Thanks for the abuse mate - appreciate it
You misinterpreted my question to the responders. My point was if GWS wins next year's flag and I had put say my entire bank on it then I have increased my bank by 350% over 20 months. That is not easy to do for most people.
If guys like you are hitting consistently 18% POT (congrats) then I can understand why you would have no interest in a bet of this type. Potentially guys like Jugada and X_Box_X may also be able to do better than 350% bank growth over 20 months with their methods. Hence the question.
I was just questioning the "why would you tie your money up for that period" logic. If you are consistently profitable over that period on your bets and you can beat the 350% growth I was quoting then I understand. However for the majority more bets doesn't always equal more profit.
Putting your entire bank on 1 bet is just as awful. You are acting like this bet is a guaranteed win with that logic anyway. You are more likely to lose 100% of your bankroll
Lets say you put $1000 on them at $3.50 now and best case scenario for you the Giants dominate the 2018 season and go into the finals as the $2 favourite. By that stage you would have still only theoretically turned your $1000 into $1750. Hardly worth it for 19 months of no betting. Even if you have no edge you could arb/promo hunt and turn that $1000 into more than $1750 in that time with little effort and no risk
I mean its your money so do what you want, but its a terrible way to bet if you take your punting even half seriously. If you dont bet much and dont plan to for the next year and a half and just want it as a speculative bet for interest then go to town but i would never recommend having money tied up for that long or putting your entire bank on one bet