Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2017 List Management: Contracts, Trading, Drafting, Academy

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/st-...s/news-story/541e54145257e6efd2bd1f90ef42e829

I don't understand Jack Steele's comment that the Giants didn't want him?

My understanding is that there was an offer on the table but his management held off and advised him he would have more opportunities in the midfield elsewhere?

Did we not make him an offer?
I think maybe he was part of the clean out we had to do to the list numbers

But I did think he was rated highly at the club

On HUAWEI NXT-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
I think maybe he was part of the clean out we had to do to the list numbers

But I did think he was rated highly at the club

On HUAWEI NXT-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app
The club would definitely have wanted to keep him, esp after Bruce (the other prominently promoted ACT guy left), as an inside mide he had plenty to give, our issue was probably just that we didn't lack for players for that role and thus wouldn't pay overs or promise spots onfield on promise.
I expect him to have a long and hopefully prosperous career at the saints, I think he will end up more valuable to them than Josh.
 
Last edited:
Good friend of mine has some verified links to the club. I pressed him for news on resignings this week.... very tight lipped but did say that he was certain we will only keep one of Kelly/smith his year- can't afford both
 
Good friend of mine has some verified links to the club. I pressed him for news on resignings this week.... very tight lipped but did say that he was certain we will only keep one of Kelly/smith his year- can't afford both
Interesting, Kelly clearly the better player, but is he the most valuable to us?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Good friend of mine has some verified links to the club. I pressed him for news on resignings this week.... very tight lipped but did say that he was certain we will only keep one of Kelly/smith his year- can't afford both
I think we all thought that deep down. Didnt like it but thats what we expected.



Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
It might be Smith and two high picks plus cap space to keep guys like Hopper in the style they hope to become accustomed.
Not that I dont think Kelly would be good.
 
Nice to see that after Buntine's ACL we have re-signed him until 2019, and would expect we will shortly do the same with Adam Kennedy as well
http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2017-05-09/buntine-recommits-to-the-giants


I agree, I reckon he will be on a heavily incentivised deal with pay for play heavily worked in.

He is a good club man, very popular, has his share of talent and is part of the blue collar fabric our star laden list is a little shy of.

Wish him a speedy recovery.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Kelly the better player. But I don't think he's 10 mil over 10 good, that is for your Ablett, Franklin, Bontempelli, Dangerfield types and he isn't on that level IMO.

Might be that Smith is the better value for money.
 
Kelly the better player. But I don't think he's 10 mil over 10 good, that is for your Ablett, Franklin, Bontempelli, Dangerfield types and he isn't on that level IMO.

Might be that Smith is the better value for money.
Mind you, we won't be forking out anything like that.
 
Personally I wouldn't mind the club having a quiet word to Griffen about where they see him in 2018 and that it might be best if he didn't see out his contract and moved into an off field role at the club, but only if that means we are a better chance of holding onto all of Smith, Hopper and Kelly.
 
Personally I wouldn't mind the club having a quiet word to Griffen about where they see him in 2018 and that it might be best if he didn't see out his contract and moved into an off field role at the club, but only if that means we are a better chance of holding onto all of Smith, Hopper and Kelly.
Would like this as well.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
If Kelly decides to leave, and St Kilda would offer the Hawthorn 2017 1st round + Saints 2017 1st round + Saints 2018 1st round, what kind of player or pick might be deemed equitable to be packaged alongside Kelly? It looks like a top 5 + top 12 + top ~14, for Kelly + ????? (based on expected ladder positions).
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If Kelly decides to leave, and St Kilda would offer the Hawthorn 2017 1st round + Saints 2017 1st round + Saints 2018 1st round, what kind of player or pick might be deemed equitable to be packaged alongside Kelly? It looks like a top 5 + top 12 + top ~14, for Kelly + ????? (based on expected ladder positions).

Big Dawson.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top