ThePuppetMaster
Yay
Surely you're kidding - very good player, very underrated player.
He'll be 27 next season.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Mega Thread 2012 List Management thread
- Thread starter rohansword
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Surely you're kidding - very good player, very underrated player.
He'll be 27 next season.
Sunny_
Brownlow Medallist
Don't even want? We would love to keep him. He still has a year left on his contract, though has apparently asked for a trade with the Dees right into him.
Again, all speculation and rumours
Eth
For sale
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
ThePuppetMaster
Yay
Theseventhhamster
Brownlow Medallist
Rischitelli for Morton, Petterd and Joel Mac.
Tulip
Hall of Famer
- May 3, 2009
- 37,249
- 34,500
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Tottenham
Theseventhhamster
Brownlow Medallist
Joking about what?
Tulip
Hall of Famer
- May 3, 2009
- 37,249
- 34,500
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Tottenham
That three spuds=1 quality player
Blackas87
Brownlow Medallist
Rischitelli is a quality player?
Theseventhhamster
Brownlow Medallist
Petterd isn't a spud he'd have good value. Morton would have value given his age and possible potential, Joel is well... yeah.
Captain Jack
Norm Smith Medallist
Melbourne Demons - Jake Lever Player Sponsor 2018
Melbourne Demons - Katherine Smith AFLW Player Sponsor 2018
Melbourne Demons - Ben Kennedy Player Sponsor 2017
Melbourne Demons - Katherine Smith AFLW Player Sponsor 2017
Ex-Moderator
Melbourne Demons - Ben Kennedy Player Sponsor 2016
Ultimate Footy Champ
Melbourne Demons - Jeremy Howe Player Sponsor 2015
Amusing that you're still defending this. Morton is a pea-heart who can't put on weight and has massive confidence issues; Petterd has talent but doesn't seem to want to apply himself; Joel tries hard but has suspect disposal under pressure. Most importantly though, GC have to reduce their list from 46 to 42, so why would they want to take on three average players from a terrible club? Just means they have to delist another two kids.
Rubbish idea sorry.
Theseventhhamster
Brownlow Medallist
Meh, I don't particularly care about something I took 12 seconds to type and less to come up with. Maybe it's feasible maybe not, just spitballing it. I don't rate Morton but there are teams that would still think he could blossom in a different setting. See the Bulldogs wanting Bate for reference. Ricky again I'm not defending his season but I have no doubt he has currency in the trade market. As I thought would be obvious I tacked on Joel because I don't want him on our team.
- May 6, 2012
- 2,059
- 1,964
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole. Could think of about 8 guys in line that would be better value than him
- May 6, 2012
- 2,059
- 1,964
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
People have got to stop looking at where a player was drafted. Morton was pick 4, so he must have potential. No, Morton is a wiry, weak, passionless player who player who constantly crushes momentum and is terrible under pressure. Draft number means nothing, or at least this should be our attitude, and in fact has been the problem for our club. Too many people are relying on numbers than the cold hard facts.
Demons2012
BFSC Gold
Rischitelli is one of the better suggestions I've heard, if GC was to package him up with Toy and Caddy would be well worth an early first round pick. It all depends where we have to get Viney. With the exception of Petterd wouldnt think any players im willing to part with would offer GC any value.
- May 6, 2012
- 2,059
- 1,964
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I'll Give up 13 and Petterd for Caddy and Toy
Demons2012
BFSC Gold
I agree on Morton. Has lost any value he had, I would trade him for a pick around the 50 mark if it was on offer. He's had long enough to show his worth and is still not getting a regular game in one of the worse sides. Needs to go on a steroid/protein diet for a preseason.
Eth
For sale
Which is exactly why we wouldn't trade him.
As much of a whipping boy as he is, his ceiling is much higher than a pick 50.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
rhaz
Cancelled
- Jun 30, 2008
- 8,490
- 6,819
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I doubt 13 + Petterd would be enough to get Caddy on his own.
Sunny_
Brownlow Medallist
I would do 13 on its own for Caddy.
rhaz
Cancelled
- Jun 30, 2008
- 8,490
- 6,819
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Really? I just thought considering his original draft position (7) and a couple of years in the system would increase his currency.
I'll be honest i haven't really seen him play this year and have no idea how good he is (or if we even want him) but last year i seem to remember the trade demands for him were quite high.
Sunny_
Brownlow Medallist
He's done fairly well this year and got himself a RS nom. Like I said, 13 I would be take myself, but not much later than that.
Eth
For sale
Thing is, it hasn't been a spectacular two years from Caddy (i.e. you'll still ask for Prestia or Lynch's value - around pick 10 - in a trade) so that does drop his value a bit.
I'm just not sure whether Melbourne will see more in a Menzel or Kennedy or Stringer versus a Caddy, who to be fair, I heard was happier now up north than he was at this point last year.
Demons2012
BFSC Gold
It's funny how much we value a draft pick over a proven quantity. Pick 13 is not necessarily going to get us a good player, yeah we could get a Selwood but plenty of failures at that stage of the draft too. Atleast we know Caddy will play, maybe he won't be a star but will improve our side dramatically. I think 13 for Caddy is about right, if we can get Risch in too, maybe 4 if they give us a sweetner, say their second choice and throw in Toy.
Will make for intersting viewing.
Will make for intersting viewing.
- Status
Similar threads
