Yes.Will we take him if he's available at our first pick?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Will we take him if he's available at our first pick?
I'm pretty similar, apart from no interest in Weightman and at #18 I'd like Sharp/Rivers.
I disagree. The club is definitely on the rebuild. We brought in Geoff Morris for exactly this.My worry is we will pick the player that we think will have the most impact next year to try and make finals, save kens job and leave kemp on the board.
I disagree. The club is definitely on the rebuild. We brought in Geoff Morris for exactly this.
Ken’s contract will have nothing to do with it.
This is the list management team and recruiters domain.
If we get someone who is AFL ready this year it will definitely be a bonus for developing the group though.
Just wont happen. I highly doubt he will be there at 12 (14), let alone 16 (18).If we don’t take Kemp at 12 we are dumb, but if we don’t pick him there and he falls to our 2nd pick that would be delicious.
Na, I think the club directive will stop that. My worry is more that we'll have yet more players stuck developing under Hinkley which is a proven wasteland for talent.My worry is we will pick the player that we think will have the most impact next year to try and make finals, save kens job and leave kemp on the board.
If Kemp is on the board at our first and we don't take him I might cry
I have no idea.
At a guess we would. We should. He has a place in our side wherever you want to play him.
If Melbourne bid could GWS want to trade out pick 4?The ideal for us is for Melbourne to bid on Green at 3 and no one to bid on Henry before 12. That way 12 stays as 12.
Three with MeadWith three picks in the top 20 you can afford to take Kemp and still get two players that will help this year.
In the unlikely event that happened I'd take Kemp and try and trade 16 and 18 for 13 and something next year to get them both.If Stephens and Kemp are there at Port's pick, which one would you take?
That's what Balmer is suggesting, Stephens and Kemp could slide past Hawthorn.
The ideal for us is for Melbourne to bid on Green at 3 and no one to bid on Henry before 12. That way 12 stays as 12.
So what exactly do you propose we do? Egg the joint? Burn it down? Maybe a protest picket line?I don't get it. Are you not tired of just accepting and living with the things the club does? Just because they employ someone to do a job doesn't mean it will be done well (e.g. Hinkley).
If Stephens and Kemp are there at Port's pick, which one would you take?
That's what Balmer is suggesting, Stephens and Kemp could slide past Hawthorn.
If we choose Stephens over kemp...I will be very sooky.