
Says out A Embley for the swans?
I'd consider throwing Williams name around at the expense of Papertalk to be pretty reactionary, especially after half a season. If Williams didn't crack a game with Collingwood prematurely then we wouldn't hear of it.
How many people around BF have seen Papertalk play for Easts this season?
Ive always found half way through their first season is the best time to judge rookies.
We, here, constantly assess players. The Sunday Times, for example, does it too. Is Papertalk exempt because he's a first year rookie? I certainly don't think so, and The Sunday Times doesn't think so either.
Constant assessment is different to definitive, papers stamped, judgment.
I realise that, but saying that we should've taken Williams over Papertalk based purely on what we've seen so far is ridiculous. Cox and Glass were absolute spuds at this point.