Not really. In a high level deliberate doping scenario you would be leaving a set of documents akin to the fake set of books. The actual regimen wouldn't be getting recorded where it could be found and used as evidence against the program. Kane McGoodwin is right, no documentation is an admission of guilt. The question I'd pose is who would be stupid enough to knowingly document illegal injections. The fact that the records were destroyed suggests that the Dons wouldn't knowingly keep such records available to be used against them. I don't recall the Armstrong case identifying a complete lack of documentary evidence regarding their supplement program.
Although not as clueless as the idiots on 5AA just now. They think even if the players are found guilty, they have been punished enough and any punishments would be directed towards the club admin. Um nope, that isn't how this hearing works. The admin haven't been charged with anything because they can't be under the WADA code. They are the ones ultimately responsible for what happened at Essendon, but it is the way of the code that they can't be punished and the onus is purely on the athlete (this has changed a bit with the new code in place where support staff can also finally face appropriate penalties in relation to an athlete doping).
