What if one of the parties (the Vic Govt) is actually responsible for creating the force majeure conditions (OK, not like they had much choice, but still...)?Obviously I have not reviewed the contract, but I would assume that the current pandemic would be covered off by the definition of a "force majeure event". ...As such, I really do not understand (subject to seeing the contract) on what legal grounds the Victorian government could seek "compensation" from the AFL for moving the game to another venue.
(Just playing Denis Denuto with that one
Anyway, even if you could argue force majeure, the AFL isn't going to invoke that and give the middle finger to the Vic Govt. The worst part is that another state government is going to have to, in effect, pay the compensation bill on behalf of the AFL.
Given that that would mean taking home games from non-Vic teams, you'd hope it would get massive pushback from the non-Vic clubs and be a non-starter.What is the bet that, as a result of this compensation, either more games have to be scheduled in Victoria (specifically at the MCG)
The problem with that, IMO, is the limited pool of potential venues. It's WA, SA, Qld, NSW, Vic; same 5 governments lining up every year. IMO You'd end up playing the GF for several years at least, in the state that was most willing to plunder their treasury for status. And I don't think I'd want my State govt to be trying to (and god forbid, succeeding in) outbidding the big boys every year, just to line the pockets of the AFL.wouldnt it make much more financial sense to have the states bid on the Grand Final, similar to the process in the NFL? This could have provided a huge cash windfall for the AFL if there was competitive pressure each year.