List Mgmt. 2019 Draft Mega Thread - Pickett is not eligible as F/S or NGA

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

Ok with your first three picks I chose Will Gould, Jeremy Sharp and Sam De Koning (hopefully he can be turned into a permanent foward)

 

[Butters Made Me Do It]

first two fine but turning backmen into forwards is a multiple try failure at Port

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

first two fine but turning backmen into forwards is a multiple try failure at Port

Yeah fair enough, I was thinking the same. However, he does have the scope to play foward. Not really alot of tall fowards left, unfortunately

 

[Butters Made Me Do It]

Yeah fair enough, I was thinking the same. However, he does have the scope to play foward. Not really alot of tall fowards left, unfortunately

yeah, its why i dont reckon we’ll go one with our first three picks

 

[Janus]

Ok with your first three picks I chose Will Gould, Jeremy Sharp and Sam De Koning (hopefully he can be turned into a permanent foward)

Looking at your mock draft, I would have went:

12. Dylan Stephens (went to Geelong at 18)

18. Trent Rivers (went to Geelong at 24)

and then used 29 on De Koening.

That would be closer to what we would actually do.

 

[Jonts]

I'm all for Jackson with 12 let alone 18

 

[Jonts]

I don't mind the Sam De Koning pick but lol that we would have to turn him into a forward with what 2 actual defenders on the list?

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

I don't mind the Sam De Koning pick but lol that we would have to turn him into a forward with what 2 actual defenders on the list?

I was just filling a need for your list, as I already picked Gould as a key defender with 12. One of your posters said that you needed a key foward so I tried

 

[Sleezy]

I don't mind the Sam De Koning pick but lol that we would have to turn him into a forward with what 2 actual defenders on the list?

By my calcs we have
- 2 KPFs (Dixon/Marshall) + 2 rucks (Ladhams/Hayes)
- 2 KPDs (Clurey/Grundy) + 3 psuedo KPDs (Jonas/Lienert/McKenzie).

We also have Watts and Westhoff as competent/versatile third tall forwards/half back sweepers.

Both situations are dire, but KPF is legitimately worse.

FWIW, I reckon we'll run with Dixon, Marshall, Ladhams up front. Clurey, Jonas, Watts down back. Westhoff on the bench as floater/tall wingman.

 

[Jonts]

I was just filling a need for your list, as I already picked Gould as a key defender with 12. One of your posters said that you needed a key foward so I tried

A
Any club that drafts Gould as a key defender is making a mistake
2
Whilsts that's true we do need more, DeKoning isn't the answer imo

 

[snozulu]

Yeah fair enough, I was thinking the same. However, he does have the scope to play foward. Not really alot of tall fowards left, unfortunately

It's a shame you can't help us with a new coach.

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

It's a shame you can't help us with a new coach.

Hahahaha I know, sorry mate Simmos taken

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

A
Any club that drafts Gould as a key defender is making a mistake
2
Whilsts that's true we do need more, DeKoning isn't the answer imo

Fair enough mate. You have obviously seen more of these players then I have.
In your opinion which players are the answer for your team?
Should I have picked a better tall with a later pick and gone best available with your first 3?
Would slightly shorter options like Mitch Georgiadis or Ben Middleton suffice?

 

[Rendaw]

The only tall players worth drafting are McAsey, Jackson, Gould and Worrell. If its not them then dont even think about it with our picks.

 

[Rendaw]

I want Robinson with 12 in preparation to replace Wines with his Carlton move. He can learn what not to do in his first year.

 

[Holden Hillbilly]

Chris25 has these SA players going later in the draft so may be there in the 60s if we want to use a late pick or wait until the rookie draft:

Harry Schoenberg - 25 to 50 180cm midfielder
Cameron Taheny - 30 to 50 185cm forward
Kysaiah Pickett - 40 to 60 170cm forward
Dyson Hilder - 40 to 70 195cm defender
Karl Finlay - 40 to 70 192cm defender
Josh Shute - 40 to 70 186cm winger
Josh Morris - 40 to rookie 186cm forward
Callum Park - 50 to rookie 188cm forward

I would also include Harrison Magor 183cm midfielder.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

Fair enough mate. You have obviously seen more of these players then I have.
In your opinion which players are the answer for your team?
Should I have picked a better tall with a later pick and gone best available with your first 3?
Would slightly shorter options like Mitch Georgiadis or Ben Middleton suffice?

It's all a bit of fun and you can't conform to everyone's opinion.

That was a good mix of players.

 

[briztoon]

Hi guys, curious as to how many drafts picks you look like taking to the draft? And if you believe there would possibly be any interest in trading your pick 29 for pick 34 and 48?

 

[Holden Hillbilly]

Hi guys, curious as to how many drafts picks you look like taking to the draft? And if you believe there would possibly be any interest in trading your pick 29 for pick 34 and 48?

Yes as we will probably take F/S Mead with our pick 29 but could use the 34 instead and then 48 instead of 67.

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

Yes as we will probably take F/S Mead with our pick 29 but could use the 34 instead and then 48 instead of 67.

is Mead worth pick 29?

 

[briztoon]

is Mead worth pick 29?

Where does Adelaide bid on Mead?

 

[Wedgetailed Westerner]

Where does Adelaide bid on Mead?

That i'm unsure of

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

That i'm unsure of

Cal Twomey is putting him around 20th or 21st in his list of best players in the draft - not phantom draft but phantom form guide. A 20-30 range has been pretty consistent for last 2 or 3 months now from many who do these assessments and phantom drafts.

Will have to look at the HPN Footy guys in a couple of weeks time as they collate about 15 guys phantom draft picks, and do a consensus phantom draft a week before the draft and the day of the draft.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

Hi guys, curious as to how many drafts picks you look like taking to the draft? And if you believe there would possibly be any interest in trading your pick 29 for pick 34 and 48?

I don't think there is enough advantage in that to Port. We would still have to use 34 on Mead and then probably lose enough points from 48 to drop it back to the mid 50s.

And there is still an outside chance Mead isn't bid on before 29.

 

[Zakk Wylde]

Ben Sokol